• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用动机识别游戏机制,对有效的游戏化设计流程进行定性评估。

Qualitative Assessment of Effective Gamification Design Processes Using Motivators to Identify Game Mechanics.

机构信息

Group of Research on Technology Enhanced Learning (GRETEL), Universitat Ramon Llull, La Salle, 08022 Barcelona, Spain.

Communities and Children Faculty, University of St. Mark and St. John, Plymouth PL6 8BH, UK.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2021 Apr 6;21(7):2556. doi: 10.3390/s21072556.

DOI:10.3390/s21072556
PMID:33917409
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8038701/
Abstract

This research focuses on the study and qualitative assessment of the relationships between motivators and game mechanics per the ratings of expert gamification consultants. By taking this approach, it is intended that during the design phase of a gamified system, decisions can be made about the design of the system based on the motivators of each of the profiles. These motivators can be determined from the information provided by the potential players themselves. The research presented starts from a previous analysis in which, based on the three most used gamification frameworks and through a card sorting technique that allows the user to organize and classify the content, a set of mechanics are determined. In the present study, each of the mechanics is analyzed, and a more precise motive is decided. As a result, a higher level of personalization is achieved and, consequently, approximates a higher level of gamification effectiveness. The main conclusions are implemented in the development of the Game4City 3.0 project, which addresses gamified and interactive strategies to visualize urban environments in 3D at an educational and social level.

摘要

本研究专注于研究和定性评估激励因素与游戏机制之间的关系,这是根据专家游戏化顾问的评级得出的。通过采用这种方法,旨在在游戏化系统的设计阶段,可以根据每个用户画像的激励因素来做出关于系统设计的决策。这些激励因素可以从潜在玩家自己提供的信息中确定。本研究从之前的分析开始,该分析基于三个最常用的游戏化框架,并通过一种卡片分类技术,使用户可以组织和分类内容,确定了一组机制。在本研究中,分析了每个机制,并决定了更精确的动机。结果,实现了更高水平的个性化,从而更接近更高水平的游戏化效果。主要结论在 Game4City 3.0 项目的开发中得到了实施,该项目针对的是游戏化和互动策略,用于在教育和社会层面上以 3D 形式可视化城市环境。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb69/8038701/86080fa08a5c/sensors-21-02556-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb69/8038701/1d2fe244ea5e/sensors-21-02556-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb69/8038701/8886ac0193df/sensors-21-02556-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb69/8038701/86080fa08a5c/sensors-21-02556-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb69/8038701/1d2fe244ea5e/sensors-21-02556-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb69/8038701/8886ac0193df/sensors-21-02556-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb69/8038701/86080fa08a5c/sensors-21-02556-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Qualitative Assessment of Effective Gamification Design Processes Using Motivators to Identify Game Mechanics.使用动机识别游戏机制,对有效的游戏化设计流程进行定性评估。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Apr 6;21(7):2556. doi: 10.3390/s21072556.
2
A Gamification Framework for Cognitive Assessment and Cognitive Training: Qualitative Study.用于认知评估和认知训练的游戏化框架:定性研究
JMIR Serious Games. 2021 May 18;9(2):e21900. doi: 10.2196/21900.
3
Playing alone: can game design elements satisfy user needs in gamified mHealth services?独自游戏:游戏设计元素能否满足游戏化移动健康服务中的用户需求?
Health Promot Int. 2022 Apr 29;37(2). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daab168.
4
Leaderboard Design Principles to Enhance Learning and Motivation in a Gamified Educational Environment: Development Study.提升游戏化教育环境中学习与动机的排行榜设计原则:发展性研究
JMIR Serious Games. 2021 Apr 20;9(2):e14746. doi: 10.2196/14746.
5
Effects of a Personalized Fitness Recommender System Using Gamification and Continuous Player Modeling: System Design and Long-Term Validation Study.使用游戏化和持续玩家建模的个性化健身推荐系统的效果:系统设计与长期验证研究
JMIR Serious Games. 2020 Nov 17;8(4):e19968. doi: 10.2196/19968.
6
Engaging Elderly People in Telemedicine Through Gamification.通过游戏化让老年人参与远程医疗。
JMIR Serious Games. 2015 Dec 18;3(2):e9. doi: 10.2196/games.4561.
7
Learning Landscape in Gamification: The Need for a Methodological Protocol in Research Applications.游戏化中的学习情境:研究应用中对方法学协议的需求。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2025 May;20(3):460-484. doi: 10.1177/17456916231202489. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
8
Gamified Cognitive Bias Modification Interventions for Psychiatric Disorders: Review.用于精神疾病的游戏化认知偏差修正干预措施:综述
JMIR Ment Health. 2018 Oct 25;5(4):e11640. doi: 10.2196/11640.
9
A game plan: Gamification design principles in mHealth applications for chronic disease management.一个游戏计划:用于慢性病管理的移动健康应用程序中的游戏化设计原则。
Health Informatics J. 2016 Jun;22(2):184-93. doi: 10.1177/1460458214537511. Epub 2014 Jul 1.
10
Energy gamification: design and development of a user interface tool to upgrade social experience and energy literacy.能源游戏化:用于提升社交体验和能源素养的用户界面工具的设计与开发
Open Res Eur. 2023 Aug 17;2:130. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.15158.2. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Qualitative assessment of a challenge-based learning and teamwork applied in electronics program.基于挑战的学习与团队合作在电子课程中的应用的定性评估
Heliyon. 2023 Nov 23;9(12):e22739. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22739. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Effectiveness of embodied evaluation of mobile applications: A qualitative study.移动应用程序的具身评估有效性:一项定性研究。
Heliyon. 2023 Jun 8;9(6):e17043. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17043. eCollection 2023 Jun.
3
Identification and comparison of the main variables affecting early university dropout rates according to knowledge area and institution.

