• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Description of the updated nutrition calculation of the Oxford WebQ questionnaire and comparison with the previous version among 207,144 participants in UK Biobank.描述牛津网络问卷(Oxford WebQ)营养计算的更新,并在 UK Biobank 中 207144 名参与者中与前一版本进行比较。
Eur J Nutr. 2021 Oct;60(7):4019-4030. doi: 10.1007/s00394-021-02558-4. Epub 2021 May 6.
2
Development and evaluation of the Oxford WebQ, a low-cost, web-based method for assessment of previous 24 h dietary intakes in large-scale prospective studies.开发和评估牛津网络问卷(Oxford WebQ),一种用于大规模前瞻性研究中评估过去 24 小时膳食摄入量的低成本、基于网络的方法。
Public Health Nutr. 2011 Nov;14(11):1998-2005. doi: 10.1017/S1368980011000942. Epub 2011 Jun 1.
3
The acceptability of repeat Internet-based hybrid diet assessment of previous 24-h dietary intake: administration of the Oxford WebQ in UK Biobank.基于互联网的重复混合饮食评估对先前24小时饮食摄入量的可接受性:在英国生物银行中应用牛津网络问卷
Br J Nutr. 2016 Feb 28;115(4):681-6. doi: 10.1017/S0007114515004821. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
4
Describing a new food group classification system for UK biobank: analysis of food groups and sources of macro- and micronutrients in 208,200 participants.描述英国生物库的一种新的食物组分类系统:在 208200 名参与者中分析食物组和宏量及微量营养素的来源。
Eur J Nutr. 2021 Aug;60(5):2879-2890. doi: 10.1007/s00394-021-02535-x. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
5
Validation of the Oxford WebQ Online 24-Hour Dietary Questionnaire Using Biomarkers.利用生物标志物验证牛津网络 24 小时膳食问卷
Am J Epidemiol. 2019 Oct 1;188(10):1858-1867. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwz165.
6
Evaluation of the New Individual Fatty Acid Dataset for UK Biobank: Analysis of Intakes and Sources in 207,997 Participants.评价英国生物银行新的个体脂肪酸数据集:207997 名参与者的摄入量和来源分析。
Nutrients. 2022 Aug 31;14(17):3603. doi: 10.3390/nu14173603.
7
Comparing Calculated Nutrient Intakes Using Different Food Composition Databases: Results from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) Cohort.比较使用不同食物成分数据库计算的营养素摄入量:欧洲癌症前瞻性调查和营养研究(EPIC)队列的结果。
Nutrients. 2020 Sep 23;12(10):2906. doi: 10.3390/nu12102906.
8
Online dietary intake estimation: the Food4Me food frequency questionnaire.在线膳食摄入量评估:Food4Me食物频率问卷
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Jun 9;16(6):e150. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3105.
9
Associations of fat and carbohydrate intake with cardiovascular disease and mortality: prospective cohort study of UK Biobank participants.脂肪和碳水化合物摄入量与心血管疾病和死亡率的关系:英国生物库参与者的前瞻性队列研究。
BMJ. 2020 Mar 18;368:m688. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m688.
10
Development and evaluation of a food frequency questionnaire to assess nutrient intakes of adult women in New Zealand.用于评估新西兰成年女性营养素摄入量的食物频率问卷的开发与评估。
Nutr Diet. 2020 Apr;77(2):253-259. doi: 10.1111/1747-0080.12472. Epub 2018 Sep 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Planetary Health Diet and risk of mortality and chronic diseases: Results from US NHANES, UK Biobank, and a meta-analysis.行星健康饮食与死亡率及慢性病风险:来自美国国家健康与营养检查调查、英国生物银行的结果及一项荟萃分析
Sci Adv. 2025 Sep 5;11(36):eadq5147. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adq5147.
2
Consumption of High-Energy Food and Sugar Shows a Strong Positive Association with Low Mood in Control Subjects and Depressed Patients.在对照组和抑郁症患者中,高能量食物和糖的摄入与情绪低落呈强正相关。
Nutrients. 2025 Aug 9;17(16):2594. doi: 10.3390/nu17162594.
3
Association between intake of various sugar subtypes and common mental disorders: A large prospective study.不同糖亚型的摄入量与常见精神障碍之间的关联:一项大型前瞻性研究。
J Nutr Health Aging. 2025 Aug 13;29(10):100647. doi: 10.1016/j.jnha.2025.100647.
4
Composite dietary antioxidant index and lung cancer risk: insights from the UK biobank.复合膳食抗氧化指数与肺癌风险:来自英国生物银行的见解
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 26;25(1):2560. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23720-1.
5
