• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估以患儿为中心的关怀中的图像支持(PicPecc):一项交叉设计研究方案。

Evaluating pictorial support in person-centred care for children (PicPecc): a protocol for a crossover design study.

机构信息

University of Gothenburg Centre for Person-Centred Care, and Institute of Health and Care Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden

Department of Paediatrics, Södra Älvsborg Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, Borås, Sweden.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 May 4;11(5):e042726. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042726.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042726
PMID:33947726
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8098982/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study protocol outlines the evaluation of the pictorial support in person-centred care for children (PicPecc). PicPecc is a digital tool used by children aged 5-17 years to self-report symptoms of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, who undergo high-dose methotrexate treatments. The design of the digital platform follows the principles of universal design using pictorial support to provide accessibility for all children regardless of communication or language challenges and thus facilitating international comparison.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Both effect and process evaluations will be conducted. A crossover design will be used to measure the effect/outcome, and a mixed-methods design will be used to measure the process/implementation. The primary outcome in the effect evaluation will be self-reported distress. Secondary outcomes will be stress levels monitored via neuropeptides, neurosteroids and peripheral steroids indicated in plasma blood samples; frequency of in-app estimation of high levels of distress by the children; children's use of analgesic medicine and person centeredness evaluated via the questionnaire Visual CARE Measure. For the process evaluation, qualitative interviews will be carried out with children with cancer, their legal guardians and case-related healthcare professionals. These interviews will address experiences with PicPecc in terms of feasibility and frequency of use from the child's perspective and value to the caseworker. Interview transcripts will be analysed using an interpretive description methodology.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval was obtained from the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (reference 2019-02392; 2020-02601; 2020-06226). Children, legal guardians, healthcare professionals, policymaking and research stakeholders will be involved in all stages of the research process according to Medical Research Council's guidelines. Research findings will be presented at international cancer and paediatric conferences and published in scientific journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT04433650.

摘要

简介

本研究方案概述了以儿童为中心的关怀中的图像支持(PicPecc)的评估。PicPecc 是一种数字工具,用于 5-17 岁的儿童自我报告急性淋巴细胞白血病的症状,这些儿童接受高剂量甲氨蝶呤治疗。该数字平台的设计遵循通用设计原则,使用图像支持为所有儿童提供无障碍服务,无论他们是否存在沟通或语言挑战,从而促进国际比较。

方法和分析

将同时进行效果和过程评估。将使用交叉设计来衡量效果/结果,同时使用混合方法设计来衡量过程/实施。效果评估的主要结果将是自我报告的痛苦。次要结果将是通过神经肽、神经甾体和外周甾体监测的应激水平,这些物质在血浆血液样本中显示;儿童在应用程序中自我评估高度痛苦的频率;通过问卷调查 Visual CARE Measure 评估儿童的镇痛药物使用和以人为主导的程度。对于过程评估,将对癌症儿童、其法定监护人以及与病例相关的医疗保健专业人员进行定性访谈。这些访谈将从儿童的角度出发,讨论他们对 PicPecc 的体验,包括可行性和使用频率,以及对案例工作者的价值。访谈记录将使用解释性描述方法进行分析。

