• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Using Computational Modeling to Capture Schizophrenia-Specific Reinforcement Learning Differences and Their Implications on Patient Classification.使用计算建模捕捉精神分裂症特异性强化学习差异及其对患者分类的影响。
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2022 Oct;7(10):1035-1046. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2021.03.017. Epub 2021 Apr 18.
2
Predicting psychosis across diagnostic boundaries: Behavioral and computational modeling evidence for impaired reinforcement learning in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder with a history of psychosis.跨越诊断界限预测精神病:精神分裂症和有精神病病史的双相情感障碍中强化学习受损的行为和计算建模证据。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2015 Aug;124(3):697-708. doi: 10.1037/abn0000039.
3
Interactions Among Working Memory, Reinforcement Learning, and Effort in Value-Based Choice: A New Paradigm and Selective Deficits in Schizophrenia.基于价值的选择中工作记忆、强化学习和努力之间的相互作用:一种新范式及精神分裂症中的选择性缺陷。
Biol Psychiatry. 2017 Sep 15;82(6):431-439. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.05.017. Epub 2017 May 31.
4
Mild Reinforcement Learning Deficits in Patients With First-Episode Psychosis.首发精神病患者的轻度强化学习缺陷
Schizophr Bull. 2016 Nov;42(6):1476-1485. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbw060. Epub 2016 May 13.
5
Disease and drug effects on internally-generated and externally-elicited responses in first episode schizophrenia and psychotic bipolar disorder.疾病和药物对首发精神分裂症和双相情感障碍精神病性发作中内源性和外源性诱发反应的影响。
Schizophr Res. 2014 Oct;159(1):101-6. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2014.07.028. Epub 2014 Aug 8.
6
Reinforcement learning abnormalities in the attenuated psychosis syndrome and first episode psychosis.在精神病前期综合征和首发精神病中强化学习异常。
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2021 Jun;47:11-19. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2021.03.014. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
7
Both unmedicated and medicated individuals with schizophrenia show impairments across a wide array of cognitive and reinforcement learning tasks.未服药和服药的精神分裂症患者在广泛的认知和强化学习任务中都表现出损伤。
Psychol Med. 2022 Apr;52(6):1115-1125. doi: 10.1017/S003329172000286X. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
8
Impaired Expected Value Computations Coupled With Overreliance on Stimulus-Response Learning in Schizophrenia.精神分裂症患者的预期价值计算受损,同时过度依赖刺激-反应学习。
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2018 Nov;3(11):916-926. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2018.03.014. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
9
Deficits in positive reinforcement learning and uncertainty-driven exploration are associated with distinct aspects of negative symptoms in schizophrenia.正强化学习和不确定性驱动的探索能力缺陷与精神分裂症阴性症状的不同方面相关。
Biol Psychiatry. 2011 Mar 1;69(5):424-31. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.10.015. Epub 2010 Dec 17.
10
Differential neural reward mechanisms in treatment-responsive and treatment-resistant schizophrenia.治疗反应性和治疗抵抗性精神分裂症的神经奖赏机制差异。
Psychol Med. 2018 Oct;48(14):2418-2427. doi: 10.1017/S0033291718000041. Epub 2018 Feb 14.

