STADIUS Center for Dynamical Systems, Signal Processing and Data Analytics, Department of Electrical Engineering (ESAT), KU Leuven, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.
Imec, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Apr 8;21(8):2613. doi: 10.3390/s21082613.
Impedance pneumography has been suggested as an ambulatory technique for the monitoring of respiratory diseases. However, its ambulatory nature makes the recordings more prone to noise sources. It is important that such noisy segments are identified and removed, since they could have a huge impact on the performance of data-driven decision support tools. In this study, we investigated the added value of machine learning algorithms to separate clean from noisy bio-impedance signals. We compared three approaches: a heuristic algorithm, a feature-based classification model (SVM) and a convolutional neural network (CNN). The dataset consists of 47 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients who performed an inspiratory threshold loading protocol. During this protocol, their respiration was recorded with a bio-impedance device and a spirometer, which served as a gold standard. Four annotators scored the signals for the presence of artefacts, based on the reference signal. We have shown that the accuracy of both machine learning approaches (SVM: 87.77 ± 2.64% and CNN: 87.20 ± 2.78%) is significantly higher, compared to the heuristic approach (84.69 ± 2.32%). Moreover, no significant differences could be observed between the two machine learning approaches. The feature-based and neural network model obtained a respective AUC of 92.77±2.95% and 92.51±1.74%. These findings show that a data-driven approach could be beneficial for the task of artefact detection in respiratory thoracic bio-impedance signals.
阻抗式呼吸描记法已被提议作为一种监测呼吸疾病的非卧床技术。然而,其非卧床性质使得记录更容易受到噪声源的影响。重要的是识别和去除这些嘈杂的片段,因为它们可能对数据驱动的决策支持工具的性能产生巨大影响。在这项研究中,我们研究了机器学习算法在分离清洁与嘈杂生物阻抗信号方面的附加价值。我们比较了三种方法:启发式算法、基于特征的分类模型(SVM)和卷积神经网络(CNN)。数据集由 47 名慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者组成,他们进行了吸气阈负荷协议。在该协议期间,他们的呼吸通过生物阻抗设备和肺活量计进行记录,肺活量计作为金标准。四名注释员根据参考信号对信号中存在的伪影进行评分。我们已经表明,两种机器学习方法(SVM:87.77 ± 2.64%和 CNN:87.20 ± 2.78%)的准确性明显高于启发式方法(84.69 ± 2.32%)。此外,两种机器学习方法之间没有观察到显著差异。基于特征的和神经网络模型分别获得了 92.77±2.95%和 92.51±1.74%的 AUC。这些发现表明,数据驱动的方法可能有益于呼吸胸部生物阻抗信号中伪影检测任务。