Russo Carlo, Simeone Mariarosaria, Demartini Eugenio, Marescotti Maria Elena, Gaviglio Anna
Department of Economics and Law, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, Italy.
Department of Law, Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods (D.E.M.M.), University of Sannio (BN), Italy.
Heliyon. 2021 Mar 29;7(4):e06607. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06607. eCollection 2021 Apr.
In this paper, we investigate the short-term and long-term effects of the COVID-19 emergency on consumers' decision of changing dietary habit. We used a certified dataset reporting information about 456 Italian consumers during the lockdown in the first wave of the pandemic emergency (April 2020). The survey collected data about changes in food purchases, respondents' mood during the lockdown, conspiracist beliefs, exposure to the virus, and planned food purchasing behavior after the lockdown. We used the data to construct measures of the psychological pressure exerted by the COVID-19 emergency on consumers. We use an endogenous selection regression model to assess the impact of psychological pressure on the decision of changing food purchased. The analysis identified two opposite approaches to change in food purchasing decisions: impulsive approach and reflective approach. The former is associated with a higher probability of changing food purchase but a lower probability to keep the changes in the long run than the latter. Our results suggest that COVID-19 psychological pressure was associated with impulsive approach to buy food. Consequently, food-purchasing behavior is expected to revert to pre-COVID 19 habits when the emergency is over.
在本文中,我们研究了新冠疫情紧急状态对消费者改变饮食习惯决策的短期和长期影响。我们使用了一个经过认证的数据集,该数据集报告了在疫情紧急状态第一波封锁期间(2020年4月)456名意大利消费者的信息。该调查收集了有关食品购买变化、封锁期间受访者的情绪、阴谋论信念、接触病毒情况以及封锁后计划的食品购买行为的数据。我们使用这些数据构建了新冠疫情紧急状态对消费者施加的心理压力的衡量指标。我们使用内生选择回归模型来评估心理压力对改变所购买食品决策的影响。分析确定了食品购买决策变化的两种相反方式:冲动型方式和反思型方式。与后者相比,前者改变食品购买的可能性更高,但从长远来看保持这些变化的可能性更低。我们的结果表明,新冠疫情心理压力与冲动型购买食品方式相关。因此,当紧急状态结束时,食品购买行为预计会恢复到新冠疫情前的习惯。