引用本文的文献

1
How working memory and reinforcement learning interact when avoiding punishment and pursuing reward concurrently.当同时避免惩罚和追求奖励时,工作记忆与强化学习是如何相互作用的。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2025 Sep 1. doi: 10.1037/xge0001817.
2
16p11.2 duplication shows early male-biased impacts on reward learning, but NMDA receptor antagonism reduces optimal choice selection in both wildtypes and 16p11.2 duplication.16p11.2重复显示出对奖励学习的早期雄性偏向性影响,但NMDA受体拮抗作用会降低野生型和16p11.2重复个体的最优选择。
bioRxiv. 2025 Jun 29:2025.06.28.662127. doi: 10.1101/2025.06.28.662127.
3
Beyond reward learning deficits: Exploration-exploitation instability reveals computational heterogeneity in value-based decision making in early psychosis.超越奖赏学习缺陷:探索-利用不稳定性揭示了早期精神病基于价值决策中的计算异质性。
medRxiv. 2025 May 1:2025.04.29.25326698. doi: 10.1101/2025.04.29.25326698.
4
Developing algorithmic psychiatry via multi-level spanning computational models.通过多层次跨尺度计算模型发展算法精神病学。
Cell Rep Med. 2025 May 20;6(5):102094. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2025.102094. Epub 2025 Apr 28.
5
Evidence for shallow cognitive maps in Schizophrenia.精神分裂症中浅层认知地图的证据。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2025 Mar 20. doi: 10.3758/s13415-025-01283-3.
6
A prefrontal thalamocortical readout for conflict-related executive dysfunction in schizophrenia.精神分裂症中与冲突相关的执行功能障碍的前额叶丘脑皮质读出。
Cell Rep Med. 2024 Nov 19;5(11):101802. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2024.101802. Epub 2024 Nov 7.
7
The neuroscience of mental illness: Building toward the future.精神疾病的神经科学:面向未来的发展。
Cell. 2024 Oct 17;187(21):5858-5870. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2024.09.028.
8
Understanding Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Psychosis Through the Predictive Coding Framework.通过预测编码框架理解针对精神病的认知行为疗法。
Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci. 2024 May 13;4(4):100333. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsgos.2024.100333. eCollection 2024 Jul.
9
The challenge of learning adaptive mental behavior.学习自适应心理行为的挑战。
J Psychopathol Clin Sci. 2024 Jul;133(5):413-426. doi: 10.1037/abn0000924. Epub 2024 May 30.
10
Interpersonal coordination in schizophrenia: a concise update on paradigms, computations, and neuroimaging findings.精神分裂症中的人际协调:关于范式、计算和神经影像学发现的简要更新
Psychoradiology. 2023 Feb 7;3:kkad002. doi: 10.1093/psyrad/kkad002. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Uncertainty and Exploration.不确定性与探索。
Decision (Wash D C ). 2019 Jul;6(3):277-286. doi: 10.1037/dec0000101. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
2
Ten simple rules for the computational modeling of behavioral data.计算行为数据建模的 10 个简单规则。
Elife. 2019 Nov 26;8:e49547. doi: 10.7554/eLife.49547.
3
Impaired Expected Value Computations Coupled With Overreliance on Stimulus-Response Learning in Schizophrenia.精神分裂症患者的预期价值计算受损,同时过度依赖刺激-反应学习。
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2018 Nov;3(11):916-926. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2018.03.014. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
4
Motivational Deficits in Schizophrenia Are Associated With Reduced Differentiation Between Gain and Loss-Avoidance Feedback in the Striatum.精神分裂症的动机缺陷与纹状体中收益和损失回避反馈之间的分化减少有关。
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2018 Mar;3(3):239-247. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2017.07.008. Epub 2017 Aug 12.
5
The effect of atomoxetine on random and directed exploration in humans.托莫西汀对人类随机和定向探索的影响。
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 26;12(4):e0176034. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176034. eCollection 2017.
6
Probabilistic Reinforcement Learning in Patients With Schizophrenia: Relationships to Anhedonia and Avolition.精神分裂症患者的概率强化学习:与快感缺乏和意志缺失的关系。
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2016 Sep;1(5):460-473. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2016.05.005.
7
The effects of aging on the interaction between reinforcement learning and attention.衰老对强化学习与注意力之间相互作用的影响。
Psychol Aging. 2016 Nov;31(7):747-757. doi: 10.1037/pag0000112. Epub 2016 Sep 5.
8
Taming the beast: extracting generalizable knowledge from computational models of cognition.驯服这头野兽:从认知计算模型中提取可推广的知识。
Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2016 Oct;11:49-54. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.04.003.
9
Computational psychiatry as a bridge from neuroscience to clinical applications.计算精神病学作为从神经科学通向临床应用的桥梁。
Nat Neurosci. 2016 Mar;19(3):404-13. doi: 10.1038/nn.4238.
10
Probabilistic Reversal Learning in Schizophrenia: Stability of Deficits and Potential Causal Mechanisms.精神分裂症中的概率性反转学习:缺陷的稳定性及潜在因果机制
Schizophr Bull. 2016 Jul;42(4):942-51. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbv226. Epub 2016 Feb 16.

