• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者参与和知识交流的生活实验室:开发儿科康复生活实验室的探索性序贯混合方法研究。

Living labs for patient engagement and knowledge exchange: an exploratory sequential mixed methods study to develop a living lab in paediatric rehabilitation.

机构信息

College of Nursing, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Pediatrics and Child Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 May 4;11(5):e041530. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041530.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041530
PMID:33947723
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8098933/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Despite recognition of the importance of patient engagement in research and knowledge translation, systematic approaches to engagement and co-ideation remain limited. Living labs are collaborative knowledge sharing systems that use multimethod, user-centred approaches that hold potential to catalyse these aims. However, their use in healthcare is limited, and no living lab has been developed in paediatric rehabilitation. In response to this gap and to propel innovative knowledge exchange, we propose a mixed methods study to co-develop a living lab prototype (ie, preliminary infrastructure with opportunity for scale up) in paediatric rehabilitation, with relevance to other healthcare contexts.

METHODS

An exploratory sequential mixed methods study will be undertaken to determine research and knowledge exchange priorities and to inform the development of the living lab prototype. Stage 1: we will use a multipronged approach to sample 18-21 youth with developmental differences or rehabilitation needs, their youth siblings and parents/guardians from a provincial paediatric rehabilitation centre, to participate in qualitative and arts-based data collection. Data will provide insight into desirable features of the living lab. Stage 2: E-surveys to youth, siblings, parents/guardians and clinicians who receive or provide services at this same centre will expand on priorities and living lab features. Stage 3: integrated analysis will inform the living lab prototype development.

ANALYSIS

Inductive thematic analysis using interpretive description, integrated analysis of visual data and descriptive and content analysis of e-survey data will be undertaken. Joint displays will facilitate data integration. Priorities will be identified using a modified rank-order method for each key living lab domain.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Institutional ethics and site approval have been granted. A parent advisory group and rehabilitation engineering partners will confer on data and inform the development of the living lab prototype. User engagement with the prototype will occur during an online or in-person event, and findings shared through non-technical research summaries, journal articles and academic presentations.

摘要

简介

尽管人们认识到患者参与研究和知识转化的重要性,但系统的参与和共同构思方法仍然有限。生活实验室是一种协作的知识共享系统,它采用多方法、以用户为中心的方法,具有促进这些目标的潜力。然而,它们在医疗保健中的应用有限,而且在儿科康复领域还没有开发出生活实验室。针对这一差距,并推动创新知识交流,我们提出了一项混合方法研究,旨在共同开发儿科康复领域的生活实验室原型(即具有扩展机会的初步基础设施),同时与其他医疗保健环境相关。

方法

我们将进行一项探索性顺序混合方法研究,以确定研究和知识交流的重点,并为生活实验室原型的开发提供信息。第 1 阶段:我们将采用多管齐下的方法,从省级儿科康复中心招募 18-21 名有发育差异或康复需求的青少年及其青少年兄弟姐妹和父母/监护人,参与定性和基于艺术的数据收集。数据将提供有关生活实验室理想特征的见解。第 2 阶段:对在同一中心接受或提供服务的青少年、兄弟姐妹、父母/监护人以及临床医生进行电子调查,以扩展重点和生活实验室的特征。第 3 阶段:综合分析将为生活实验室原型的开发提供信息。

分析

我们将采用解释性描述的归纳主题分析、视觉数据的综合分析以及电子调查数据的描述性和内容分析,进行分析。联合展示将促进数据的整合。每个关键生活实验室领域都将使用一种修改后的等级排序方法来确定优先级。

伦理和传播

已经获得了机构伦理和现场批准。家长咨询小组和康复工程合作伙伴将对数据进行协商,并为生活实验室原型的开发提供信息。用户将通过在线或面对面的活动参与原型,通过非技术性的研究摘要、期刊文章和学术报告分享研究结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb7f/8098933/94b8207aa1ce/bmjopen-2020-041530f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb7f/8098933/94b8207aa1ce/bmjopen-2020-041530f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb7f/8098933/94b8207aa1ce/bmjopen-2020-041530f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Living labs for patient engagement and knowledge exchange: an exploratory sequential mixed methods study to develop a living lab in paediatric rehabilitation.患者参与和知识交流的生活实验室:开发儿科康复生活实验室的探索性序贯混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 May 4;11(5):e041530. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041530.
2
Protocol for a systematic review of living labs in healthcare.医疗保健领域中的 living labs 系统评价议定书。
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 5;11(2):e039246. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039246.
3
Youth perceptions and experiences of type 2 diabetes: Protocol for a collaborative knowledge translation approach and qualitative study.青年人群对 2 型糖尿病的认知和体验:一种协作式知识转化方法和定性研究的方案。
J Adv Nurs. 2021 Jul;77(7):3218-3225. doi: 10.1111/jan.14845. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
4
Evaluation of parent and youth experiences in advisory groups as part of a mental healthcare clinical trial: protocol for a mixed-method study.作为一项精神保健临床试验的一部分,评估家长和青年在咨询小组中的体验:一项混合方法研究的方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 17;12(6):e059689. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059689.
5
Rehabilitation Supported by Technology: Protocol for an International Cocreation and User Experience Study.技术支持的康复:一项国际共创与用户体验研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Mar 10;11(3):e34537. doi: 10.2196/34537.
6
Experiences and Priorities in Youth and Family Mental Health: Protocol for an Arts-Based Priority-Setting Focus Group Study.青年与家庭心理健康的经验及优先事项:一项基于艺术的优先事项设定焦点小组研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Nov 7;12:e50208. doi: 10.2196/50208.
7
Creation of an electronic patient-reported outcome measure platform Voxe: a mixed methods study protocol in paediatric solid organ transplantation.创建电子患者报告结局测量平台 Voxe:儿科实体器官移植中的一项混合方法研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 19;11(10):e053119. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053119.
8
Expert guidance for the rehabilitation of children with arthrogryposis: protocol using an integrated knowledge translation approach.先天性多发性关节挛缩症患儿康复的专家指南:采用综合知识转化方法的方案
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Feb 18;8(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00336-y.
9
Cocreating a Harmonized Living Lab for Big Data-Driven Hybrid Persona Development: Protocol for Cocreating, Testing, and Seeking Consensus.共同创建一个用于大数据驱动的混合角色开发的协调生活实验室:共同创建、测试和寻求共识的协议
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Jan 6;11(1):e34567. doi: 10.2196/34567.
10
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.

