• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ID NOW 与 RT-PCR 检测门诊人群中 SARS-CoV-2 的敏感性。

Sensitivity of ID NOW and RT-PCR for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in an ambulatory population.

机构信息

Urgent Care, The Everett Clinic-Part of Optum, Everett, United States.

Department of Pathology, James J Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, United States.

出版信息

Elife. 2021 Apr 20;10:e65726. doi: 10.7554/eLife.65726.

DOI:10.7554/eLife.65726
PMID:33876726
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8081522/
Abstract

Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) requires confirmation by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Abbott ID NOW provides fast results but has been criticized for low sensitivity. Here we determine the sensitivity of ID NOW in an ambulatory population presented for testing. The study enrolled 785 symptomatic patients, of whom 21 were positive by both ID NOW and RT-PCR, and 2 only by RT-PCR. All 189 asymptomatic patients tested negative. The positive percent agreement between the ID NOW assay and the RT-PCR assay was 91.3%, and negative percent agreement was 100%. The results from the current study were included into a larger systematic review of literature where at least 20 subjects were simultaneously tested using ID NOW and RT-PCR. The overall sensitivity for ID NOW assay was calculated at 84% (95% confidence interval 55-96%) and had the highest correlation to RT-PCR at viral loads most likely to be associated with transmissible infections.

摘要

SARS-CoV-2(COVID-19)的诊断需要通过逆转录-聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)进行确认。Abbott ID NOW 提供快速的结果,但因其灵敏度低而受到批评。在这里,我们确定了 ID NOW 在门诊人群中进行检测的灵敏度。该研究纳入了 785 名有症状的患者,其中 21 名患者的 ID NOW 和 RT-PCR 检测均为阳性,而只有 2 名患者的 RT-PCR 检测为阳性。所有 189 名无症状患者的检测结果均为阴性。ID NOW 检测与 RT-PCR 检测的阳性符合率为 91.3%,阴性符合率为 100%。当前研究的结果被纳入了一项更大的文献系统评价中,其中至少有 20 名患者同时使用 ID NOW 和 RT-PCR 进行了检测。ID NOW 检测的总灵敏度为 84%(95%置信区间为 55-96%),与 RT-PCR 的相关性最高,与最有可能导致传染性感染的病毒载量相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a362/8081522/61719afb7e9a/elife-65726-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a362/8081522/840d19d09004/elife-65726-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a362/8081522/22cfd26ba9d7/elife-65726-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a362/8081522/1e1981f49889/elife-65726-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a362/8081522/61719afb7e9a/elife-65726-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a362/8081522/840d19d09004/elife-65726-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a362/8081522/22cfd26ba9d7/elife-65726-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a362/8081522/1e1981f49889/elife-65726-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a362/8081522/61719afb7e9a/elife-65726-fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
Sensitivity of ID NOW and RT-PCR for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in an ambulatory population.ID NOW 与 RT-PCR 检测门诊人群中 SARS-CoV-2 的敏感性。
Elife. 2021 Apr 20;10:e65726. doi: 10.7554/eLife.65726.
2
A semi-automated, isolation-free, high-throughput SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcriptase (RT) loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) test.一种半自动、无需隔离、高通量的严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)逆转录(RT)环介导等温扩增(LAMP)检测方法。
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 1;11(1):21385. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-00827-0.
3
Diagnostic accuracy of the Cepheid Xpert Xpress and the Abbott ID NOW assay for rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Cepheid Xpert Xpress 和 Abbott ID NOW 检测试剂盒快速检测 SARS-CoV-2 的诊断准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Virol. 2021 Jul;93(7):4523-4531. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26994. Epub 2021 May 3.
4
Performance of Abbott ID Now COVID-19 Rapid Nucleic Acid Amplification Test Using Nasopharyngeal Swabs Transported in Viral Transport Media and Dry Nasal Swabs in a New York City Academic Institution.雅培 ID Now COVID-19 快速核酸扩增检测试剂使用鼻咽拭子和干鼻拭子在纽约市学术机构中运输的病毒运输介质的性能。
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Jul 23;58(8). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01136-20.
5
Comparative Evaluation of Cartridge-Based Abbott ID NOW Test With Probe-Based Real-Time Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for Detection of SARS-CoV-2.基于试剂盒的雅培ID NOW检测与基于探针的实时逆转录聚合酶链反应检测法对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)检测的比较评估
Cureus. 2022 Feb 21;14(2):e22470. doi: 10.7759/cureus.22470. eCollection 2022 Feb.
6
Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of the Pluslife Mini Dock RHAM technology with Abbott ID Now and Cepheid GenXpert: A retrospective evaluation study.Pluslife Mini Dock RHAM 技术与 Abbott ID Now 和 Cepheid GenXpert 的诊断准确性比较:一项回顾性评估研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 17;14(1):13978. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64406-9.
7
Comparison of abbott ID NOW COVID-19 rapid molecular assay to cepheid xpert xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay in dry nasal swabs.雅培ID NOW新型冠状病毒肺炎快速分子检测法与赛沛Xpert Xpress新型冠状病毒检测法在干燥鼻拭子中的比较。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021 Apr;99(4):115208. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2020.115208. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
8
Molecular Mirror Technology Facilitates High-Throughput, Accurate SARS-CoV-2 Testing.分子镜技术助力高通量、高精准度的 SARS-CoV-2 检测。
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Sep 3;9(1):e0039221. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00392-21. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
9
Evaluation of water gargle samples for SARS-CoV-2 detection using Abbott ID NOW COVID-19 assay.使用雅培 ID NOW COVID-19 检测试剂盒评估用于 SARS-CoV-2 检测的漱口样本。
J Med Virol. 2022 Sep;94(9):4522-4527. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27847. Epub 2022 May 18.
10
Evaluation of six different rapid methods for nucleic acid detection of SARS-COV-2 virus.评价六种不同的 SARS-CoV-2 病毒核酸快速检测方法。
J Med Virol. 2021 Sep;93(9):5538-5543. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27090. Epub 2021 Jun 8.

