• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

群体信任会削弱对新冠病毒风险的感知:来自三项实证研究的证据。

Perceived COVID-19 risk is attenuated by ingroup trust: evidence from three empirical studies.

机构信息

Research School of Psychology, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2021 May 5;21(1):869. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10925-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-021-10925-3
PMID:33952235
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8099388/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The social identity model of risk taking proposes that people take more risks with ingroup members because they trust them more. While this can be beneficial in some circumstances, in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic it has the potential to undermine an effective public health response if people underestimate the risk of contagion posed by ingroup members, or overestimate the risk of vaccines or treatments developed by outgroup members.

METHODS

Three studies (two prospective surveys, one experiment) with community-based adults tested the potential for the social identity model of risk taking to explain risk perception and risk taking in the context of COVID-19.

RESULTS

Study 1 was a two-wave study with a pre-COVID baseline, and found that people who identified more strongly as a member of their neighborhood pre-COVID tended to trust their neighbors more, and perceive interacting with them during COVID-19 lockdown to be less risky. Study 2 (N = 2033) replicated these findings in a two-wave nationally representative Australian sample. Study 3 (N = 216) was a pre-registered experiment which found that people indicated greater willingness to take a vaccine, and perceived it to be less risky, when it was developed by an ingroup compared to an outgroup source. We interpret this as evidence that the tendency to trust ingroup members more could be harnessed to enhance the COVID-19 response.

CONCLUSIONS

Across all three studies, ingroup members were trusted more and were perceived to pose less health risk. These findings are discussed with a focus on how group processes can be more effectively incorporated into public health policy, both for the current pandemic and for future contagious disease threats.

摘要

背景

冒险的社会认同模型提出,人们与群体内成员一起承担更多的风险,因为他们更信任他们。虽然在某些情况下这可能是有益的,但在 COVID-19 大流行的背景下,如果人们低估了群体内成员传染的风险,或者高估了群体外成员开发的疫苗或治疗方法的风险,这可能会破坏有效的公共卫生应对措施。

方法

三项基于社区的成年人的研究(两项前瞻性调查,一项实验)检验了冒险的社会认同模型在 COVID-19 背景下解释风险感知和风险承担的潜在作用。

结果

研究 1 是一项具有 COVID-19 基线的两波研究,发现 COVID-19 大流行前对自己所在社区认同度越高的人,往往越信任他们的邻居,并且认为在 COVID-19 封锁期间与他们互动的风险较低。研究 2(N=2033)在澳大利亚全国代表性的两波样本中复制了这些发现。研究 3(N=216)是一项预先注册的实验,发现与群体外来源相比,当疫苗由群体内来源开发时,人们表示更愿意接种疫苗,并认为它的风险较低。我们将此解释为证据,即更信任群体内成员的倾向可以被利用来增强 COVID-19 应对措施。

结论

在所有三项研究中,群体内成员更受信任,被认为健康风险较低。这些发现与如何将群体过程更有效地纳入公共卫生政策,无论是针对当前大流行还是未来的传染病威胁进行了讨论。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b1a/8101202/b176dfd6f604/12889_2021_10925_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b1a/8101202/3d4b65697c40/12889_2021_10925_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b1a/8101202/b0d07f1ef76e/12889_2021_10925_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b1a/8101202/95596ecbabd2/12889_2021_10925_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b1a/8101202/b176dfd6f604/12889_2021_10925_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b1a/8101202/3d4b65697c40/12889_2021_10925_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b1a/8101202/b0d07f1ef76e/12889_2021_10925_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b1a/8101202/95596ecbabd2/12889_2021_10925_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b1a/8101202/b176dfd6f604/12889_2021_10925_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Perceived COVID-19 risk is attenuated by ingroup trust: evidence from three empirical studies.群体信任会削弱对新冠病毒风险的感知:来自三项实证研究的证据。
BMC Public Health. 2021 May 5;21(1):869. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10925-3.
2
When trust goes wrong: A social identity model of risk taking.当信任出错时:风险承担的社会认同模型。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2021 Jan;120(1):57-83. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000243. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
3
Exploring predictors of Australian community members' blood donation intentions and blood donation-related behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic.探究澳大利亚社区成员在 COVID-19 大流行期间的献血意愿及其与献血相关行为的预测因素。
Transfusion. 2020 Dec;60(12):2907-2917. doi: 10.1111/trf.16067. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
4
COVID-19 vulnerability and perceived norm violations predict loss of social trust: A pre-post study.COVID-19 脆弱性和感知到的规范违反预测社会信任的丧失:一项前后测研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Dec;291:114513. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114513. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
5
Ingroup favoritism on perceived risk of infectious diseases.群体内对传染病风险感知的偏好。
Risk Anal. 2024 Feb;44(2):285-294. doi: 10.1111/risa.14183. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
6
To punish or to assist? Divergent reactions to ingroup and outgroup members disobeying social distancing.是惩罚还是帮助?对群体内和群体外成员违反社交距离的不同反应。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2020 Jul;59(3):594-606. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12395. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
7
Pandemic Fatigue: The Effects Of The COVID-19 Crisis On Public Trust And Compliance With Regulations In Israel.大流行疲劳:COVID-19 危机对以色列公众信任和法规遵守的影响。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2021 Aug;40(8):1225-1233. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.00171.
8
Association Between Public Knowledge About COVID-19, Trust in Information Sources, and Adherence to Social Distancing: Cross-Sectional Survey.公众对 COVID-19 的了解、对信息源的信任与遵守社交距离措施之间的关联:横断面调查。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Sep 15;6(3):e22060. doi: 10.2196/22060.
9
Excessive Media Consumption About COVID-19 is Associated With Increased State Anxiety: Outcomes of a Large Online Survey in Russia.过度关注新冠疫情相关媒体信息与状态焦虑增加有关:俄罗斯一项大型在线调查的结果
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 11;22(9):e20955. doi: 10.2196/20955.
10
Analysis of Public Perception of the Israeli Government's Early Emergency Instructions Regarding COVID-19: Online Survey Study.以色列政府关于新冠疫情早期紧急指示的公众认知分析:在线调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 15;22(5):e19370. doi: 10.2196/19370.