伦理和传播

已从瑞典伦理审查局获得伦理批准(参考号 2019-02392;2020-02601;2020-06226)。根据医学研究委员会的指南,儿童、法定监护人、医疗保健专业人员、政策制定者和研究利益相关者将参与研究过程的所有阶段。研究结果将在国际癌症和儿科会议上展示,并发表在科学期刊上。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov;NCT04433650。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7ea/8098982/64f3041b64b4/bmjopen-2020-042726f06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7ea/8098982/c53ab5f56cfa/bmjopen-2020-042726f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7ea/8098982/74971b4ba3e3/bmjopen-2020-042726f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7ea/8098982/b419442da124/bmjopen-2020-042726f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7ea/8098982/b0ee31d1bafa/bmjopen-2020-042726f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7ea/8098982/8b223281a086/bmjopen-2020-042726f05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7ea/8098982/64f3041b64b4/bmjopen-2020-042726f06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7ea/8098982/c53ab5f56cfa/bmjopen-2020-042726f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7ea/8098982/74971b4ba3e3/bmjopen-2020-042726f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7ea/8098982/b419442da124/bmjopen-2020-042726f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7ea/8098982/b0ee31d1bafa/bmjopen-2020-042726f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7ea/8098982/8b223281a086/bmjopen-2020-042726f05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7ea/8098982/64f3041b64b4/bmjopen-2020-042726f06.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating pictorial support in person-centred care for children (PicPecc): a protocol for a crossover design study.评估以患儿为中心的关怀中的图像支持(PicPecc):一项交叉设计研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 May 4;11(5):e042726. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042726.
2
The Development of an mHealth Tool for Children With Long-term Illness to Enable Person-Centered Communication: User-Centered Design Approach.用于慢性病儿童以实现以人为本沟通的移动健康工具的开发:以用户为中心的设计方法。
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2022 Mar 8;5(1):e30364. doi: 10.2196/30364.
3
'Do you feel well or unwell?' A study on children's experience of estimating their nausea using the digital tool PicPecc.“你感觉好还是不好?”一项关于儿童使用数字工具 PicPecc 估计恶心程度的体验的研究。
J Child Health Care. 2023 Dec;27(4):654-666. doi: 10.1177/13674935221089746. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Being heard - Supporting person-centred communication in paediatric care using augmentative and alternative communication as universal design: A position paper.被倾听——在儿科护理中使用辅助和替代沟通作为通用设计支持以患者为中心的沟通:一份立场文件。
Nurs Inq. 2022 Apr;29(2):e12426. doi: 10.1111/nin.12426. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
6
Person-centred care transitions for people with stroke: study protocol for a feasibility evaluation of codesigned care transition support.以患者为中心的脑卒中患者护理转衔:对经共同设计的护理转衔支持进行可行性评估的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 23;11(12):e047329. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047329.
7
Study protocol for a feasibility study of an internet-administered, guided, CBT-based, self-help intervention (ENGAGE) for parents of children previously treated for cancer.一项针对曾接受癌症治疗儿童的家长的基于互联网管理、有指导的、认知行为疗法自助干预(ENGAGE)可行性研究的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 14;8(6):e023708. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023708.
8
A cross-sectional study on person-centred communication in the care of older people: the COMHOME study protocol.一项关于老年人护理中以患者为中心沟通的横断面研究:COMHOME研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2015 Apr 15;5(4):e007864. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007864.
9
Protocol for the process and feasibility evaluations of a new model of primary care service delivery for managing pain and function in patients with knee osteoarthritis (PARTNER) using a mixed methods approach.采用混合方法评估管理膝骨关节炎患者疼痛和功能的新型初级保健服务提供新模式(PARTNER)的过程和可行性的方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 4;10(2):e034526. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034526.
10
Transition program for adolescents with congenital heart disease in transition to adulthood: protocol for a mixed-method process evaluation study (the STEPSTONES project).先天性心脏病青少年向成年过渡期的过渡项目:混合方法过程评估研究方案(STEPSTONES 项目)。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 2;9(8):e028229. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028229.

引用本文的文献

1
Content validity of the electronic faces thermometer scale for pain in children: is a picture worth more than a thousand words?儿童疼痛电子面部温度计量表的内容效度:一张图片是否胜过千言万语?
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2024 Apr 11;5:1372167. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2024.1372167. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
A Systematic Review of Self-Report Instruments for the Measurement of Anxiety in Hospitalized Children with Cancer.癌症住院儿童焦虑的自评量表的系统评价
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 16;18(4):1911. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041911.
2
SPIRIT extension and elaboration for n-of-1 trials: SPENT 2019 checklist.针对单病例试验的SPIRIT扩展与细化:2019年SPENT清单
BMJ. 2020 Feb 27;368:m122. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m122.
3
Guidance on how to develop complex interventions to improve health and healthcare.关于如何制定复杂干预措施以改善健康和医疗保健的指南。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 15;9(8):e029954. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029954.
4
The Complexities of Nurses' Pain Assessment in Hospitalized Preverbal Children.住院前语言期儿童护士疼痛评估的复杂性
Pain Manag Nurs. 2019 Aug;20(4):337-344. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2018.11.060. Epub 2019 May 15.
5
The Experience of Pain and Pain Tool Preferences of Hospitalized Youth.住院青少年的疼痛体验及疼痛工具偏好
Pain Manag Nurs. 2019 Jun;20(3):245-252. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2018.12.003. Epub 2019 May 10.
6
Plasma creatinine as predictor of delayed elimination of high-dose methotrexate in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A Danish population-based study.血浆肌酐预测儿童急性淋巴细胞白血病大剂量甲氨蝶呤清除延迟:一项丹麦基于人群的研究。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2019 Jun;66(6):e27637. doi: 10.1002/pbc.27637. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
7
From complex social interventions to interventions in complex social systems: Future directions and unresolved questions for intervention development and evaluation.从复杂社会干预到复杂社会系统中的干预:干预发展与评估的未来方向及未解决的问题。
Evaluation (Lond). 2019 Jan;25(1):23-45. doi: 10.1177/1356389018803219. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
8
Children's Perceptions of Pictures Intended to Measure Anxiety During Hospitalization.儿童对旨在测量住院期间焦虑程度的图片的认知。
J Pediatr Nurs. 2019 Jan-Feb;44:63-73. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2018.10.015. Epub 2018 Nov 3.
9
Children's views on postsurgical pain in recovery units in Norway: A qualitative study.挪威术后恢复单元中儿童对术后疼痛的看法:一项定性研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2019 Jun;28(11-12):2157-2170. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14788. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
10
A Novel Targeted Analysis of Peripheral Steroids by Ultra-Performance Supercritical Fluid Chromatography Hyphenated to Tandem Mass Spectrometry.一种新型的超高效超临界流体色谱串联质谱法对外周类固醇的靶向分析。
Sci Rep. 2018 Nov 19;8(1):16993. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-35007-0.