引用本文的文献

1
[Implementation of isotermic PCR for detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus].[等温聚合酶链反应用于检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2的实施]
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2024 May 6;62(3):1-6. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10998931.
2
Intensified screening for SARS-CoV-2 in 18 emergency departments in the Paris metropolitan area, France (DEPIST-COVID): A cluster-randomized, two-period, crossover trial.法国巴黎大都市区 18 家急诊部门加强 SARS-CoV-2 筛查(DEPIST-COVID):一项集群随机、两期、交叉试验。
PLoS Med. 2023 Dec 7;20(12):e1004317. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004317. eCollection 2023 Dec.
3
Improvement of Sensitivity and Speed of Virus Sensing Technologies Using nm- and μm-Scale Components.

本文引用的文献

1
Test sensitivity is secondary to frequency and turnaround time for COVID-19 screening.新冠病毒筛查时,检测敏感性次于检测频率和周转时间。
Sci Adv. 2021 Jan 1;7(1). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abd5393. Print 2021 Jan.
2
Rethinking Covid-19 Test Sensitivity - A Strategy for Containment.重新思考新冠病毒检测敏感性——一种遏制策略。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Nov 26;383(22):e120. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2025631. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
3
Comparative study of four SARS-CoV-2 Nucleic Acid Amplification Test (NAAT) platforms demonstrates that ID NOW performance is impaired substantially by patient and specimen type.
利用纳米和微米级组件提高病毒感测技术的灵敏度和速度。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jul 31;23(15):6830. doi: 10.3390/s23156830.
4
Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Based on Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests (NAATs) and Its Integration into Nanomedicine and Microfluidic Devices as Point-of-Care Testing (POCT).基于核酸扩增检测 (NAATs) 的 SARS-CoV-2 检测及其作为即时检测 (POCT) 整合到纳米医学和微流控装置中。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jun 16;24(12):10233. doi: 10.3390/ijms241210233.
5
Point-of-Care Testing for SARS-CoV-2: A Prospective Study in a Primary Health Centre.2019冠状病毒病即时检测:在初级卫生保健中心的一项前瞻性研究
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 May 28;13(11):1888. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13111888.
6
COVID-19 Antigen Results Correlate with the Quantity of Replication-Competent SARS-CoV-2 in a Cross-Sectional Study of Ambulatory Adults during the Delta Wave.在一项针对三角洲波期间门诊成年人的横断面研究中,COVID-19 抗原检测结果与具有复制能力的 SARS-CoV-2 数量相关。
Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Jun 15;11(3):e0006423. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00064-23. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
7
An analysis of emergency surgery on coronavirus disease positive patients and their outcomes during the coronavirus pandemic: A retrospective observational study.新型冠状病毒大流行期间冠状病毒病阳性患者的急诊手术及其结果分析:一项回顾性观察研究。
Med J Armed Forces India. 2023 Feb 3;80(1):68-73. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2022.12.006.
8
Sensibility and Specificity of the VitaPCR™ SARS-CoV-2 Assay for the Rapid Diagnosis of COVID-19 in Older Adults in the Emergency Department.VitaPCR™ SARS-CoV-2 检测用于急诊科老年 COVID-19 快速诊断的敏感性和特异性。
