• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当信任出错时:风险承担的社会认同模型。

When trust goes wrong: A social identity model of risk taking.

机构信息

Research School of Psychology.

Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2021 Jan;120(1):57-83. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000243. Epub 2020 Jun 4.

DOI:10.1037/pspi0000243
PMID:32496086
Abstract

Risk taking is typically viewed through a lens of individual deficits (e.g., impulsivity) or normative influence (e.g., peer pressure). An unexplored possibility is that shared group membership, and the trust that flows from it, may play a role in reducing risk perceptions and promoting risky behavior. We propose and test a Social Identity Model of Risk Taking in eight studies (total = 4,708) that use multiple methods including minimal group paradigms, correlational, longitudinal, and experimental designs to investigate the effect of shared social identity across diverse risk contexts. Studies 1 and 2 provided evidence for the basic premise of the model, showing that ingroup members were perceived as posing lower risk and inspired greater risk taking behavior than outgroup members. Study 3 found that social identification was a moderator, such that effect of shared group membership was strongest among high identifiers. Studies 4 and 5 among festival attendees showed correlational and longitudinal evidence for the model and further that risk-taking was mediated by trust, not disgust. Study 6 manipulated the mediator and found that untrustworthy faces were trusted more and perceived as less risky when they were ingroup compared with outgroup members. Studies 7 and 8 identified integrity as the subcomponent of trust that consistently promotes greater risk taking in the presence of ingroup members. The findings reveal that a potent source of risk discounting is the group memberships we share with others. Ironically, this means the people we trust the most may sometimes pose the greatest risk. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