本文引用的文献

1
Suitability and Comparison of Questionnaires Assessing Virtual Reality-Induced Symptoms and Effects and User Experience in Virtual Environments.评估虚拟现实诱发症状和效应及用户在虚拟环境中体验的问卷的适用性和比较。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Feb 8;21(4):1185. doi: 10.3390/s21041185.
2
Playability and Player Experience in Digital Games for Elderly: A Systematic Literature Review.数字游戏对老年人的可玩性和玩家体验:系统文献回顾。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Jul 16;20(14):3958. doi: 10.3390/s20143958.
3
The Impact of Technology on People with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Literature Review.
根据知识领域和机构,识别并比较影响大学早期辍学率的主要变量。
Heliyon. 2023 Jun 17;9(6):e17435. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17435. eCollection 2023 Jun.
4
Gender and Age Differences in Preferences on Game Elements and Platforms.性别和年龄差异对游戏元素和平台的偏好。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 May 7;22(9):3567. doi: 10.3390/s22093567.
5
Gamification and Hazard Communication in Virtual Reality: A Qualitative Study.游戏化与虚拟现实中的危险沟通:一项定性研究。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jul 7;21(14):4663. doi: 10.3390/s21144663.
技术对自闭症谱系障碍患者的影响:系统文献综述。
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Oct 16;19(20):4485. doi: 10.3390/s19204485.
4
Evaluation of the Create@School Game-Based Learning-Teaching Approach.基于学校创建游戏的学习-教学方法评估。
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Jul 24;19(15):3251. doi: 10.3390/s19153251.
5
What is Qualitative in Qualitative Research.定性研究中的“定性”是什么。
Qual Sociol. 2019;42(2):139-160. doi: 10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
6
Characterising and justifying sample size sufficiency in interview-based studies: systematic analysis of qualitative health research over a 15-year period.基于访谈的研究中样本量充足性的特征描述和论证:对 15 年来定性健康研究的系统分析。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 21;18(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0594-7.
7
Validity, reliability, and generalizability in qualitative research.定性研究中的效度、信度和可推广性。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2015 Jul-Sep;4(3):324-7. doi: 10.4103/2249-4863.161306.
8
Motivations for play in online games.网络游戏中的游戏动机。
Cyberpsychol Behav. 2006 Dec;9(6):772-5. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2006.9.772.
9
Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being.自我决定理论与内在动机、社会发展和幸福感的促进
Am Psychol. 2000 Jan;55(1):68-78. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68.