Division of Global Public Health, Center on Gender Equity and Health, University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, United States of America.
Joint Doctoral Program, San Diego State University/University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2021 May 4;16(5):e0239565. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239565. eCollection 2021.
Quality of care in family planning traditionally focuses on promoting awareness of the broad array of contraceptive options rather than on the quality of interpersonal communication offered by family planning (FP) providers. There is a growing emphasis on person-centered contraceptive counselling, care that is respectful and focuses on meeting the reproductive needs of a couple, rather than fertility regulation. Despite the increasing global focus on person-centered care, little is known about the quality of FP care provided in low- and middle- income countries like India. This study involves the development and psychometric testing of a Quality of Family Planning Counselling (QFPC) measure, and assessment of its associations with contraceptives selected by clients subsequently.
We analyzed cross-sectional survey data from N = 237 women following their FP counselling in 120 public health facilities (District Hospitals and Community Health Centers) sampled across the state of Uttar Pradesh in India. The study captured QFPC, contraceptives selected by clients post-counselling, as well as client and provider characteristics. Based on formative research and using Principal Component Analysis, we developed a 13-item measure of quality of FP counselling. We used adjusted regression models to assess the association between QFPC and contraceptive selected post-counselling.
The QFPC measure demonstrated good internal reliability (Cronbach alpha = 0.80) as well as criterion validity, as indicated by client reports of high QFPC being significantly more likely for clients with trained versus untrained counsellors. We found that each point increase in QFPC, including increasing quality of counselling, is associated with higher odds of clients selecting an intrauterine device (IUD) (aRR:1.03; 95% CI:1.01-1.05) and sterilization (aRR:1.06; 95% CI:1.03-1.08), compared to no method selected.
High-quality FP counselling is associated with clients subsequently selecting more effective contraceptives, including IUD and sterilization, in India. High-quality counselling is also more likely among FP-trained providers, highlighting the need for focused training and monitoring of quality care.
CTRI/2015/09/006219. Registered 28 September 2015.
计划生育服务的质量传统上侧重于提高对各种避孕选择的认识,而不是计划生育提供者提供的人际沟通质量。人们越来越强调以人为主导的避孕咨询,这种咨询是尊重的,注重满足夫妻的生殖需求,而不是生育控制。尽管全球越来越关注以人为本的护理,但人们对印度等低收入和中等收入国家提供的计划生育服务质量知之甚少。本研究涉及开发和心理测量计划生育咨询质量(QFPC)的衡量标准,并评估其与随后客户选择的避孕方法的关联。
我们分析了来自印度北方邦 120 个公共卫生设施(地区医院和社区卫生中心)的 237 名妇女在接受计划生育咨询后的横断面调查数据。该研究记录了 QFPC、客户咨询后选择的避孕方法,以及客户和提供者的特征。基于形成性研究并使用主成分分析,我们开发了一个 13 项计划生育咨询质量衡量标准。我们使用调整后的回归模型评估 QFPC 与咨询后选择的避孕方法之间的关联。
QFPC 衡量标准表现出良好的内部可靠性(Cronbach alpha = 0.80)和标准有效性,因为客户报告高 QFPC 与受过培训的咨询师相比,客户更有可能选择接受培训的咨询师。我们发现,QFPC 每增加一点,包括咨询质量的提高,与客户选择宫内节育器(IUD)(ARR:1.03;95%CI:1.01-1.05)和绝育(ARR:1.06;95%CI:1.03-1.08)的几率更高,与未选择任何方法相比。
在印度,高质量的计划生育咨询与客户随后选择更有效的避孕方法有关,包括宫内节育器和绝育。在接受过计划生育培训的提供者中,高质量的咨询更有可能发生,这突出了需要集中培训和监测优质护理。
CTRI/2015/09/006219。于 2015 年 9 月 28 日注册。