Stagg Brendan, Simpson Anna, Sidhu Shireen
SA Health, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
Clinpath Pathology, Mile End, South Australia, Australia.
BMJ Case Rep. 2021 Apr 20;14(4):e242162. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2021-242162.
A 51-year-old woman presented with a 4-month history of painful ulcers in the mouth and vulva, and painful vegetative plaques at intertriginous sites. Skin biopsies showed squamous hyperplasia and intraepidermal eosinophilic pustulation. Skin direct immunofluorescence (DIF) revealed intercellular deposition of IgG and C3 in the lower part of the epidermis, while serum indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) confirmed the presence of antiepithelial antibodies. The patient was diagnosed with pemphigus vegetans, and successfully treated with dapsone, prednisolone and topical steroids. Although pemphigus vegetans and pyostomatitis-pyodermatitis vegetans can show identical clinical and histological features, the presence or absence of comorbid inflammatory bowel disease, and the results of both skin DIF and serum IIF can be used to distinguish between these two conditions. This case report explores the challenges in making this distinction, and the implications of establishing the correct diagnosis.
一名51岁女性,口腔和外阴出现疼痛性溃疡4个月,间擦部位有疼痛性增殖性斑块。皮肤活检显示鳞状上皮增生和表皮内嗜酸性脓疱形成。皮肤直接免疫荧光(DIF)显示表皮下部IgG和C3的细胞间沉积,而血清间接免疫荧光(IIF)证实存在抗上皮抗体。该患者被诊断为增殖性天疱疮,使用氨苯砜、泼尼松龙和外用类固醇成功治疗。虽然增殖性天疱疮和增殖性脓性口炎-脓性皮炎可表现出相同的临床和组织学特征,但合并炎症性肠病的有无以及皮肤DIF和血清IIF的结果可用于区分这两种情况。本病例报告探讨了进行这种区分时面临的挑战以及正确诊断的意义。