引用本文的文献

1
Building Emotional Awareness and Mental Health (BEAM): study protocol for a hybrid implementation-effectiveness trial of the BEAM app-based program for parents with clinical mental health problems.建立情绪意识与心理健康(BEAM):一项针对有临床心理健康问题的父母的基于BEAM应用程序的混合实施-效果试验的研究方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Jun 2;25(1):567. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06964-4.
2
Era of Digital Healthcare: Emergence of the Smart Patient.数字医疗时代:智能患者的出现。
Healthc Inform Res. 2025 Jan;31(1):107-110. doi: 10.4258/hir.2025.31.1.107. Epub 2025 Jan 31.
3
The Use of Arts-Based Methods to Enhance Patient Engagement in Health Research.

本文引用的文献

1
Co-Creating a Virtual Alcohol Prevention Simulation with Young People.与年轻人共同创建虚拟酒精预防模拟。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 9;17(3):1097. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17031097.
2
Orthopaedic surgeons' perceptions of frailty and frailty screening.骨科医生对虚弱和虚弱筛查的看法。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Jan 16;20(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1404-8.
3
Learning from usability testing of an arts-based knowledge translation tool for parents of a child with asthma.从一款面向哮喘患儿家长的艺术知识转化工具的可用性测试中学习。
运用基于艺术的方法提高患者在健康研究中的参与度。
Health Expect. 2024 Dec;27(6):e70127. doi: 10.1111/hex.70127.
4
Learning health systems and evidence ecosystems: a perspective on the future of evidence-based medicine and evidence-based guideline development.学习型卫生系统和证据生态系统:对循证医学和循证指南制定未来的展望。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Jan 4;22(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-01095-2.
5
Perceived factors informing the pre-acceptability of digital health innovation by aging respiratory patients: a case study from the Republic of Ireland.老龄化呼吸疾病患者对数字健康创新的可接受性的感知因素:来自爱尔兰共和国的案例研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Oct 24;11:1203937. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1203937. eCollection 2023.
6
Living Lab Experience in Turin: Lifestyles and Exposure to Black Carbon.都灵的生活实验室体验:生活方式和黑碳暴露。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 24;19(7):3866. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19073866.
7
Building a Research Roadmap for Caregiver Innovation: Findings from a Multi-Stakeholder Consultation and Evaluation.构建 caregiver 创新研究路线图:多利益相关者协商和评估的结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 23;18(23):12291. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312291.
8
Protocol for a systematic review of living labs in healthcare.医疗保健领域中的 living labs 系统评价议定书。
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 5;11(2):e039246. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039246.
Nurs Open. 2019 Sep 10;6(4):1615-1625. doi: 10.1002/nop2.369. eCollection 2019 Oct.
4
Living labs for health: an integrative literature review.健康生活实验室:综合文献回顾。
Eur J Public Health. 2020 Feb 1;30(1):55-63. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckz105.
5
The development of gerontechnology for hospitalized frail elderly people: The ALLEGRO hospital-based geriatric living lab.老年技术在住院体弱老年人中的发展:基于医院的老年生活实验室 ALLEGRO。
Maturitas. 2019 Jul;125:17-19. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2019.04.002. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
6
The Participatory Zeitgeist: an explanatory theoretical model of change in an era of coproduction and codesign in healthcare improvement.参与式时代精神:医疗保健改善中共同生产和共同设计时代变革的一种解释性理论模型。
Med Humanit. 2019 Sep;45(3):247-257. doi: 10.1136/medhum-2017-011398. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
7
Developing "My Asthma Diary": a process exemplar of a patient-driven arts-based knowledge translation tool.开发“我的哮喘日记”:一个患者驱动的基于艺术的知识转化工具的过程范例。
BMC Pediatr. 2018 Jun 5;18(1):186. doi: 10.1186/s12887-018-1155-2.
8
Transdisciplinary research for impact: protocol for a realist evaluation of the relationship between transdisciplinary research collaboration and knowledge translation.具有影响力的跨学科研究:跨学科研究合作与知识转化关系的现实主义评价方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 7;8(4):e021775. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021775.
9
Using Complexity and Network Concepts to Inform Healthcare Knowledge Translation.利用复杂性和网络概念为医疗保健知识转化提供信息。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Mar 1;7(3):231-243. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.79.
10
Moving knowledge into action for more effective practice, programmes and policy: protocol for a research programme on integrated knowledge translation.将知识转化为行动,以实现更有效的实践、项目和政策:综合知识转化研究计划方案。
Implement Sci. 2018 Feb 2;13(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0700-y.