Viruses. 2023 Jan 9;15(1):189. doi: 10.3390/v15010189.
9
A complete blood count-based multivariate model for predicting the recovery of patients with moderate COVID-19: a retrospective study.基于全血细胞计数的多元模型预测中度 COVID-19 患者的康复:一项回顾性研究。
Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 29;12(1):18262. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-23285-8.
10
Miniaturized Real-Time PCR systems for SARS-CoV-2 detection at the Point-of-Care.用于即时护理点 SARS-CoV-2 检测的微型化实时 PCR 系统。
Clin Chim Acta. 2022 Nov 1;536:104-111. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2022.09.014. Epub 2022 Sep 17.
四项 SARS-CoV-2 核酸扩增检测(NAAT)平台的比较研究表明,ID NOW 平台的性能受到患者和标本类型的显著影响。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021 Jan;99(1):115200. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2020.115200. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
4
Upper respiratory viral load in asymptomatic individuals and mildly symptomatic patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.无症状个体和 SARS-CoV-2 感染轻症患者的上呼吸道病毒载量。
Thorax. 2021 Jan;76(1):61-63. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2020-215042. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
5
Saliva for use with a point of care assay for the rapid diagnosis of COVID-19.用于即时检测以快速诊断新型冠状病毒肺炎的唾液。
Clin Chim Acta. 2020 Nov;510:685-686. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2020.09.001. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
6
Testing for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Coronavirus 2: Challenges in Getting Good Specimens, Choosing the Right Test, and Interpreting the Results.检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2:获取良好标本、选择正确检测方法和解读结果的挑战。
Crit Care Med. 2020 Nov;48(11):1680-1689. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004594.
7
How many are we missing with ID NOW COVID-19 assay using direct nasopharyngeal swabs? Findings from a mid-sized academic hospital clinical microbiology laboratory.使用直接鼻咽拭子的 ID NOW COVID-19 检测我们漏检了多少人?来自一家中型学术医院临床微生物学实验室的发现。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020 Oct;98(2):115123. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2020.115123. Epub 2020 Jul 4.
8
Direct Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 Analytical Limits of Detection across Seven Molecular Assays.七种分子检测方法对 SARS-CoV-2 分析检测限的直接比较
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Aug 24;58(9). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01535-20.
9
Commercial Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Molecular Assays: Superior Analytical Sensitivity of cobas SARS-CoV-2 Relative to NxTAG CoV Extended Panel and ID NOW COVID-19 Test.商业用严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)分子检测:与 NxTAG CoV 扩展面板和 ID NOW COVID-19 测试相比, cobas SARS-CoV-2 的分析灵敏度更高。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2020 Nov 1;144(11):1303-1310. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2020-0283-SA.
10
Pathophysiology, Transmission, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Review.新型冠状病毒病 2019(COVID-19)的病理生理学、传播、诊断和治疗:综述。
JAMA. 2020 Aug 25;324(8):782-793. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.12839.