• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关键护理数据库高级研究(CEDAR):一种利用电子健康记录数据为重症监护病房提供支持的自动化方法。

Critical carE Database for Advanced Research (CEDAR): An automated method to support intensive care units with electronic health record data.

机构信息

Weill Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United States.

Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United States.

出版信息

J Biomed Inform. 2021 Jun;118:103789. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2021.103789. Epub 2021 Apr 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.jbi.2021.103789
PMID:33862230
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8187305/
Abstract

Patients treated in an intensive care unit (ICU) are critically ill and require life-sustaining organ failure support. Existing critical care data resources are limited to a select number of institutions, contain only ICU data, and do not enable the study of local changes in care patterns. To address these limitations, we developed the Critical carE Database for Advanced Research (CEDAR), a method for automating extraction and transformation of data from an electronic health record (EHR) system. Compared to an existing gold standard of manually collected data at our institution, CEDAR was statistically similar in most measures, including patient demographics and sepsis-related organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores. Additionally, CEDAR automated data extraction obviated the need for manual collection of 550 variables. Critically, during the spring 2020 COVID-19 surge in New York City, a modified version of CEDAR supported pandemic response efforts, including clinical operations and research. Other academic medical centers may find value in using the CEDAR method to automate data extraction from EHR systems to support ICU activities.

摘要

患者在重症监护病房(ICU)接受治疗,病情危急,需要维持生命的器官衰竭支持。现有的重症监护数据资源仅限于少数机构,仅包含 ICU 数据,并且无法研究护理模式的局部变化。为了解决这些限制,我们开发了 Critical carE Database for Advanced Research(CEDAR),这是一种从电子病历(EHR)系统中自动提取和转换数据的方法。与我们机构现有的手动收集数据的黄金标准相比,CEDAR 在大多数指标上具有统计学相似性,包括患者人口统计学和与脓毒症相关的器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分。此外,CEDAR 自动化数据提取免除了手动收集 550 个变量的需要。至关重要的是,在 2020 年春季纽约市 COVID-19 疫情高峰期,CEDAR 的一个修改版本支持了大流行应对工作,包括临床运营和研究。其他学术医疗中心可能会发现使用 CEDAR 方法从 EHR 系统中自动提取数据以支持 ICU 活动具有价值。

相似文献

1
Critical carE Database for Advanced Research (CEDAR): An automated method to support intensive care units with electronic health record data.关键护理数据库高级研究(CEDAR):一种利用电子健康记录数据为重症监护病房提供支持的自动化方法。
J Biomed Inform. 2021 Jun;118:103789. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2021.103789. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
2
The Dutch Data Warehouse, a multicenter and full-admission electronic health records database for critically ill COVID-19 patients.荷兰数据仓库,一个针对危重症 COVID-19 患者的多中心全入院电子健康记录数据库。
Crit Care. 2021 Aug 23;25(1):304. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03733-z.
3
Prospective validation of a near real-time EHR-integrated automated SOFA score calculator.近实时电子健康记录集成自动序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分计算器的前瞻性验证
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Jul;103:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.04.001. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
4
Comparative performance of intensive care mortality prediction models based on manually curated versus automatically extracted electronic health record data.基于人工编辑和自动提取电子健康记录数据的重症监护死亡率预测模型的比较性能。
Int J Med Inform. 2024 Aug;188:105477. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105477. Epub 2024 May 8.
5
A method for cohort selection of cardiovascular disease records from an electronic health record system.一种从电子健康记录系统中选择心血管疾病记录队列的方法。
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Jun;102:138-149. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.03.015. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
6
Patient and Family Engagement During Treatment Decisions in an ICU: A Discourse Analysis of the Electronic Health Record.患者和家属在 ICU 治疗决策中的参与:电子健康记录的话语分析。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Jun;47(6):784-791. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003711.
7
Critical Care Surge During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Implementation and Feedback From Frontline Providers.COVID-19 大流行期间的重症监护激增:一线医护人员的实施情况和反馈。
J Intensive Care Med. 2021 Feb;36(2):233-240. doi: 10.1177/0885066620973175.
8
Five novel clinical phenotypes for critically ill patients with mechanical ventilation in intensive care units: a retrospective and multi database study.重症监护病房机械通气危重症患者的五种新的临床表型:回顾性和多数据库研究。
Respir Res. 2020 Dec 10;21(1):325. doi: 10.1186/s12931-020-01588-6.
9
Time-Limited Trials of Intensive Care for Critically Ill Patients With Cancer: How Long Is Long Enough?限时重症监护治疗癌症危重症患者的临床试验:多长时间才算足够长?
JAMA Oncol. 2016 Jan;2(1):76-83. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.3336.
10
The use of an electronic medical record based automatic calculation tool to quantify risk of unplanned readmission to the intensive care unit: a validation study.利用电子病历的自动计算工具定量评估 ICU 非计划性再入院风险:一项验证性研究。
J Crit Care. 2011 Dec;26(6):634.e9-634.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2011.05.003. Epub 2011 Jun 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Multicenter target trial emulation to evaluate corticosteroids for sepsis stratified by predicted organ dysfunction trajectory.多中心目标试验模拟,以评估按预测的器官功能障碍轨迹分层的脓毒症患者使用皮质类固醇的情况。
Nat Commun. 2025 May 13;16(1):4450. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-59643-z.
2
Preparing for future pandemics: Automated intensive care electronic health record data extraction to accelerate clinical insights.为未来的大流行做准备:自动提取重症监护电子健康记录数据以加速临床洞察。
J Intensive Med. 2024 Nov 30;5(2):167-175. doi: 10.1016/j.jointm.2024.10.003. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
SOFA in sepsis: with or without GCS.

