Odum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Center for the Ecology of Infectious Diseases, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Proc Biol Sci. 2021 Apr 28;288(1949):20203074. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.3074.
Initial efforts to mitigate transmission of SARS-CoV-2 relied on intensive social distancing measures such as school and workplace closures, shelter-in-place orders and prohibitions on the gathering of people. Other non-pharmaceutical interventions for suppressing transmission include active case finding, contact tracing, quarantine, immunity or health certification, and a wide range of personal protective measures. Here we investigate the potential effectiveness of these alternative approaches to suppression. We introduce a conceptual framework represented by two mathematical models that differ in strategy. We find both strategies may be effective, although both require extensive testing and work within a relatively narrow range of conditions. Generalized protective measures such as wearing face masks, improved hygiene and local reductions in density are found to significantly increase the effectiveness of targeted interventions.
最初,为了减少 SARS-CoV-2 的传播,人们采取了密集的社会隔离措施,如关闭学校和工作场所、就地避难所命令和禁止人群聚集。其他抑制传播的非药物干预措施包括主动发现病例、接触者追踪、隔离、免疫或健康认证以及广泛的个人防护措施。在这里,我们研究了这些替代抑制方法的潜在效果。我们引入了一个由两个数学模型表示的概念框架,这两个模型在策略上有所不同。我们发现这两种策略都可能有效,尽管它们都需要广泛的测试,并且在相对狭窄的条件范围内工作。发现佩戴口罩、改善卫生和局部降低密度等一般性保护措施可显著提高针对性干预措施的效果。