Vora Nemi, Christensen Peter R, Demarteau Jérémy, Baral Nawa Raj, Keasling Jay D, Helms Brett A, Scown Corinne D
Biological Systems and Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Advanced Systems Analysis Group, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Schlossplatz 1, A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria.
Sci Adv. 2021 Apr 9;7(15). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abf0187. Print 2021 Apr.
Mechanical recycling of polymers downgrades them such that they are unusable after a few cycles. Alternatively, chemical recycling to monomer offers a means to recover the embodied chemical feedstocks for remanufacturing. However, only a limited number of commodity polymers may be chemically recycled, and the processes remain resource intensive. We use systems analysis to quantify the costs and life-cycle carbon footprints of virgin and chemically recycled polydiketoenamines (PDKs), next-generation polymers that depolymerize under ambient conditions in strong acid. The cost of producing virgin PDK resin using unoptimized processes is ~30-fold higher than recycling them, and the cost of recycled PDK resin ($1.5 kg) is on par with PET and HDPE, and below that of polyurethanes. Virgin resin production is carbon intensive (86 kg COe kg), while chemical recycling emits only 2 kg COe kg This cost and emissions disparity provides a strong incentive to recover and recycle future polymer waste.
聚合物的机械回收会使其降级,以至于经过几个循环后就无法再使用。相比之下,化学回收为单体提供了一种回收用于再制造的内含化学原料的方法。然而,只有有限数量的商品聚合物可以进行化学回收,并且这些过程仍然资源密集。我们使用系统分析来量化原生和化学回收的聚二酮烯胺(PDK)的成本和生命周期碳足迹,PDK是下一代聚合物,在环境条件下于强酸中会解聚。使用未优化工艺生产原生PDK树脂的成本比回收它们高出约30倍,回收的PDK树脂成本(1.5美元/千克)与PET和HDPE相当,且低于聚氨酯。原生树脂生产碳密集度高(86千克二氧化碳当量/千克),而化学回收仅排放2千克二氧化碳当量/千克。这种成本和排放差异为回收和再利用未来的聚合物废料提供了强大的动力。