• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

促进姑息治疗中的跨专业整合:服务生态系统视角。

Facilitating inter-professional integration in palliative care: A service ecosystem perspective.

机构信息

University of Liverpool Management School, Chatham Street, Liverpool, L69 7ZH, UK.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2021 May;277:113912. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113912. Epub 2021 Apr 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113912
PMID:33866083
Abstract

A paradigm shift toward healthcare inter-professional collaboration is leading to searches for ways to better facilitate integration. However, policy rhetoric often fails to acknowledge the complexity of healthcare service systems, and the difficulties involved in achieving successful collaborations. Consequently, more research is called for. We utilize the concept of a service ecosystem, a perspective currently prominent in service science, which is transforming the ways service systems are studied. This research aims to examine palliative care provision through a service ecosystem lens in order to uncover previously unidentified insights and opportunities for improvement. The palliative care ecosystem under study encompasses a defined geographical area of the UK. Data comprises pathographies (i.e., narratives of illness) with patients and their families (n = 31) and in-depth interviews with a variety of palliative care providers (n = 21), collected between 2017 and 2018. Capability issues comprising collaboration, coordination, and resource integration, together with communicating value all emerged as common themes impacting palliative care services. Taking a service ecosystem perspective, we also found shared intentionality for better integration and collaboration, with a desire among palliative care providers for the ecosystem's hospice organization to take the role of leader and facilitator. Acting on these findings, we demonstrate the ways new institutional arrangements provide a foundation for value cocreation. We make a contribution to the burgeoning service ecosystem literature which currently lacks empirical insights, particularly in health. We argue that in complex service systems such as healthcare, the focus must be on service design rather than organizational design, approached from the perspective of aggregation of service providers. We demonstrate empirically how reconfiguring resources and developing new institutional arrangements at the meso level can change micro-macro level interaction, enabling the emergence of new and enhanced value cocreation in palliative care.

摘要

向医疗保健跨专业合作的范式转变正在促使人们寻找更好的整合方法。然而,政策言辞往往未能认识到医疗保健服务系统的复杂性,以及实现成功合作所涉及的困难。因此,需要进行更多的研究。我们利用服务生态系统的概念,这是服务科学中当前突出的观点,它正在改变服务系统的研究方式。本研究旨在通过服务生态系统的视角来考察姑息治疗服务的提供,以揭示以前未被发现的见解和改进机会。研究中的姑息治疗生态系统涵盖了英国的一个特定地理区域。数据包括患者及其家属的病史(即疾病叙述)(n=31)和对各种姑息治疗提供者的深入访谈(n=21),这些数据是在 2017 年至 2018 年间收集的。能力问题包括合作、协调和资源整合,以及沟通价值,这些问题共同成为影响姑息治疗服务的共同主题。从服务生态系统的角度来看,我们还发现了更好的整合和合作的共同意图,姑息治疗提供者希望生态系统中的临终关怀组织承担领导和促进者的角色。根据这些发现,我们展示了新的制度安排为价值共创提供基础的方式。我们为正在兴起的服务生态系统文献做出了贡献,该文献目前缺乏健康领域的经验见解。我们认为,在医疗等复杂的服务系统中,重点必须放在服务设计上,而不是组织设计上,要从服务提供者聚合的角度来考虑。我们从经验上展示了如何在中观层面重新配置资源和发展新的制度安排,从而改变微观-宏观层面的互动,使姑息治疗中出现新的和增强的价值共创。

相似文献

1
Facilitating inter-professional integration in palliative care: A service ecosystem perspective.促进姑息治疗中的跨专业整合:服务生态系统视角。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 May;277:113912. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113912. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
2
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
3
The need for a Serious Illness Digital Ecosystem (SIDE) to improve outcomes for patients receiving palliative and hospice care.需要建立一个严重疾病数字生态系统(SIDE),以改善接受姑息治疗和临终关怀的患者的结局。
Am J Manag Care. 2020 Apr;26(4 Spec No.):SP124-SP126. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2020.42960.
4
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
5
The Harry R. Horvitz Center for Palliative Medicine (1987-1999): development of a novel comprehensive integrated program.哈里·R·霍维茨姑息医学中心(1987 - 1999年):一个全新综合项目的发展历程
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2001 Jul-Aug;18(4):239-50. doi: 10.1177/104990910101800408.
6
How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?“护理路径技术”对卒中护理服务整合的影响是如何衡量的,以及有哪些证据支持其在这方面的有效性?
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Mar;6(1):78-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2007.00098.x.
7
Development of empirical recommendations for regional hospice and palliative care networks in Germany: A qualitative study.德国地区临终关怀与姑息治疗网络实证建议的制定:一项定性研究。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2019 Mar;140:35-42. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2018.11.007. Epub 2018 Dec 24.
8
Healthcare professionals' experiences of inter-professional collaboration during patient's transfers between care settings in palliative care: A focus group study.医护专业人员在姑息治疗中患者转介到不同医疗场所时的跨专业合作体验:一项焦点小组研究。
Palliat Med. 2021 Feb;35(2):355-366. doi: 10.1177/0269216320968741. Epub 2020 Oct 30.
9
The involvement of volunteers in palliative care and their collaboration with healthcare professionals: A cross-sectional volunteer survey across the Flemish healthcare system (Belgium).志愿者在姑息治疗中的参与及其与医疗保健专业人员的合作:弗拉芒医疗保健系统(比利时)的横断面志愿者调查。
Health Soc Care Community. 2020 May;28(3):747-761. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12905. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
10
Enhancing integrated palliative care: what models are appropriate? A cross-case analysis.强化姑息治疗综合服务:哪些模式较为适宜?跨案例分析
BMC Palliat Care. 2017 Nov 28;16(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12904-017-0250-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding the acute care context to inform palliative care improvements: a qualitative study of hospital-based multidisciplinary clinicians.了解急性护理背景以促进姑息治疗改善:一项针对医院多学科临床医生的定性研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Jul 2;24(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01815-1.
2
Networks for healthcare delivery: a systematic literature review.医疗保健提供网络:系统文献综述。
J Health Organ Manag. 2024 Nov 6;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print):36-53. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-09-2023-0262.
3
A qualitative exploration of online forums to support resilience of rural young people in Australia.
一项关于在线论坛以支持澳大利亚农村青年适应力的定性探索。
Front Public Health. 2024 May 22;12:1335476. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1335476. eCollection 2024.
4
'Thank goodness you're here'. Exploring the impact on patients, family carers and staff of enhanced 7-day specialist palliative care services: A mixed methods study.“谢天谢地你来了”。探讨强化 7 天专科姑息治疗服务对患者、家属照顾者和工作人员的影响:一项混合方法研究。
Palliat Med. 2023 Dec;37(10):1484-1497. doi: 10.1177/02692163231201486. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
5
Stakeholder perspectives on the preferred service ecosystem for senior citizens living at home: a qualitative interview study.利益相关者对居家老年人首选服务生态系统的观点:一项定性访谈研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Sep 19;23(1):576. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04303-4.
6
A task service and a talking service: A qualitative exploration of bereaved family perceptions of community nursing care at the end of life.一项任务服务和一项通话服务:对临终社区护理的丧亲家庭认知的定性探索。
Palliat Med. 2022 Dec;36(10):1522-1531. doi: 10.1177/02692163221127168. Epub 2022 Oct 20.