• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Firewood, forests, and fringe populations: Exploring the inequitable socioeconomic dimensions of Liquified Petroleum Gas (LPG) adoption in India.柴火、森林与边缘人群:探究印度液化石油气(LPG)使用中不公平的社会经济层面
Energy Res Soc Sci. 2021 May;75. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2021.102012. Epub 2021 Mar 21.
2
Household Energy Interventions and Health and Finances in Haryana, India: An Extended Cost-Effectiveness Analysis印度哈里亚纳邦的家庭能源干预措施与健康和财务状况:一项扩展的成本效益分析
3
The drivers of sustained use of liquified petroleum gas in India.印度持续使用液化石油气的驱动因素。
Nat Energy. 2020 Jun;5(6):450-457. doi: 10.1038/s41560-020-0596-7. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
4
The Gendered Nature of Liquefied Petroleum Gas Stove Adoption and Use in Rural India.印度农村地区采用和使用液化石油气炉灶的性别差异
J Dev Stud. 2020;56(7):1309-1329. doi: 10.1080/00220388.2019.1657571. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
5
LPG as a Clean Cooking Fuel: Adoption, Use, and Impact in Rural India.液化石油气作为一种清洁烹饪燃料:在印度农村地区的采用、使用及影响
Energy Policy. 2018 Nov;122:395-408. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.07.042. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
6
Household Determinants of Liquified Petroleum Gas (LPG) as a Cooking Fuel in South West Cameroon.喀麦隆西南部家庭将液化石油气用作烹饪燃料的决定因素
Ecohealth. 2018 Dec;15(4):729-743. doi: 10.1007/s10393-018-1367-9. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
7
Household fuel mixes in peri-urban and rural Ecuador: Explaining the context of LPG, patterns of continued firewood use, and the challenges of induction cooking.厄瓜多尔城乡结合部和农村地区的家庭燃料组合:解读液化石油气的背景、持续使用柴火的模式以及电磁炉烹饪面临的挑战。
Energy Policy. 2020 Jan;136. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111053. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
8
Adoption and sustained use of cleaner cooking fuels in rural India: a case control study protocol to understand household, network, and organizational drivers.印度农村地区清洁烹饪燃料的采用与持续使用:一项了解家庭、网络及组织驱动因素的病例对照研究方案
Arch Public Health. 2017 Dec 14;75:70. doi: 10.1186/s13690-017-0244-2. eCollection 2017.
9
Exploring the impact of a liquefied petroleum gas intervention on time use in rural Peru: A mixed methods study on perceptions, use, and implications of time savings.探讨液化石油气干预对秘鲁农村时间利用的影响:一项关于节省时间的看法、使用和影响的混合方法研究。
Environ Int. 2020 Dec;145:105932. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105932. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
10
Distribution of sources of household air pollution: a cross-sectional study in Cameroon.家庭空气污染来源分布:喀麦隆的一项横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Feb 8;21(1):318. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10350-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Willingness to pay for cooking with electricity among rural households: The case of Southern Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚南部农村家庭用电烹饪的支付意愿
Heliyon. 2024 Dec 18;11(1):e41343. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41343. eCollection 2025 Jan 15.
2
Prediction of consumers refill frequency of LPG: A study using explainable machine learning.液化石油气消费者再充装频率的预测:一项使用可解释机器学习的研究。
Heliyon. 2023 Dec 18;10(1):e23466. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23466. eCollection 2024 Jan 15.
3
Land cover and forest health indicator datasets for central India using very-high resolution satellite data.利用高分辨率卫星数据生成印度中部的土地覆盖和森林健康指标数据集。
Sci Data. 2023 Oct 25;10(1):738. doi: 10.1038/s41597-023-02634-w.
4
Improved household living standards can restore dry tropical forests.提高家庭生活水平可以恢复干燥的热带森林。
Biotropica. 2022 Nov;54(6):1480-1490. doi: 10.1111/btp.12978. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
5
Equity, technological innovation and sustainable behaviour in a low-carbon future.低碳未来中的公平、技术创新与可持续行为。
Nat Hum Behav. 2022 Mar;6(3):326-337. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01257-8. Epub 2022 Jan 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Persistence of Solid Fuel Use in Rural North India.印度北部农村地区固体燃料使用情况的持续性
Econ Polit Wkly. 2020 Jan 18;55(3):55-62.
2
Household Transitions to Clean Energy in a Multi-Provincial Cohort Study in China.中国一项多省份队列研究中的家庭向清洁能源的转变
Nat Sustain. 2019 Nov 25;3(1):42-50. doi: 10.1038/s41893-019-0432-x.
3
Sustained LPG use requires progress on broader development outcomes.持续使用液化石油气需要在更广泛的发展成果方面取得进展。
Nat Energy. 2020 Jun;5(6):430-431. doi: 10.1038/s41560-020-0635-4. Epub 2020 Jun 5.
4
Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.204 个国家和地区 1990-2019 年 87 种风险因素的全球负担:2019 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet. 2020 Oct 17;396(10258):1223-1249. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30752-2.
5
The drivers of sustained use of liquified petroleum gas in India.印度持续使用液化石油气的驱动因素。
Nat Energy. 2020 Jun;5(6):450-457. doi: 10.1038/s41560-020-0596-7. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
6
The Role of Education and Attitudes in Cooking Fuel Choice: Evidence from two states in India.教育与态度在烹饪燃料选择中的作用:来自印度两个邦的证据。
Energy Sustain Dev. 2020 Feb;54:36-50. doi: 10.1016/j.esd.2019.09.003. Epub 2019 Nov 23.
7
LPG as a Clean Cooking Fuel: Adoption, Use, and Impact in Rural India.液化石油气作为一种清洁烹饪燃料:在印度农村地区的采用、使用及影响
Energy Policy. 2018 Nov;122:395-408. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.07.042. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
8
The Gendered Nature of Liquefied Petroleum Gas Stove Adoption and Use in Rural India.印度农村地区采用和使用液化石油气炉灶的性别差异
J Dev Stud. 2020;56(7):1309-1329. doi: 10.1080/00220388.2019.1657571. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
9
Everybody Stacks: Lessons from household energy case studies to inform design principles for clean energy transitions.人人参与:家庭能源案例研究的经验教训,为清洁能源转型提供设计原则参考。
Energy Policy. 2020 Jun;141. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111468. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
10
Supply Considerations for Scaling Up Clean Cooking Fuels for Household Energy in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.低收入和中等收入国家扩大用于家庭能源的清洁烹饪燃料供应的考量因素
Geohealth. 2019 Dec 3;3(12):370-390. doi: 10.1029/2019GH000208. eCollection 2019 Dec.