引用本文的文献

1
Community health workers' counseling is based on a deficit model of behavior change.社区卫生工作者的咨询基于行为改变的缺陷模型。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Jul 23;5(7):e0004167. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004167. eCollection 2025.
2
The role of the environment: how mask wearing varies across different activities.环境的作用:口罩佩戴在不同活动中的变化。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 10;24(1):1561. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18142-4.
3
Editorial: 'Divided or united': strengthening social cohesion for well-being and prosperity.

本文引用的文献

1
Scientific Advice at a Time of Emergency. SAGE and Covid-19.紧急时刻的科学建议。SAGE与新冠疫情。
Polit Q. 2020 Jul-Sep;91(3):514-522. doi: 10.1111/1467-923X.12885. Epub 2020 Aug 1.
2
Keep your (social) distance: Pathogen concerns and social perception in the time of COVID-19.保持(社交)距离:新冠疫情时期的病原体担忧与社会认知
Pers Individ Dif. 2020 Nov 1;166:110200. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110200. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
3
Not all worries were created equal: the case of COVID-19 anxiety.并非所有的担忧都是平等的:以 COVID-19 焦虑为例。
社论:“分裂还是团结”:加强社会凝聚力以实现福祉与繁荣。
Front Psychol. 2023 Nov 10;14:1278832. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1278832. eCollection 2023.
4
Believing in science: Linking religious beliefs and identity with vaccination intentions and trust in science during the COVID-19 pandemic.相信科学:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,将宗教信仰和身份与疫苗接种意愿以及对科学的信任联系起来。
Public Underst Sci. 2023 Nov;32(8):1003-1020. doi: 10.1177/09636625231174845. Epub 2023 Jun 5.
5
Trust and COVID precautionary measures during the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from two African countries.新冠疫情初期非洲两国的信任与新冠预防措施:来自两个非洲国家的证据
SSM Popul Health. 2023 Jun;22:101397. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2023.101397. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
6
A social identity approach to COVID-19 transmission in hospital settings.一种关于医院环境中新冠病毒传播的社会身份认同方法。
J Appl Soc Psychol. 2022 Nov 29. doi: 10.1111/jasp.12948.
7
The role of generalized trust in COVID-19 vaccine acceptance.广义信任在新冠疫苗接种接受度方面的作用。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 22;17(12):e0278854. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278854. eCollection 2022.
8
Asymmetrical friendships? People are willing to risk COVID-19 infection from friends but are reluctant to pass it on to them.不对称的友谊?人们愿意冒着被朋友传染新冠病毒的风险,但却不愿将病毒传染给他们。
J Appl Soc Psychol. 2022 Sep 23. doi: 10.1111/jasp.12927.
9
Individual difference predictors of starting a new romantic relationship during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间开始新恋情的个体差异预测因素。
Pers Individ Dif. 2023 Feb;201:111919. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2022.111919. Epub 2022 Sep 28.
10
The influence of social norms varies with "others" groups: Evidence from COVID-19 vaccination intentions.社会规范的影响因“他人”群体而异:来自 COVID-19 疫苗接种意愿的证据。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Jul 19;119(29):e2118770119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2118770119. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
Public Health. 2020 Aug;185:243-245. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.06.032. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
4
Collective resilience in times of crisis: Lessons from the literature for socially effective responses to the pandemic.集体韧性应对危机:从文献中汲取社会有效应对大流行病的经验。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2020 Jul;59(3):703-713. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12403. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
5
When trust goes wrong: A social identity model of risk taking.当信任出错时:风险承担的社会认同模型。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2021 Jan;120(1):57-83. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000243. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
6
A social identity perspective on COVID-19: Health risk is affected by shared group membership.从社会认同视角看新冠疫情:健康风险受共同群体归属影响。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2020 Jul;59(3):584-593. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12391. Epub 2020 May 31.
7
Harnessing behavioural science in public health campaigns to maintain 'social distancing' in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: key principles.在应对新冠疫情的公共卫生运动中运用行为科学以保持“社交距离”:关键原则
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020 Aug;74(8):617-619. doi: 10.1136/jech-2020-214290. Epub 2020 May 8.
8
Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response.利用社会和行为科学来支持 COVID-19 大流行应对。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 May;4(5):460-471. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0884-z. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
9
COVID-19 Transmission Within a Family Cluster by Presymptomatic Carriers in China.中国境内由症状前携带者在家庭集群内引发的 COVID-19 传播。
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Jul 28;71(15):861-862. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa316.
10
Shared social identification in mass gatherings lowers health risk perceptions via lowered disgust.群体聚集中共同的社会认同通过降低厌恶感来降低健康风险感知。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2020 Oct;59(4):839-856. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12362. Epub 2019 Dec 24.