• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于应对新冠疫情的接触者追踪应用程序:对新自由主义社会面临的挑战及未来方向的系统文献综述

Contact tracing apps for the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic literature review of challenges and future directions for neo-liberal societies.

作者信息

Akinbi Alex, Forshaw Mark, Blinkhorn Victoria

机构信息

School of Computer Science and Mathematics, Liverpool John Moores University, James Parsons Building, Liverpool, UK.

School of Psychology, Liverpool John Moores University, Tom Reilly Building, Liverpool, UK.

出版信息

Health Inf Sci Syst. 2021 Apr 13;9(1):18. doi: 10.1007/s13755-021-00147-7. eCollection 2021 Dec.

DOI:10.1007/s13755-021-00147-7
PMID:33868671
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8042619/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The COVID-19 pandemic has spread with increased fatalities around the world and has become an international public health crisis. Public health authorities in many countries have introduced contact tracing apps to track and trace infected persons as part of measures to contain the spread of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Coronavirus 2. However, there are major concerns about its efficacy and privacy which affects mass acceptance amongst a population. This systematic literature review encompasses the current challenges facing this technology and recommendations to address such challenges in the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic in neo-liberal societies.

METHODS

The systematic literature review was conducted by searching databases of Google Scholar, Web of Science, PubMed, IEEE Xplore Digital Library, PsycInfo and ScienceDirect using the search terms ("" "") ("" "") to identify relevant literature. The searches were run against the title, keywords, or abstract, depending on the search platforms. The searches were conducted between January 1, 2020, through 31st January 2021. Further inputs were also taken from preprints, published government and technical reports. We explore and discuss from the selected literature, the key challenges and issues that influence unwillingness to use these contact tracing apps in neo-liberal societies which include the plausibility of abuse of user privacy rights and lack of trust in the government and public health authorities by their citizens. Other challenges identified and discussed include ethical issues, security vulnerabilities, user behaviour and participation, and technical constraints.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Finally, in the analysis of this systematic literature review, recommendations to address these challenges, future directions, and considerations in the use of digital contact tracing apps and related technologies to contain the spread of future pandemic outbreaks are presented. For policy makers in neo-liberal societies, this study provides an in-depth review of issues that must be addressed. We highlight recommendations to improve the willingness to use such digital technologies and could facilitate mass acceptance amongst users.

摘要

目的

新冠疫情已在全球蔓延,死亡人数不断增加,成为一场国际公共卫生危机。许多国家的公共卫生当局推出了接触者追踪应用程序,以追踪感染者,作为遏制严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2传播措施的一部分。然而,人们对其有效性和隐私性存在重大担忧,这影响了民众的广泛接受度。本系统文献综述涵盖了这项技术目前面临的挑战,以及在新自由主义社会抗击新冠疫情中应对这些挑战的建议。

方法

通过在谷歌学术、科学网、PubMed、IEEE Xplore数字图书馆、PsycInfo和科学Direct数据库中搜索,使用搜索词(“” “”) (“” “”)来识别相关文献,进行系统文献综述。根据搜索平台的不同,搜索针对标题、关键词或摘要进行。搜索在2020年1月1日至2021年1月31日期间进行。还从预印本、已发表的政府和技术报告中获取了更多信息。我们从选定的文献中探讨并讨论了影响新自由主义社会中不愿使用这些接触者追踪应用程序的关键挑战和问题,包括滥用用户隐私权的可能性以及公民对政府和公共卫生当局缺乏信任。确定并讨论的其他挑战包括伦理问题、安全漏洞、用户行为和参与度以及技术限制。