柴火、森林与边缘人群:探究印度液化石油气(LPG)使用中不公平的社会经济层面

Firewood, forests, and fringe populations: Exploring the inequitable socioeconomic dimensions of Liquified Petroleum Gas (LPG) adoption in India.

作者信息

Khanwilkar Sarika, Gould Carlos F, DeFries Ruth, Habib Bilal, Urpelainen Johannes

机构信息

Columbia University, New York, United States.

Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, United States.

出版信息

Energy Res Soc Sci. 2021 May;75. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2021.102012. Epub 2021 Mar 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.erss.2021.102012
PMID:33959474
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8095680/
Abstract

Liquified petroleum gas (LPG) is an important clean fuel alternative for households that rely on burning biomass for daily cooking needs. In India, (PMUY) has provided poor households with LPG connections since 2016. We investigate cooking fuel use in households to determine the impact of the policy in the Central Indian Highlands Landscape (CIHL). The CIHL has a large population of marginalized social groups, including Indigenous, Scheduled Tribe, Schedule Caste, and Other Backward Caste people. We utilize survey data from 4,994 households within 500 villages living in forested regions collected in 2018 and a satellite-derived measure of forest availability to investigate the household and ecological determinants of LPG adoption and the timing of this adoption (pre- or post-2016). In addition, we document patterns of firewood collection and evaluate the extent to which households acquiring LPG change these activities. The probability of cooking with LPG was lowest for marginalized social groups. We observe that households recently adopting LPG, likely through PMUY, are poorer, more socially marginalized, less educated, and have more forest available nearby than their early-adopter counterparts. While 90% of LPG-using households continue to use firewood, households that have owned LPG for more years report spending less time collecting firewood, indicating a waning reliance on firewood over time. Policies targeting communities with marginalized social groups living near forests can further accelerate LPG adoption and displace firewood use. Despite overall growth in LPG use, disparities in access to clean cooking fuels remain between socioeconomic groups in India.

摘要

液化石油气(LPG)是一种重要的清洁燃料,可供依赖燃烧生物质满足日常烹饪需求的家庭使用。在印度,自2016年以来,“普拉丹·曼特里·乌贾瓦拉雅ojana”(PMUY)已为贫困家庭提供了液化石油气连接。我们调查了家庭烹饪燃料的使用情况,以确定该政策对印度中部高地景观(CIHL)的影响。CIHL有大量边缘化社会群体,包括原住民、在册部落、在册种姓和其他落后种姓人群。我们利用2018年收集的500个森林地区村庄内4994户家庭的调查数据以及卫星得出的森林可利用量指标,来研究液化石油气采用的家庭和生态决定因素以及采用的时间(2016年之前还是之后)。此外,我们记录了柴火采集模式,并评估了获得液化石油气的家庭在多大程度上改变了这些活动。边缘化社会群体使用液化石油气做饭的概率最低。我们观察到,最近可能通过PMUY采用液化石油气的家庭比早期采用者更贫困、社会边缘化程度更高、受教育程度更低,且附近有更多森林。虽然90%使用液化石油气的家庭仍继续使用柴火,但拥有液化石油气时间更长的家庭报告称,花在采集柴火上的时间减少了,这表明对柴火的依赖随着时间的推移在减弱。针对居住在森林附近的边缘化社会群体社区的政策可以进一步加速液化石油气的采用并取代柴火的使用。尽管液化石油气的使用总体上有所增长,但印度社会经济群体在获得清洁烹饪燃料方面仍存在差距。