使用计算建模捕捉精神分裂症特异性强化学习差异及其对患者分类的影响。

Using Computational Modeling to Capture Schizophrenia-Specific Reinforcement Learning Differences and Their Implications on Patient Classification.

机构信息

Department of Department of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.

Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri; Department of Radiology, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri; Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.

出版信息

Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2022 Oct;7(10):1035-1046. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2021.03.017. Epub 2021 Apr 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.bpsc.2021.03.017
PMID:33878489
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9272137/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Psychiatric diagnosis and treatment have historically taken a symptom-based approach, with less attention on identifying underlying symptom-producing mechanisms. Recent efforts have illuminated the extent to which different underlying circuitry can produce phenotypically similar symptomatology (e.g., psychosis in bipolar disorder vs. schizophrenia). Computational modeling makes it possible to identify and mathematically differentiate behaviorally unobservable, specific reinforcement learning differences in patients with schizophrenia versus other disorders, likely owing to a higher reliance on prediction error-driven learning associated with basal ganglia and underreliance on explicit value representations associated with orbitofrontal cortex.

METHODS

We used a well-established probabilistic reinforcement learning task to replicate those findings in individuals with schizophrenia both on (n = 120) and off (n = 44) antipsychotic medications and included a patient comparison group of bipolar patients with psychosis (n = 60) and healthy control subjects (n = 72).

RESULTS

Using accuracy, there was a main effect of group (F = 7.87, p < .001), such that all patient groups were less accurate than control subjects. Using computationally derived parameters, both medicated and unmediated individuals with schizophrenia, but not patients with bipolar disorder, demonstrated a reduced mixing parameter (F = 13.91, p < .001), indicating less dependence on learning explicit value representations as well as greater learning decay between training and test (F = 12.81, p < .001). Unmedicated patients with schizophrenia also showed greater decision noise (F = 2.67, p = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

Both medicated and unmedicated patients showed overreliance on prediction error-driven learning as well as significantly higher noise and value-related memory decay, compared with the healthy control subjects and the patients with bipolar disorder. Additionally, the computational model parameters capturing these processes can significantly improve patient/control classification, potentially providing useful diagnosis insight.

摘要

背景

精神科诊断和治疗历来采用基于症状的方法,较少关注识别潜在的症状产生机制。最近的研究表明,不同的潜在电路可以产生表型相似的症状(例如,双相情感障碍与精神分裂症中的精神病)。计算建模使得有可能识别和数学区分精神分裂症患者与其他疾病患者的行为上不可观察的、特定的强化学习差异,这可能是由于与基底神经节相关的更高的依赖于预测误差驱动的学习以及对与眶额皮层相关的明确价值表示的依赖不足。

方法

我们使用一种成熟的概率强化学习任务,在服用(n=120)和未服用(n=44)抗精神病药物的精神分裂症患者中复制这些发现,并包括一组有精神病的双相情感障碍患者(n=60)和健康对照组(n=72)作为患者比较组。

结果

使用准确性,存在组间的主要效应(F=7.87,p<.001),即所有患者组的准确性均低于对照组。使用计算得出的参数,服用药物和未服用药物的精神分裂症患者均表现出混合参数降低(F=13.91,p<.001),表明对学习明确价值表示的依赖性降低,以及在训练和测试之间的学习衰减更大(F=12.81,p<.001)。未服用药物的精神分裂症患者还表现出更大的决策噪声(F=2.67,p=.04)。

结论

与健康对照组和双相情感障碍患者相比,服用药物和未服用药物的患者均表现出对预测误差驱动学习的过度依赖,以及明显更高的噪声和与价值相关的记忆衰减。此外,捕获这些过程的计算模型参数可以显著改善患者/对照分类,为提供有用的诊断见解提供了可能性。