Mahoney Martin Christopher, Park Eunhee, Schlienz Nicolas J, Duerr CeCe, Hawk Larry W
Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, United States.
School of Nursing, University of Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States.
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Apr 30;5(4):e25541. doi: 10.2196/25541.
The pandemic of SARS-CoV-2, which causes COVID-19, has caused disruptions in ongoing clinical trials and is expected to accelerate interest in conducting research studies remotely.
A quasi-experimental, mixed methods approach was used to examine the rates of visit completion as well as the opinions and experiences of participants enrolled in an ongoing clinical trial of smoking cessation who were required to change from in-person clinic visits to remote visits using video or telephone conferencing due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
For quantitative comparisons, we used a quasi-experimental design, comparing a cohort of participants followed during the pandemic (n=23, COVID-19 cohort) to a comparable cohort of participants followed over a similar time period in the calendar years 2018 and 2019 (n=51, pre-COVID-19 cohort) to examine the rates of completion of scheduled visits and biospecimen collection. For the qualitative component, interviews were conducted with participants who experienced the transition from in-person to remote visits.
Participants in the COVID-19 cohort completed an average of 83.6% of remote clinic visits (95% CI 73.1%-91.2%), which was not significantly different than the in-person completion rate of 89.8% in the pre-COVID-19 cohort. Participants in the COVID-19 cohort returned an average of 93.2% (95% CI 83.5%-98.1%) of saliva specimens for remote clinic visits completed, which was not significantly different than the in-person saliva specimen completion rate of 100% in the pre-COVID-19 cohort. Two broad themes emerged from the qualitative data: (1) the benefits of remote visits and (2) the challenges of remote counseling compared to in-person counseling. Despite limited experience with telehealth prior to this transition, most participants expressed a willingness to engage in remote visits in the future.
Even in the context of a rapid transition from in-person to remote visits necessitated by the COVID-19 pandemic, rates of visit completion and return of biospecimens remained high. Participants were generally accepting of the transition. Further research is needed to identify the optimal mix of in-person and remote visits beyond the pandemic context and to better understand how these changes may impact study outcomes.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03262662; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT03262662.
导致新冠肺炎的严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)大流行扰乱了正在进行的临床试验,并预计会加速对远程开展研究的兴趣。
采用一种准实验性的混合方法,来检查访视完成率,以及参与一项正在进行的戒烟临床试验的参与者的意见和体验。这些参与者因新冠肺炎大流行而需要从亲自到诊所就诊改为使用视频或电话会议进行远程就诊。
为了进行定量比较,我们采用了准实验设计,将大流行期间随访的一组参与者(n = 23,新冠肺炎队列)与2018年和2019年日历年度中在类似时间段内随访的一组可比参与者(n = 51,新冠肺炎前队列)进行比较,以检查预定访视和生物样本采集的完成率。对于定性部分,对经历了从亲自就诊到远程就诊转变的参与者进行了访谈。
新冠肺炎队列中的参与者平均完成了83.6%的远程诊所访视(95%置信区间73.1% - 91.2%),这与新冠肺炎前队列中89.8%的亲自就诊完成率没有显著差异。新冠肺炎队列中的参与者在完成的远程诊所访视中平均返还了93.2%(95%置信区间83.5% - 98.1%)的唾液样本,这与新冠肺炎前队列中100%的亲自唾液样本完成率没有显著差异。定性数据中出现了两个广泛的主题:(1)远程访视的益处和(2)与亲自咨询相比远程咨询的挑战。尽管在这次转变之前对远程医疗的经验有限,但大多数参与者表示愿意在未来参与远程访视。
即使在新冠肺炎大流行导致从亲自就诊迅速转变为远程就诊的情况下,访视完成率和生物样本返还率仍然很高。参与者普遍接受这种转变。需要进一步研究以确定在大流行背景之外亲自就诊和远程就诊的最佳组合,并更好地理解这些变化可能如何影响研究结果。
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03262662;https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT03262662 。