The association of essential dietary trace elements and their mixture with cognition: a prospective study.必需膳食微量元素及其混合物与认知的关联:一项前瞻性研究。
Front Nutr. 2025 Jul 4;12:1461852. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1461852. eCollection 2025.
6
Association between sulfur microbial diet and the risk of dementia: a large-scale prospective cohort study.硫微生物饮食与痴呆风险之间的关联:一项大规模前瞻性队列研究。
Nutr J. 2025 Jul 3;24(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s12937-025-01172-y.
7
Dietary carbohydrate intake and risks of overall and 21 site-specific cancers: a prospective cohort study.膳食碳水化合物摄入量与总体及21种特定部位癌症风险:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Front Nutr. 2025 Jun 18;12:1607358. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1607358. eCollection 2025.
8
Machine learning-assisted optimization of dietary intervention against dementia risk.机器学习辅助优化针对痴呆风险的饮食干预
Nat Hum Behav. 2025 Jul 2. doi: 10.1038/s41562-025-02255-w.
9
Mediterranean diet adherence and incident acute pancreatitis: a prospective cohort study.地中海饮食依从性与急性胰腺炎发病:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2025 Jun 12;18:17562848251346291. doi: 10.1177/17562848251346291. eCollection 2025.
10
High diversity of dietary flavonoid intake is associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality and major chronic diseases.饮食中黄酮类化合物摄入量的高度多样性与全因死亡率和主要慢性病的较低风险相关。
Nat Food. 2025 Jun 2. doi: 10.1038/s43016-025-01176-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Describing a new food group classification system for UK biobank: analysis of food groups and sources of macro- and micronutrients in 208,200 participants.描述英国生物库的一种新的食物组分类系统:在 208200 名参与者中分析食物组和宏量及微量营养素的来源。
Eur J Nutr. 2021 Aug;60(5):2879-2890. doi: 10.1007/s00394-021-02535-x. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
2
Validation of the Oxford WebQ Online 24-Hour Dietary Questionnaire Using Biomarkers.利用生物标志物验证牛津网络 24 小时膳食问卷
Am J Epidemiol. 2019 Oct 1;188(10):1858-1867. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwz165.
3
A systematic review of reviews identifying UK validated dietary assessment tools for inclusion on an interactive guided website for researchers: www.nutritools.org.一项系统评价综述,旨在确定英国已验证的饮食评估工具,以纳入一个互动式指导网站,供研究人员使用:www.nutritools.org。
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2020;60(8):1265-1289. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2019.1566207. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
4
Cohort Profile: the Million Women Study.队列简介:百万女性研究。
Int J Epidemiol. 2019 Feb 1;48(1):28-29e. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyy065.
5
Comparison of Sociodemographic and Health-Related Characteristics of UK Biobank Participants With Those of the General Population.英国生物银行参与者与普通人群的社会人口学特征及健康相关特征比较。
Am J Epidemiol. 2017 Nov 1;186(9):1026-1034. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx246.
6
Addressing Current Criticism Regarding the Value of Self-Report Dietary Data.回应当前关于自我报告饮食数据价值的批评。
J Nutr. 2015 Dec;145(12):2639-45. doi: 10.3945/jn.115.219634. Epub 2015 Oct 14.
7
UK biobank: an open access resource for identifying the causes of a wide range of complex diseases of middle and old age.英国生物银行:一个用于识别多种中老年复杂疾病病因的开放获取资源。
PLoS Med. 2015 Mar 31;12(3):e1001779. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001779. eCollection 2015 Mar.
8
Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic.组内一致性:kappa 统计量。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012;22(3):276-82.
9
Trans fats: chasing a global ban.反式脂肪:寻求全球禁令。
BMJ. 2011 Sep 7;343:d5567. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5567.
10
National Diet and Nutrition Survey: fat and fatty acid intake from the first year of the rolling programme and comparison with previous surveys.全国饮食与营养调查:滚动计划第一年的脂肪和脂肪酸摄入量以及与以往调查的比较。
Br J Nutr. 2012 Feb;107(3):405-15. doi: 10.1017/S0007114511002911. Epub 2011 Jul 18.

