Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Alzheimer Center Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Neuropsychol Rev. 2022 Jun;32(2):294-315. doi: 10.1007/s11065-021-09507-2. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
Feedback of neuropsychological test results to patients and family members include psychoeducation and implications for daily life. This scoping review aimed to provide an overview of the literature on neuropsychological feedback and to offer clinical recommendations. In accordance with formal scoping review methodology, PubMed, PsycInfo, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Embase databases were searched. Studies were included if they reported on neuropsychological feedback, if full papers were available, and if they included human participants. All languages were included, and no limit was placed on the year of publication. Of the 2,173 records screened, 34 publications met the inclusion criteria. Five additional publications were included after cross-referencing. An update of the search led to the inclusion of two additional papers. Of these 41 publications, 26 were research papers. Neuropsychological feedback is provided for a wide spectrum of diagnoses and usually given in-person and has been related to optimal a positive effect on patient outcomes (e.g. increase the quality of life). Most papers reported on satisfaction and found that satisfaction with an NPA increased when useful feedback was provided. However, information retention was found to be low, but communication aids, such as written information, were found to be helpful in improving retention. The current review demonstrated the benefits of neuropsychological feedback and that this should be part of standard clinical procedures when conducting a neuropsychological assessment. Further research on the benefits of neuropsychological feedback and how to improve information provision would enrich the neuropsychological literature.
向患者和家属反馈神经心理学测试结果包括心理教育和对日常生活的影响。本范围综述旨在提供神经心理学反馈文献的概述，并提供临床建议。根据正式的范围综述方法，检索了 PubMed、PsycInfo、Web of Science、CINAHL 和 Embase 数据库。如果报告了神经心理学反馈，如果有完整的论文并且包括人类参与者，则纳入研究。包括所有语言，对发表年份没有限制。在筛选的 2173 条记录中，有 34 篇符合纳入标准。在交叉引用后又纳入了 5 篇额外的出版物。更新搜索后纳入了另外 2 篇论文。在这 41 篇出版物中，有 26 篇是研究论文。神经心理学反馈针对广泛的诊断，通常是面对面提供的，并且与患者结果的最佳积极影响相关（例如提高生活质量）。大多数论文报告了满意度，并发现提供有用的反馈时，对 NPA 的满意度会增加。然而，发现信息保留率较低，但信息辅助工具，如书面信息，有助于提高保留率。本综述表明了神经心理学反馈的益处，并且在进行神经心理学评估时，这应该成为标准临床程序的一部分。关于神经心理学反馈的益处以及如何改进信息提供的进一步研究将丰富神经心理学文献。
