Pacilè Serena, Lopez January, Chone Pauline, Bertinotti Thomas, Grouin Jean Marie, Fillard Pierre
Therapixel SA, 39 Rue Claude Daunesse, 06560 Valbonne, France (S.P., P.C., T.B., P.F.); Radiology & Imaging Services, Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, Newport Beach, Calif (J.L.); and Department of Statistics, University of Rouen, Rouen, France (J.M.G.).
Radiol Artif Intell. 2020 Nov 4;2(6):e190208. doi: 10.1148/ryai.2020190208. eCollection 2020 Nov.
To evaluate the benefits of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based tool for two-dimensional mammography in the breast cancer detection process.
In this multireader, multicase retrospective study, 14 radiologists assessed a dataset of 240 digital mammography images, acquired between 2013 and 2016, using a counterbalance design in which half of the dataset was read without AI and the other half with the help of AI during a first session and vice versa during a second session, which was separated from the first by a washout period. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and reading time were assessed as endpoints.
The average AUC across readers was 0.769 (95% CI: 0.724, 0.814) without AI and 0.797 (95% CI: 0.754, 0.840) with AI. The average difference in AUC was 0.028 (95% CI: 0.002, 0.055, = .035). Average sensitivity was increased by 0.033 when using AI support ( = .021). Reading time changed dependently to the AI-tool score. For low likelihood of malignancy (< 2.5%), the time was about the same in the first reading session and slightly decreased in the second reading session. For higher likelihood of malignancy, the reading time was on average increased with the use of AI.
This clinical investigation demonstrated that the concurrent use of this AI tool improved the diagnostic performance of radiologists in the detection of breast cancer without prolonging their workflow.© RSNA, 2020.
评估基于人工智能(AI)的工具在乳腺癌检测过程中对二维乳腺钼靶检查的益处。
在这项多阅片者、多病例回顾性研究中,14名放射科医生使用平衡设计评估了2013年至2016年间获取的240幅数字乳腺钼靶图像数据集。在第一次阅片过程中,一半数据集在无AI辅助的情况下阅读,另一半在AI辅助下阅读;在第二次阅片过程中,阅读顺序相反,两次阅片之间有洗脱期。将受试者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)、灵敏度、特异度和阅片时间作为评估指标。
无AI辅助时,阅片者的平均AUC为0.769(95%CI:0.724,0.814);有AI辅助时,平均AUC为0.797(95%CI:0.754,0.840)。AUC的平均差异为0.028(95%CI:0.002,0.055,P = 0.035)。使用AI辅助时,平均灵敏度提高了0.033(P = 0.021)。阅片时间随AI工具评分而变化。对于恶性可能性较低(<2.5%)的情况,第一次阅片时的时间大致相同,第二次阅片时略有减少。对于恶性可能性较高的情况,使用AI时阅片时间平均增加。
这项临床研究表明,同时使用该AI工具可提高放射科医生在乳腺癌检测中的诊断性能,且不会延长其工作流程。©RSNA,2020年。