冒险行为通常被视为个体缺陷(例如,冲动)或规范影响(例如,同伴压力)的一个视角。一个尚未被探索的可能性是,共同的群体成员身份以及由此产生的信任可能在降低风险感知和促进冒险行为方面发挥作用。我们提出并在八项研究中检验了风险承担的社会认同模型(总样本量为 4708 人),这些研究使用了多种方法,包括最小群体范式、相关、纵向和实验设计,以调查在不同风险背景下共享社会认同的影响。研究 1 和 2 为该模型的基本前提提供了证据,表明内群体成员被认为风险较低,并且激发了比外群体成员更大的冒险行为。研究 3 发现社会认同是一个调节因素,即共享群体成员身份的影响在高认同者中最强。在节日参与者中进行的研究 4 和 5 提供了该模型的相关和纵向证据,进一步表明信任而不是厌恶感是风险承担的中介因素。研究 6 操纵了中介因素,发现当不可信的面孔是内群体成员而不是外群体成员时,人们会更信任这些面孔,并认为它们的风险较低。研究 7 和 8 确定了信任的正直成分是在有内群体成员存在时始终促进更大风险承担的子成分。研究结果表明,风险折扣的一个有力来源是我们与他人共享的群体成员身份。具有讽刺意味的是,这意味着我们最信任的人有时可能会带来最大的风险。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2021 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
When trust goes wrong: A social identity model of risk taking.当信任出错时:风险承担的社会认同模型。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2021 Jan;120(1):57-83. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000243. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
2
Perceived COVID-19 risk is attenuated by ingroup trust: evidence from three empirical studies.群体信任会削弱对新冠病毒风险的感知:来自三项实证研究的证据。
BMC Public Health. 2021 May 5;21(1):869. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10925-3.
3
Identity fusion is associated with outgroup trust and social exploration: Evidence for the fusion-secure base hypothesis.身份融合与对外群体的信任及社会探索相关:融合-安全基地假说的证据。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2024 Jul;63(3):1184-1206. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12724. Epub 2024 Jan 25.
4
Justice reactions to deviant ingroup members: Ingroup identity threat motivates utilitarian punishments.对偏离群体成员的正义反应:群体认同受到威胁会促使采用功利性惩罚。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2019 Oct;58(4):869-893. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12312. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
5
Intergroup emotional exchange: Ingroup guilt and outgroup anger increase resource allocation in trust games.群体间情感交流:内群体内疚感和外群体愤怒感会增加信任游戏中的资源分配。
Emotion. 2019 Jun;19(4):605-616. doi: 10.1037/emo0000463. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
6
The socialization of perceived discrimination in ethnic minority groups.少数民族群体感知歧视的社会化。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2023 Sep;125(3):571-589. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000426. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
7
"They just don't understand us": The role of felt understanding in intergroup relations.“他们就是不理解我们”:内群体关系中被感受到的理解的作用。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020 Sep;119(3):633-656. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000221. Epub 2019 Oct 24.
8
Parochial trust and cooperation across 17 societies.17 个社会中的狭隘信任与合作。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Nov 28;114(48):12702-12707. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1712921114. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
9
Trust in virtual ingroup or outgroup members relies on perceived self-other overlap.对虚拟内群体或外群体成员的信任取决于感知到的自我-他人重叠。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 Aug;77(8):1581-1594. doi: 10.1177/17470218231203203. Epub 2023 Oct 24.
10
Perceived entitativity and the black-sheep effect: when will we denigrate negative ingroup members?感知同质性和害群之马效应:我们何时会诋毁负面的内群体成员?
J Soc Psychol. 2010 Mar-Apr;150(2):211-25. doi: 10.1080/00224540903366388.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparative analysis of distracted driving behavior among drivers of different income levels: A case study in huainan, China.不同收入水平驾驶员分心驾驶行为的比较分析:以中国淮南为例
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 27;10(7):e28668. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28668. eCollection 2024 Apr 15.
2
Connecting to Community: A Social Identity Approach to Neighborhood Mental Health.连接社区:一种邻里心理健康的社会认同方法。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2024 Aug;28(3):251-275. doi: 10.1177/10888683231216136. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
3
Situational pathogen avoidance mediates the impact of social connectedness on preventive measures during the COVID-19 pandemic.
情境病原体回避中介了社会连接对 COVID-19 大流行期间预防措施的影响。
Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 10;13(1):2418. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29239-y.
4
A social identity approach to COVID-19 transmission in hospital settings.一种关于医院环境中新冠病毒传播的社会身份认同方法。
J Appl Soc Psychol. 2022 Nov 29. doi: 10.1111/jasp.12948.
5
Identifying and Unpacking the Role of Social Identity in Moderating Evaluations of Police-Civilian Interactions.识别并剖析社会身份在调节警察与平民互动评价中的作用。
J Police Crim Psychol. 2023 Jan 14:1-26. doi: 10.1007/s11896-022-09559-x.
6
Asymmetrical friendships? People are willing to risk COVID-19 infection from friends but are reluctant to pass it on to them.不对称的友谊?人们愿意冒着被朋友传染新冠病毒的风险,但却不愿将病毒传染给他们。
J Appl Soc Psychol. 2022 Sep 23. doi: 10.1111/jasp.12927.
7
Student perceptions of the current drinking culture in three Australian residential colleges: Drinking motives, consequences and recommendations for harm minimisation strategies.澳大利亚三所住宿学院学生对当前饮酒文化的看法:饮酒动机、后果及减少伤害策略建议。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2023 Jan;42(1):135-145. doi: 10.1111/dar.13540. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
8
Measuring "we-ness" in couple relationships: A social identity approach.测量夫妻关系中的“我们感”:一种社会认同方法。
Fam Process. 2023 Jun;62(2):795-817. doi: 10.1111/famp.12811. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
9
COVID-safe behaviour before, during and after a youth mass gathering event: a longitudinal cohort study.在青少年群体聚集活动之前、期间和之后的 COVID-19 安全行为:一项纵向队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 12;12(7):e058239. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058239.
10
Individual and group level risk factors in preventive health and panic buying behaviors during COVID-19 pandemic in India.印度新冠疫情期间预防性健康和恐慌性购买行为中的个体及群体层面风险因素。
Curr Psychol. 2022 Apr 23:1-17. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-03098-8.