• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与认知矫正训练相比,元认知训练对抑郁症患者的副作用。

Side effects of the metacognitive training for depression compared to a cognitive remediation training in patients with depression.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Asklepios Clinic North, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 12;11(1):7861. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87198-8.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-87198-8
PMID:33846503
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8041905/
Abstract

Although awareness of side effects over the course of psychotherapy is growing, side effects are still not always reported. The purpose of the present study was to examine side effects in a randomized controlled trial comparing Metacognitive Training for Depression (D-MCT) and a cognitive remediation training in patients with depression. 84 patients were randomized to receive either D-MCT or cognitive remediation training (MyBrainTraining) for 8 weeks. Side effects were assessed after the completion of each intervention (post) using the Short Inventory of the Assessment of Negative Effects (SIAN) and again 6 months later (follow-up) using the Negative Effects Questionnaire (NEQ). D-MCT and MyBrainTraining did not differ significantly in the number of side effects. At post assessment, 50% of the D-MCT group and 59% of the MyBrainTraining group reported at least one side effect in the SIAN. The most frequently reported side effect was disappointment in subjective benefit of study treatment. At follow-up, 52% reported at least one side effect related to MyBrainTraining, while 34% reported at least one side effect related to the D-MCT in the NEQ. The most frequently reported side effects fell into the categories of "symptoms" and "quality". Our NEQ version was missing one item due to a technical error. Also, allegiance effects should be considered. The sample size resulted in low statistical power. The relatively tolerable number of side effects suggests D-MCT and MyBrainTraining are safe and well-received treatment options for people with depression. Future studies should also measure negative effects to corroborate our results.

摘要

尽管人们对心理治疗过程中的副作用的认识不断提高,但副作用仍未得到全面报告。本研究的目的是在一项比较抑郁的元认知训练(D-MCT)和认知矫正训练的随机对照试验中,研究副作用。84 名患者被随机分配接受 D-MCT 或认知矫正训练(MyBrainTraining)8 周。在每次干预结束后(后)使用负面效应短量表(SIAN)和 6 个月后(随访)使用负面效应问卷(NEQ)评估副作用。D-MCT 和 MyBrainTraining 在副作用数量上没有显著差异。在后测评估中,D-MCT 组的 50%和 MyBrainTraining 组的 59%报告了 SIAN 中至少有一种副作用。最常报告的副作用是对研究治疗主观获益的失望。在随访中,52%报告了与 MyBrainTraining 相关的至少一种副作用,而 34%在 NEQ 中报告了与 D-MCT 相关的至少一种副作用。最常报告的副作用属于“症状”和“质量”类别。由于技术错误,我们的 NEQ 版本缺少一个项目。此外,还应考虑忠诚效应。样本量导致统计能力较低。相对可容忍的副作用数量表明,D-MCT 和 MyBrainTraining 是安全且深受抑郁症患者欢迎的治疗选择。未来的研究还应测量负面效应,以证实我们的结果。

