• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A Quantized Representation of Intertemporal Choice in the Brain.大脑中跨期选择的量化表征。
IEEE Trans Mol Biol Multiscale Commun. 2021 Mar;7(1):1-9. doi: 10.1109/TMBMC.2020.3025244. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
2
A Quantized Representation of Probability in the Brain.大脑中概率的量化表示。
IEEE Trans Mol Biol Multiscale Commun. 2019 Oct;5(1):19-29. doi: 10.1109/tmbmc.2019.2950182. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
3
Variable time preference.可变时间偏好。
Cogn Psychol. 2019 Jun;111:53-79. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2019.03.003. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
4
The Attraction Effect Modulates Reward Prediction Errors and Intertemporal Choices.吸引力效应调节奖励预测误差和跨期选择。
J Neurosci. 2017 Jan 11;37(2):371-382. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2532-16.2016.
5
Money earlier or later? Simple heuristics explain intertemporal choices better than delay discounting does.早得钱还是晚得钱?简单启发式策略比延迟折扣更能解释跨期选择。
Psychol Sci. 2015 Jun;26(6):826-33. doi: 10.1177/0956797615572232. Epub 2015 Apr 24.
6
Monkeys are more patient in a foraging task than in a standard intertemporal choice task.猴子在觅食任务中比在标准的跨期选择任务中更有耐心。
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 11;10(2):e0117057. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117057. eCollection 2015.
7
Relationship between an inconsistent degree of financial literacy and inconsistent decision-making in intertemporal choices.金融素养的不一致程度与跨期选择中决策不一致之间的关系。
Heliyon. 2024 Feb 29;10(5):e27253. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27253. eCollection 2024 Mar 15.
8
Weighing outcomes by time or against time? Evaluation rules in intertemporal choice.权衡时间或与时间的结果?跨期选择中的评价规则。
Cogn Sci. 2014 Apr;38(3):399-438. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12104. Epub 2014 Jan 10.
9
Queuing theory under competitive social foraging may explain a mathematical equivalence of delay and probability in impulsive decision-making.竞争社会觅食情境下的排队理论或许能解释冲动决策中延迟与概率的数学等效性。
Med Hypotheses. 2006;67(2):276-9. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2006.02.016. Epub 2006 Mar 30.
10
Positive temporal dependence of the biological clock implies hyperbolic discounting.生物钟的正向时间依赖性意味着双曲线贴现。
Front Neurosci. 2011 Jan 28;5:2. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2011.00002. eCollection 2011.

引用本文的文献

1
Editorial: Advances in Shannon-based communications and computations approaches to understanding information processing in the brain.社论:基于香农理论的通信与计算方法在理解大脑信息处理方面的进展。
Front Comput Neurosci. 2024 Jan 4;17:1352772. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2023.1352772. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
A Quantized Representation of Probability in the Brain.大脑中概率的量化表示。
IEEE Trans Mol Biol Multiscale Commun. 2019 Oct;5(1):19-29. doi: 10.1109/tmbmc.2019.2950182. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
2
BOLD subjective value signals exhibit robust range adaptation.血氧水平依赖性功能磁共振成像主观价值信号表现出强大的范围适应性。
J Neurosci. 2014 Dec 3;34(49):16533-43. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3927-14.2014.
3
Focusing attention on the health aspects of foods changes value signals in vmPFC and improves dietary choice.关注食物的健康方面会改变 vmPFC 中的价值信号,从而改善饮食选择。
J Neurosci. 2011 Jul 27;31(30):11077-87. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6383-10.2011.
4
A discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabilistic rewards.一种用于具有延迟和概率性奖励的选择的折扣框架。
Psychol Bull. 2004 Sep;130(5):769-92. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.130.5.769.
5
Hyperbolic temporal discounting in social drinkers and problem drinkers.社交饮酒者和问题饮酒者中的双曲时间折扣
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 1998 Aug;6(3):292-305. doi: 10.1037//1064-1297.6.3.292.

大脑中跨期选择的量化表征。

A Quantized Representation of Intertemporal Choice in the Brain.

作者信息

Tee James, Taylor Desmond P

机构信息

Department of Psychology, New York University.

Communications Research Group, Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch 8020, New Zealand.

出版信息

IEEE Trans Mol Biol Multiscale Commun. 2021 Mar;7(1):1-9. doi: 10.1109/TMBMC.2020.3025244. Epub 2020 Sep 21.

DOI:10.1109/TMBMC.2020.3025244
PMID:33869666
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8049087/
Abstract

Value [4][5] is typically modeled using a continuous representation (i.e., a Real number). A discrete representation of value has recently been postulated [6]. A quantized representation of probability in the brain was also posited and supported by experimental data [7]. Value and probability are inter-related via Prospect Theory [4][5]. In this paper, we hypothesize that intertemporal choices may also be quantized. For example, people may treat (or discount) 16 days indifferently to 17 days. To test this, we analyzed an intertemporal task by using 2 novel models: quantized hyperbolic discounting, and quantized exponential discounting. Our work here is a re-examination of the behavioral data previously collected for an fMRI study [8]. Both quantized hyperbolic and quantized exponential models were compared using AIC and BIC tests. We found that 13/20 participants were best fit to the quantized exponential model, while the remaining 7/20 were best fit to the quantized hyperbolic model. Overall, 15/20 participants were best fit to models with a 5-bit precision (i.e., 2 = 32 steps). In conclusion, regardless of hyperbolic or exponential, quantized versions of these models are better fit to the experimental data than their continuous forms. We finally outline some potential applications of our findings.

摘要

值[4][5]通常使用连续表示(即实数)来建模。最近有人提出了值的离散表示[6]。大脑中概率的量化表示也已被提出,并得到了实验数据的支持[7]。值和概率通过前景理论相互关联[4][5]。在本文中,我们假设跨期选择也可能是量化的。例如,人们可能对16天和17天无差异对待(或贴现)。为了验证这一点,我们使用两种新模型分析了一个跨期任务:量化双曲线贴现和量化指数贴现。我们这里的工作是对之前为一项功能磁共振成像研究收集的行为数据的重新审视[8]。使用AIC和BIC检验对量化双曲线模型和量化指数模型进行了比较。我们发现,20名参与者中有13名最适合量化指数模型,而其余7名最适合量化双曲线模型。总体而言,20名参与者中有15名最适合精度为5位(即2 = 32步)的模型。总之,无论双曲线还是指数模型,这些模型的量化版本都比其连续形式更适合实验数据。我们最后概述了我们研究结果的一些潜在应用。