结果与结论

最后,在对本系统文献综述的分析中,提出了应对这些挑战的建议、未来方向,以及在使用数字接触者追踪应用程序和相关技术遏制未来大流行疫情传播方面的考虑因素。对于新自由主义社会的政策制定者来说,本研究对必须解决的问题进行了深入综述。我们强调了提高使用此类数字技术意愿的建议,并可促进用户的广泛接受。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1973/8044270/f4b690813ec4/13755_2021_147_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1973/8044270/deb1d42458ce/13755_2021_147_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1973/8044270/94ddfe794f64/13755_2021_147_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1973/8044270/f4b690813ec4/13755_2021_147_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1973/8044270/deb1d42458ce/13755_2021_147_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1973/8044270/94ddfe794f64/13755_2021_147_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1973/8044270/f4b690813ec4/13755_2021_147_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Contact tracing apps for the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic literature review of challenges and future directions for neo-liberal societies.用于应对新冠疫情的接触者追踪应用程序:对新自由主义社会面临的挑战及未来方向的系统文献综述
Health Inf Sci Syst. 2021 Apr 13;9(1):18. doi: 10.1007/s13755-021-00147-7. eCollection 2021 Dec.
2
Factors Influencing the Adoption of Contact Tracing Applications: Systematic Review and Recommendations.影响接触者追踪应用程序采用的因素:系统评价与建议
Front Digit Health. 2022 May 3;4:862466. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.862466. eCollection 2022.
3
Technology, Privacy, and User Opinions of COVID-19 Mobile Apps for Contact Tracing: Systematic Search and Content Analysis.技术、隐私和用户对 COVID-19 移动接触追踪应用程序的看法:系统搜索和内容分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 9;23(2):e23467. doi: 10.2196/23467.
4
Best Practice Guidance for Digital Contact Tracing Apps: A Cross-disciplinary Review of the Literature.数字接触者追踪应用程序的最佳实践指南:文献的跨学科综述。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jun 7;9(6):e27753. doi: 10.2196/27753.
5
State of the Art in Adoption of Contact Tracing Apps and Recommendations Regarding Privacy Protection and Public Health: Systematic Review.接触者追踪应用程序的应用现状以及关于隐私保护和公共卫生的建议:系统评价
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jun 10;9(6):e23250. doi: 10.2196/23250.
6
Effectiveness, Policy, and User Acceptance of COVID-19 Contact-Tracing Apps in the Post-COVID-19 Pandemic Era: Experience and Comparative Study.新冠疫情后时代的 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用的效果、政策和用户接受度:经验与比较研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 Oct 27;8(10):e40233. doi: 10.2196/40233.
7
Factors Influencing the Adoption of Contact Tracing Applications: Protocol for a Systematic Review.影响接触者追踪应用程序采用的因素:系统评价方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Jun 1;10(6):e28961. doi: 10.2196/28961.
8
Early Perceptions of COVID-19 Contact Tracing Apps in German-Speaking Countries: Comparative Mixed Methods Study.德语国家对 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序的早期看法:比较混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 8;23(2):e25525. doi: 10.2196/25525.
9
Citizen-Centered Mobile Health Apps Collecting Individual-Level Spatial Data for Infectious Disease Management: Scoping Review.以公民为中心的移动健康应用程序收集传染病管理的个体层面空间数据:范围综述。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Nov 10;8(11):e22594. doi: 10.2196/22594.
10
Telehealth interventions during COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review of applications, challenges, privacy and security issues.新冠疫情期间的远程医疗干预措施:应用、挑战、隐私和安全问题的范围综述。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2023 Aug;30(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2022-100676.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimizing emergency response systems in urban health crises: A project management approach to public health preparedness and response.优化城市卫生危机中的应急系统:一种公共卫生防范与应对的项目管理方法。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jan 17;104(3):e41279. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041279.
2
Factors driving the acceptance of COVID-19 pandemic mobile contact tracing apps: The influence of security and privacy concerns.推动COVID-19大流行期间移动接触者追踪应用程序被接受的因素:安全和隐私问题的影响。
Heliyon. 2024 Oct 9;10(20):e39086. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39086. eCollection 2024 Oct 30.
3
Predictors of the continuous use of an infectious disease self-management app for epidemiological investigations: a survey of young and middle-aged adults in South Korean citizens.

