Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Health Promot Pract. 2021 May;22(1_suppl):83S-90S. doi: 10.1177/1524839921996301.
In an arts in public health research team, artists may be undervalued as key research collaborators because of the difficulties in skillful integration of experts who possess not only different bodies of knowledge but also different ways of examining and valuing the world. Under the stewardship of two Rhode Island state agencies, an innovative research-driven enterprise, comprising researchers, clinicians, and community artists, was brought together to integrate arts-based interventions into statewide public health policy and practice. Here, we examine our work with the Rhode Island Arts and Health Advisory Group as a case study to illuminate our experiences in collaborating with artists on public health policy and practice research. Using existing frameworks from the literature, we define the attributes of, and challenges to, successful research collaborations and identify from our work how these apply to interdisciplinary collaborations between artists and public health practitioners. To support others working at the nexus of arts in public health, we include key experiences that were specific to the engagement of artists in research teams.
在一个公共卫生艺术研究团队中,艺术家可能因为难以巧妙地整合专家而被低估,这些专家不仅拥有不同的知识体系,而且还拥有不同的审视和评价世界的方式。在罗得岛州两个机构的管理下,一个创新的以研究为导向的企业将研究人员、临床医生和社区艺术家聚集在一起,将基于艺术的干预措施纳入全州公共卫生政策和实践中。在这里,我们将以罗得岛艺术与健康咨询小组的工作为例,研究我们在与艺术家合作进行公共卫生政策和实践研究方面的经验。我们使用文献中的现有框架来定义成功的研究合作的属性和挑战,并从我们的工作中确定这些属性和挑战如何适用于艺术家和公共卫生从业者之间的跨学科合作。为了支持在公共卫生艺术交叉领域工作的其他人,我们还包括了艺术家参与研究团队的特定关键经验。