本文引用的文献

1
Obesity and COVID-19 in New York City: A Retrospective Cohort Study.纽约市的肥胖与新冠病毒病:一项回顾性队列研究
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Nov 17;173(10):855-858. doi: 10.7326/M20-2730. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
2
Respiratory Mechanics and Gas Exchange in COVID-19-associated Respiratory Failure.新型冠状病毒肺炎相关呼吸衰竭中的呼吸力学与气体交换
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2020 Sep;17(9):1158-1161. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202005-427RL.
3
INSMA: An integrated system for multimodal data acquisition and analysis in the intensive care unit.INSMA:一种用于重症监护病房多模态数据采集与分析的集成系统。
SOFA 在脓毒症中的应用:是否联合 GCS。
Eur J Med Res. 2024 May 24;29(1):296. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-01849-w.
4
Social Networks as a Key Health Determinant in Acute Illness Recovery: A Lesson from the COVID-19 Pandemic.社交网络作为急性疾病康复的关键健康决定因素:来自新冠疫情的教训
Am J Med. 2025 Mar;138(3):541-549.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2024.04.024. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
5
A methodology to facilitate critical care research using multiple linked electronic, clinical and administrative health records at population scale.一种利用大规模人群的多个电子、临床和行政健康记录进行重症监护研究的方法。
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2022 Jul 18;7(1):1724. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v7i1.1724. eCollection 2022.
6
Effect of Sepsis on Death as Modified by Solid Organ Transplantation.脓毒症对死亡的影响因实体器官移植而改变。
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023 Mar 18;10(4):ofad148. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofad148. eCollection 2023 Apr.
7
The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score: has the time come for an update?序贯器官衰竭评估 (SOFA) 评分:是否到了更新的时候?
Crit Care. 2023 Jan 13;27(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04290-9.
8
Comparison of a Target Trial Emulation Framework vs Cox Regression to Estimate the Association of Corticosteroids With COVID-19 Mortality.比较目标试验模拟框架与 Cox 回归估计皮质类固醇与 COVID-19 死亡率的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Oct 3;5(10):e2234425. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.34425.
9
Sepsis subphenotyping based on organ dysfunction trajectory.基于器官功能轨迹的脓毒症亚表型分型。
Crit Care. 2022 Jul 3;26(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04071-4.
10
Integrative metabolomic and proteomic signatures define clinical outcomes in severe COVID-19.整合代谢组学和蛋白质组学特征可确定重症 COVID-19 的临床结局。
iScience. 2022 Jul 15;25(7):104612. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104612. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
J Biomed Inform. 2020 Jun;106:103434. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103434. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
4
Clinical Characteristics of Covid-19 in New York City.纽约市新冠肺炎的临床特征
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jun 11;382(24):2372-2374. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2010419. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
5
On classifying sepsis heterogeneity in the ICU: insight using machine learning.在 ICU 中对脓毒症异质性进行分类:使用机器学习的见解。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Mar 1;27(3):437-443. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz211.
6
Axes of a revolution: challenges and promises of big data in healthcare.革命的轴心:大数据在医疗保健中的挑战与机遇。
Nat Med. 2020 Jan;26(1):29-38. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0727-5. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
7
Derivation, Validation, and Potential Treatment Implications of Novel Clinical Phenotypes for Sepsis.新型败血症临床表型的推导、验证及潜在治疗意义。
JAMA. 2019 May 28;321(20):2003-2017. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.5791.
8
Data-driven discovery of a novel sepsis pre-shock state predicts impending septic shock in the ICU.基于数据的新型脓毒症休克前状态发现可预测 ICU 中即将发生的脓毒症休克。
Sci Rep. 2019 Apr 16;9(1):6145. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-42637-5.
9
Identifying Novel Sepsis Subphenotypes Using Temperature Trajectories.利用体温轨迹识别新型脓毒症亚表型
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 Aug 1;200(3):327-335. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201806-1197OC.
10
The eICU Collaborative Research Database, a freely available multi-center database for critical care research.eICU 协作研究数据库,一个免费的多中心重症监护研究数据库。
Sci Data. 2018 Sep 11;5:180178. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2018.178.