描述牛津网络问卷(Oxford WebQ)营养计算的更新,并在 UK Biobank 中 207144 名参与者中与前一版本进行比较。

Description of the updated nutrition calculation of the Oxford WebQ questionnaire and comparison with the previous version among 207,144 participants in UK Biobank.

机构信息

Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK.

Department of Public Health & Primary Care, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Nutr. 2021 Oct;60(7):4019-4030. doi: 10.1007/s00394-021-02558-4. Epub 2021 May 6.

DOI:10.1007/s00394-021-02558-4
PMID:33956230
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8437868/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The Oxford WebQ is a web-based 24-h dietary assessment method which has been used in UK Biobank and other large prospective studies. The food composition table used to calculate nutrient intakes has recently been replaced with the UK Nutrient Databank, which has food composition data closer in time to when participants completed the questionnaire, and new dietary variables were incorporated. Here we describe the updated version of the Oxford WebQ questionnaire nutrient calculation, and compare nutrient intakes with the previous version used.

METHODS

207,144 UK Biobank participants completed ≥ 1 Oxford WebQs, and means and standard deviations of nutrient intakes were averaged for all completed 24-h dietary assessments. Spearman correlations and weighted kappa statistics were used to compare the re-classification and agreement of nutrient intakes between the two versions.

RESULTS

35 new nutrients were incorporated in the updated version. Compared to the previous version, most nutrients were very similar in the updated version except for a few nutrients which showed a difference of > 10%: lower with the new version for trans-fat (- 20%), and vitamin C (- 15%), but higher for retinol (+ 42%), vitamin D (+ 26%) and vitamin E (+ 20%). Most participants were in the same (> 60%) or adjacent (> 90%) quintile of intake for the two versions. Except for trans-fat (r = 0.58, κ = 0.42), very high correlations were found between the nutrients calculated using the two versions (r > 0.79 and κ > 0.60).

CONCLUSION

Small absolute differences in nutrient intakes were observed between the two versions, and the ranking of individuals was minimally affected, except for trans-fat.

摘要

目的

牛津网络问卷(Oxford WebQ)是一种基于网络的 24 小时膳食评估方法,已在英国生物库(UK Biobank)和其他大型前瞻性研究中使用。用于计算营养素摄入量的食物成分表最近已被英国营养数据库(UK Nutrient Databank)所取代,该数据库中的食物成分数据更接近参与者完成问卷时的时间,并且还纳入了新的饮食变量。本文描述了更新后的牛津网络问卷问卷营养素计算版本,并比较了新旧版本的营养素摄入量。

方法

207144 名英国生物库参与者完成了≥1 次牛津网络问卷,所有完成的 24 小时膳食评估的营养素摄入量的平均值和标准差。使用 Spearman 相关系数和加权 kappa 统计量比较了两个版本之间营养素再分类和一致性的差异。

结果

更新版本中纳入了 35 种新营养素。与旧版本相比,更新版本中的大多数营养素非常相似,只有少数几种营养素的差异超过 10%:新版本中反式脂肪(-20%)和维生素 C(-15%)的含量较低,而视黄醇(+42%)、维生素 D(+26%)和维生素 E(+20%)的含量较高。对于两种版本,大多数参与者都处于相同(>60%)或相邻(>90%)的五分位数范围内。除反式脂肪(r=0.58,κ=0.42)外,两种版本计算的营养素之间存在非常高的相关性(r>0.79,κ>0.60)。

结论

两种版本之间观察到营养素摄入量的绝对差异较小,除反式脂肪外,个体的排名受影响最小。