From the Burn Treatment Center, Dr. José Frota Institute; and the Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Drug Research and Development Center, Federal University of Ceará.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 May 1;147(5):1189-1198. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000007895.
In a phase II study comparing Nile tilapia fish skin to silver sulfadiazine cream for outpatient management of superficial partial-thickness burns, the fish skin decreased reepithelialization time (average reduction, 1.43 days), dressing changes (average reduction, 3.72 dressings), and visual analogue scale pain scores. The present study aimed to further evaluate Nile tilapia fish skin efficacy for superficial partial-thickness burns. Unlike silver sulfadiazine cream, the fish skin has good adherence to the wound bed, which may prevent infections and decrease need for dressing changes. Thus, it could be a low-cost alternative to hasten healing and improve pain of burn patients.
A phase III randomized controlled trial was conducted from April of 2017 to October of 2018 in Fortaleza, Brazil, and included 115 outpatients aged 18 to 70 years with superficial partial-thickness burns affecting 15 percent or less of body surface area and no previous treatment. Fifty-seven patients were treated with the glycerolized fish skin and 58 with silver sulfadiazine cream 1%. Primary outcomes were reepithelialization time, number of dressings, treatment-related costs, and pain intensity, assessed by means of visual analogue scale, Electronic von Frey, Burns Specific Pain Anxiety Scale, and analgesic use. Patients were evaluated every 48 hours.
Patients treated with fish skin required fewer days for reepithelialization (9.7 ± 0.6 days versus 10.2 ± 0.9 days; p = 0.001) and fewer dressings (1.6 ± 0.7 versus 4.9 ± 0.5; p < 0.001). They also had decreased analgesic needs and visual analogue scale, Burns Specific Pain Anxiety Scale, and Electronic von Frey measurements. Finally, fish skin use reduced the final average treatment-related cost per patient by 42.1 percent.
By hastening reepithelialization, improving burn-related pain, and decreasing treatment-related costs, Nile tilapia fish skin could benefit the resource-poor public health systems of developing countries.
CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, II.
在一项比较尼罗罗非鱼鱼皮和磺胺嘧啶银乳膏用于门诊治疗浅Ⅱ度烧伤的Ⅱ期研究中,鱼皮可减少上皮化时间(平均减少 1.43 天)、换药次数(平均减少 3.72 次)和视觉模拟评分疼痛。本研究旨在进一步评估尼罗罗非鱼鱼皮治疗浅Ⅱ度烧伤的疗效。与磺胺嘧啶银乳膏不同,鱼皮对创面的黏附性良好,可预防感染,减少换药次数。因此,它可能是一种低成本的替代方法,可加速愈合并改善烧伤患者的疼痛。
2017 年 4 月至 2018 年 10 月,在巴西福塔莱萨进行了一项Ⅲ期随机对照试验,纳入 115 例年龄在 18 至 70 岁之间的浅Ⅱ度烧伤患者,烧伤面积占体表面积的 15%或以下,且未接受过治疗。57 例患者接受甘油化鱼皮治疗,58 例患者接受 1%磺胺嘧啶银乳膏治疗。主要结局为上皮化时间、换药次数、治疗相关费用和疼痛强度,采用视觉模拟评分法、电子 von Frey 法、烧伤特异性疼痛焦虑量表和镇痛药使用情况进行评估。患者每 48 小时评估一次。
鱼皮治疗组上皮化时间(9.7 ± 0.6 天比 10.2 ± 0.9 天;p = 0.001)和换药次数(1.6 ± 0.7 次比 4.9 ± 0.5 次;p < 0.001)均较少。患者的镇痛需求以及视觉模拟评分、烧伤特异性疼痛焦虑量表和电子 von Frey 测量值均降低。最后,鱼皮的使用使每位患者的平均治疗相关费用降低了 42.1%。
通过加速上皮化、改善烧伤相关疼痛和降低治疗相关费用,尼罗罗非鱼鱼皮可能有益于资源匮乏的发展中国家公共卫生系统。
临床问题/证据水平:治疗性,Ⅱ级。