Son Hyeck-Soo, Łabuz Grzegorz, Khoramnia Ramin, Yildirim Timur M, Auffarth Gerd U
Department of Ophthalmology, The David J. Apple International Laboratory for Ocular Pathology and International Vision Correction Research Centre (IVCRC), University of Heidelberg, INF 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
BMC Ophthalmol. 2021 May 4;21(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s12886-021-01958-8.
To assess the optical behavior of a new diffractive intraocular lens (IOL) and compare its performance to that of an established extended-depth-of-focus (EDOF) IOL.
This study assessed the Proming EDOF Multifocal AM2UX [Eyebright Medical Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd., China] and the AT LARA 829MP [Carl Zeiss Meditec, Germany]. An experimental set-up with 0.01% fluorescein solution and monochromatic light (532 nm) was used to visualize the IOLs' ray propagation. In addition, the optical quality of the IOLs was assessed by measuring the modulation transfer function (MTF) values at 50lp/mm and 3.0 and 4.5 mm apertures on the optical bench OptiSpheric® IOL PRO II [Trioptics GmbH, Germany].
The ray propagation of the two IOLs showed two distinct foci. Light intensity assessment revealed that both IOLs allocate more energy to primary than secondary focus. At 3.0 mm pupil, the MTF values at 50lp/mm for the primary focus were 0.39 and 0.37, and for the secondary focus, 0.29 and 0.26 for the AT LARA and Proming IOLs, respectively. At 4.5 mm pupil, the single-frequency MTF for the primary focus was 0.51 and 0.24 and for the secondary focus 0.21 and 0.15 for the AT LARA and Proming IOLs, respectively.
When tested with an aberration-free model cornea under monochromatic conditions, the Proming behaved as a low-add bifocal lens; however, its properties did not differ much from the well-established AT LARA EDOF IOL. The AT LARA outperformed the Proming at low defocus (up to 2D), while the latter demonstrated better image quality in the 2-3D range.
评估一种新型衍射人工晶状体(IOL)的光学性能,并将其性能与已有的扩展焦深(EDOF)IOL进行比较。
本研究评估了普明EDOF多焦点AM2UX[中国睛亮医疗科技(北京)有限公司]和AT LARA 829MP[德国卡尔蔡司医疗科技公司]。使用含有0.01%荧光素溶液和单色光(532nm)的实验装置来观察IOL的光线传播。此外,在德国Trioptics GmbH公司的OptiSpheric® IOL PRO II光具座上,通过测量50lp/mm以及3.0和4.5mm孔径下的调制传递函数(MTF)值来评估IOL的光学质量。
两种IOL的光线传播显示出两个明显的焦点。光强评估表明,两种IOL分配给主焦点的能量都比副焦点多。在3.0mm瞳孔直径时,AT LARA和普明IOL主焦点在50lp/mm处的MTF值分别为0.39和0.37,副焦点的MTF值分别为0.29和0.26。在4.5mm瞳孔直径时,AT LARA和普明IOL主焦点的单频MTF分别为0.51和0.24,副焦点的单频MTF分别为0.21和0.15。
在单色条件下使用无像差模型角膜进行测试时,普明IOL表现为低附加值双焦点透镜;然而,其性能与成熟的AT LARA EDOF IOL差异不大。在低离焦(高达2D)时,AT LARA的性能优于普明IOL,而后者在2 - 3D范围内显示出更好的图像质量。