相似文献

1
Side effects of the metacognitive training for depression compared to a cognitive remediation training in patients with depression.与认知矫正训练相比,元认知训练对抑郁症患者的副作用。
Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 12;11(1):7861. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87198-8.
2
Long-term efficacy of Metacognitive Training for Depression (D-MCT): A randomized controlled trial.抑郁的元认知训练的长期疗效(D-MCT):一项随机对照试验。
Br J Clin Psychol. 2019 Sep;58(3):245-259. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12213. Epub 2018 Dec 16.
3
Investigating the efficacy of an individualized metacognitive therapy program (MCT+) for psychosis: study protocol of a multi-center randomized controlled trial.调查个性化元认知治疗方案(MCT+)治疗精神病的疗效:一项多中心随机对照试验的研究方案
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Feb 27;16:51. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0756-2.
4
Efficacy and moderators of metacognitive training for depression in older adults (MCT-Silver): A randomized controlled trial.老年人群抑郁的元认知训练疗效及其调节因素(MCT-Silver):一项随机对照试验。
J Affect Disord. 2024 Jan 15;345:320-334. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.10.118. Epub 2023 Oct 19.
5
Metacognitive Therapy versus Cognitive Behaviour Therapy in Adults with Major Depression: A Parallel Single-Blind Randomised Trial.认知行为疗法与元认知疗法治疗成人重性抑郁障碍的随机单盲平行对照试验
Sci Rep. 2020 May 12;10(1):7878. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64577-1.
6
Negative cognitive beliefs, positive metacognitive beliefs, and rumination as mediators of metacognitive training for depression in older adults (MCT-Silver).消极认知信念、积极元认知信念以及沉思作为老年人抑郁症元认知训练(MCT-Silver)的中介因素
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 22;14:1153377. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1153377. eCollection 2023.
7
Randomized control trial to assess the efficacy of metacognitive training compared with a psycho-educational group in people with a recent-onset psychosis.一项随机对照试验,旨在评估元认知训练与心理教育组相比,对近期发病的精神病患者的疗效。
Psychol Med. 2017 Jul;47(9):1573-1584. doi: 10.1017/S0033291716003421. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
8
Efficacy of metacognitive training for depression as add-on intervention for patients with depression in acute intensive psychiatric inpatient care: A randomized controlled trial.认知行为治疗联合药物治疗对抑郁症患者的疗效:一项随机对照试验
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2022 Sep;29(5):1542-1555. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2733. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
9
Cognitive and Metacognitive Mechanisms of Change in Metacognitive Training for Depression.抑郁的元认知训练中改变的认知和元认知机制。
Sci Rep. 2017 Jun 14;7(1):3449. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-03626-8.
10
The efficacy of extended metacognitive training for psychosis: A randomized controlled trial.延长元认知训练对精神病的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
Schizophr Res. 2020 Jan;215:399-407. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2019.08.006. Epub 2019 Aug 27.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of behavioral activation play therapy in adolescents with depression: A study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.行为激活游戏疗法对青少年抑郁症的疗效:一项随机对照试验研究方案。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 20;19(6):e0304084. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304084. eCollection 2024.
2
A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of metacognitive training for older adults with depression (MCT-Silver) in Portugal: study protocol.一项评估葡萄牙针对老年抑郁症患者的元认知训练(MCT-Silver)疗效的随机对照试验:研究方案。
Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 31;14:1167860. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1167860. eCollection 2023.
3
T-RAC: Study protocol of a randomised clinical trial for assessing the acceptability and preliminary efficacy of adding an exergame-augmented dynamic imagery intervention to the behavioural activation treatment of depression.T-RAC:一项随机临床试验的研究方案,旨在评估在行为激活治疗抑郁症的基础上增加一项增强型运动游戏想象干预的可接受性和初步疗效。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 31;18(7):e0288910. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288910. eCollection 2023.
4
Goal Management Training and Computerized Cognitive Training in Depression-a 2-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial.抑郁症的目标管理训练与计算机化认知训练——一项随机对照试验的2年随访
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Sep 24;12:737518. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.737518. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Frequencies and Predictors of Negative Effects in Routine Inpatient and Outpatient Psychotherapy: Two Observational Studies.常规住院及门诊心理治疗中不良反应的发生率及预测因素:两项观察性研究
Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 25;11:2144. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02144. eCollection 2020.
2
Review of dysthymia and persistent depressive disorder: history, correlates, and clinical implications.心境恶劣障碍与持续性抑郁障碍综述:历史、相关因素及临床意义
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Sep;7(9):801-812. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30099-7.
3
Process expectations: Differences between therapists, patients, and lay individuals in their views of what works in psychotherapy.过程期望:治疗师、患者和非专业人士对心理治疗中哪些方法有效的看法存在差异。
J Clin Psychol. 2020 Jan;76(1):20-30. doi: 10.1002/jclp.22872. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
4
The role of outcome expectancy in therapeutic change across psychotherapy versus pharmacotherapy for depression.在抑郁症的心理治疗与药物治疗的疗效变化中,结果预期的作用。
J Affect Disord. 2019 May 15;251:121-129. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.01.046. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
5
The Negative Effects Questionnaire: psychometric properties of an instrument for assessing negative effects in psychological treatments.《负面效应问卷》:用于评估心理治疗中负面效应的工具的心理测量学特性。
Behav Cogn Psychother. 2019 Sep;47(5):559-572. doi: 10.1017/S1352465819000018. Epub 2019 Mar 15.
6
'I Just Stopped Going': A Mixed Methods Investigation Into Types of Therapy Dropout in Adolescents With Depression.“我只是不再去了”:一项关于青少年抑郁症治疗脱落类型的混合方法研究。
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 5;10:75. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00075. eCollection 2019.
7
Long-term efficacy of Metacognitive Training for Depression (D-MCT): A randomized controlled trial.抑郁的元认知训练的长期疗效(D-MCT):一项随机对照试验。
Br J Clin Psychol. 2019 Sep;58(3):245-259. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12213. Epub 2018 Dec 16.
8
[Definition and Decision-Making in the Determination and Detection of Side Effects of Psychotherapy].[心理治疗副作用的确定与检测中的定义及决策制定]
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2018 Sep;68(9-10):377-382. doi: 10.1055/a-0619-5949. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
9
Going meta on metacognitive interventions.对元认知干预进行元分析。
Expert Rev Neurother. 2018 Oct;18(10):739-741. doi: 10.1080/14737175.2018.1520636. Epub 2018 Sep 26.
10
It can't hurt, right? Adverse effects of psychotherapy in patients with depression.这不会有什么伤害,对吧?抑郁症患者心理治疗的不良反应。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2019 Aug;269(5):577-586. doi: 10.1007/s00406-018-0931-1. Epub 2018 Aug 7.