Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain.
Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Am Heart J. 2021 Jul;237:104-115. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.04.001. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
The use of Renin-Angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been questioned because both share a target receptor site.
HOPE-COVID-19 (NCT04334291) is an international investigator-initiated registry. Patients are eligible when discharged after an in-hospital stay with COVID-19, dead or alive. Here, we analyze the impact of previous and continued in-hospital treatment with RASi in all-cause mortality and the development of in-stay complications.
We included 6503 patients, over 18 years, from Spain and Italy with data on their RASi status. Of those, 36.8% were receiving any RASi before admission. RASi patients were older, more frequently male, with more comorbidities and frailer. Their probability of death and ICU admission was higher. However, after adjustment, these differences disappeared. Regarding RASi in-hospital use, those who continued the treatment were younger, with balanced comorbidities but with less severe COVID19. Raw mortality and secondary events were less frequent in RASi. After adjustment, patients receiving RASi still presented significantly better outcomes, with less mortality, ICU admissions, respiratory insufficiency, need for mechanical ventilation or prone, sepsis, SIRS and renal failure (p<0.05 for all). However, we did not find differences regarding the hospital use of RASi and the development of heart failure.
RASi historic use, at admission, is not related to an adjusted worse prognosis in hospitalized COVID-19 patients, although it points out a high-risk population. In this setting, the in-hospital prescription of RASi is associated with improved survival and fewer short-term complications.
血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEi)和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)在新型冠状病毒病 2019(COVID-19)患者中的应用受到质疑,因为它们共享一个靶受体部位。
HOPE-COVID-19(NCT04334291)是一项国际研究者发起的登记研究。符合条件的患者为因 COVID-19 住院后出院、死亡或仍在住院的患者。在这里,我们分析了住院期间使用 ACEi/ARB 对全因死亡率和住院并发症发展的影响。
我们纳入了来自西班牙和意大利的 6503 名年龄超过 18 岁的患者,这些患者的数据包括 ACEi/ARB 治疗情况。其中,36.8%的患者在入院前接受任何 ACEi/ARB 治疗。ACEi/ARB 组患者年龄较大,男性居多,合并症和身体虚弱程度更高。他们的死亡和入住 ICU 的概率更高。然而,调整后这些差异消失。关于住院期间 ACEi/ARB 的使用,继续使用 ACEi/ARB 的患者年龄较小,合并症相对平衡,但 COVID19 更轻。ACEi/ARB 组的死亡率和次要事件发生率较低。调整后,继续使用 ACEi/ARB 的患者死亡率、入住 ICU、呼吸衰竭、需要机械通气或俯卧位、脓毒症、全身炎症反应综合征和肾衰竭的风险显著降低(所有 P<0.05)。然而,我们没有发现 ACEi/ARB 住院使用与心力衰竭发展之间的差异。
入院时 ACEi/ARB 的既往使用与住院 COVID-19 患者调整后预后较差无关,但提示这是一个高危人群。在这种情况下,住院期间处方 ACEi/ARB 与生存率提高和短期并发症减少相关。