Suppr超能文献

美国肩肘外科医生标准化肩部评估表问卷中文版:患者自我报告部分——一项跨文化调适与验证研究

The Chinese version of the American shoulder and elbow surgeons standardized shoulder assessment form questionnaire, patient self-report section: a cross-cultural adaptation and validation study.

作者信息

Tie Tung-Hee Albert, Hong Chih-Kai, Chua Illich, Kuan Fa-Chuan, Su Wei-Ren, Hsu Kai-Lan

机构信息

National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, No.138, Sheng-Li Road, North Dist., Tainan City, 70428, Taiwan.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, No.138, Sheng-Li Road, North Dist., Tainan City, 70428, Taiwan.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Apr 24;22(1):382. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04255-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The patient self-report section of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASESp) is one of the most validated and reliable assessment tools. This study aimed to establish a validated Chinese version of ASESp (ASESp-CH).

METHODS

A clinical prospective study was performed (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04755049; registered on 2021/02/11). Following the guidelines of forward-backward translation and cross-cultural adaptation, a Chinese version of ASESp was established. Patients older than 18 years with shoulder disorders were included. Patients who could not complete test-retest questionnaires within the interval of 7-30 days and patients who received interventions were excluded. Intraclass correlation (ICC) was calculated for test- retest reliability, whereas internal consistency was determined by Cronbach value. Construct validity was evaluated by comparing the corresponding domains between the ASESp-CH and a validated Chinese version of 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36).

RESULTS

A total of 86 patients were included with a mean test-retest interval of 12 ± 5.4 days. Test-retest reliability was excellent with an ICC of 0.94. Good internal consistency was found, with a Cronbach alpha of 0.86. Construct validity of the ASESp-CH questionnaire was good. The major domains of the ASESp-CH were significantly correlated with the respective domains in the SF-36 (p <  0.01), except for the domain of stability of ASESp-CH.

CONCLUSIONS

The Chinese version of ASESp questionnaire is a highly validated and reliable tool for shoulder disorder assessment.

摘要

背景

美国肩肘外科医师协会标准化肩部评估表(ASESp)中的患者自我报告部分是经过最充分验证且最可靠的评估工具之一。本研究旨在建立一份经过验证的ASESp中文版(ASESp-CH)。

方法

进行了一项临床前瞻性研究(ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT04755049;于2021年2月11日注册)。遵循前后翻译和跨文化适应的指南,建立了ASESp的中文版。纳入年龄大于18岁的肩部疾病患者。排除在7至30天间隔内无法完成重测问卷的患者以及接受过干预的患者。计算组内相关系数(ICC)以评估重测信度,而内部一致性则通过克朗巴哈值来确定。通过比较ASESp-CH与经过验证的中文版36项简短健康调查(SF-36)的相应领域来评估结构效度。

结果

共纳入86例患者,平均重测间隔为12±5.4天。重测信度极佳,ICC为0.94。发现内部一致性良好,克朗巴哈α系数为0.86。ASESp-CH问卷的结构效度良好。ASESp-CH的主要领域与SF-36中的相应领域显著相关(p<0.01),ASESp-CH的稳定性领域除外。

结论

ASESp问卷中文版是用于肩部疾病评估的经过高度验证且可靠的工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ac2/8070278/e24befbbdd72/12891_2021_4255_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验