本文引用的文献

1
A socio-technical framework for digital contact tracing.数字接触追踪的社会技术框架。
Results Eng. 2020 Dec;8:100163. doi: 10.1016/j.rineng.2020.100163. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
2
A First Look at Privacy Analysis of COVID-19 Contact-Tracing Mobile Applications.新冠疫情接触者追踪移动应用的隐私分析初探。
IEEE Internet Things J. 2020 Sep 17;8(21):15796-15806. doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2020.3024180. eCollection 2021 Nov 1.
3
COVID-19 Contact Tracing: Challenges and Future Directions.2019冠状病毒病接触者追踪:挑战与未来方向
用于传染病自我管理的应用程序的连续使用的预测因素:对韩国公民中年轻和中年成年人的调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 16;24(1):1419. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11937-6.
4
Survey of Citizens' Preferences for Combined Contact Tracing App Features During a Pandemic: Conjoint Analysis.在大流行期间对公民对联合接触者追踪应用程序功能偏好的调查:联合分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Nov 14;10:e53340. doi: 10.2196/53340.
5
Mobile Apps for COVID-19: A Systematic Review of Reviews.用于 COVID-19 的移动应用程序:综述的系统评价
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jan 8;12(2):139. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12020139.
6
'We are not here to enforce; we are here for the people' Factors influencing performance of contact tracing during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study.“我们来此不是为了强制;我们是为人民而来。”影响新冠疫情期间接触者追踪工作成效的因素:一项定性研究
J Public Health Res. 2023 Nov 24;12(4):22799036231208325. doi: 10.1177/22799036231208325. eCollection 2023 Oct.
7
Personal Information Protection and Privacy Policy Compliance of Health Code Apps in China: Scale Development and Content Analysis.中国健康码应用程序的个人信息保护和隐私政策合规性:量表开发与内容分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023 Nov 14;11:e48714. doi: 10.2196/48714.
8
Adoption of a COVID-19 Contact Tracing App by Czech Youth: Cross-Cultural Replication Study.采用 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序的捷克青年:跨文化复制研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2023 Nov 16;10:e45481. doi: 10.2196/45481.
9
COVID-19 Contact Tracing Strategies During the First Wave of the Pandemic: Systematic Review of Published Studies.COVID-19 大流行期间的接触者追踪策略:已发表研究的系统评价。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Jun 23;9:e42678. doi: 10.2196/42678.
10
The strategies of private higher educational institutions during the Covid-19 pandemic. A review of literature.新冠疫情期间私立高等教育机构的策略。文献综述。
Soc Sci Humanit Open. 2023;8(1):100581. doi: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100581. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
IEEE Access. 2020 Nov 9;8:225703-225729. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3036718. eCollection 2020.
4
Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Big Data for Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic: A Survey on the State-of-the-Arts.用于冠状病毒(COVID-19)大流行的人工智能(AI)与大数据:技术现状综述
IEEE Access. 2020 Jul 15;8:130820-130839. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3009328. eCollection 2020.
5
Evaluating How Smartphone Contact Tracing Technology Can Reduce the Spread of Infectious Diseases: The Case of COVID-19.评估智能手机接触者追踪技术如何减少传染病传播:以COVID-19为例。
IEEE Access. 2020 May 27;8:99083-99097. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2998042. eCollection 2020.
6
Covid notions: Towards formal definitions - and documented understanding - of privacy goals and claimed protection in proximity-tracing services.新冠概念:迈向对接近追踪服务中的隐私目标及所宣称的保护进行形式化定义和有记录的理解。
Online Soc Netw Media. 2021 Mar;22:100125. doi: 10.1016/j.osnem.2021.100125. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
7
Where England's pandemic response to COVID-19 went wrong.英国应对新冠疫情错在哪里。
Public Health. 2021 Mar;192:45-48. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.11.015. Epub 2020 Nov 21.
8
Privacy-preserving contact tracing in 5G-integrated and blockchain-based medical applications.5G集成与区块链医疗应用中的隐私保护接触者追踪
Comput Stand Interfaces. 2021 Aug;77:103520. doi: 10.1016/j.csi.2021.103520. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
9
Information Safety Assurances Increase Intentions to Use COVID-19 Contact Tracing Applications, Regardless of Autonomy-Supportive or Controlling Message Framing.信息安全保障会增加使用新冠病毒接触者追踪应用程序的意愿,无论信息框架是自主支持型还是控制型。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 7;11:591638. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.591638. eCollection 2020.
10
Privacy concerns can explain unwillingness to download and use contact tracing apps when COVID-19 concerns are high.隐私担忧可以解释在对新冠疫情高度担忧时,人们不愿下载和使用接触者追踪应用程序的原因。
Comput Human Behav. 2021 Jun;119:106718. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106718. Epub 2021 Jan 28.