Suppr超能文献

脊髓损伤患者身体成分评估:范围综述。

Assessment of body composition in spinal cord injury: A scoping review.

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, THIS Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Peter Harrison Centre for Disability Sport, School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, National Centre for Sport and Exercise Medicine, Loughborough University, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 May 7;16(5):e0251142. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251142. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

The objective of this scoping review was to map the evidence on measurement properties of body composition tools to assess whole-body and regional fat and fat-free mass in adults with SCI, and to identify research gaps in order to set future research priorities. Electronic databases of PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane library were searched up to April 2020. Included studies employed assessments related to whole-body or regional fat and/or fat-free mass and provided data to quantify measurement properties that involved adults with SCI. All searches and data extractions were conducted by two independent reviewers. The scoping review was designed and conducted together with an expert panel (n = 8) that represented research, clinical, nutritional and lived SCI experience. The panel collaboratively determined the scope and design of the review and interpreted its findings. Additionally, the expert panel reached out to their professional networks to gain further stakeholder feedback via interactive practitioner surveys and workshops with people with SCI. The research gaps identified by the review, together with discussions among the expert panel including consideration of the survey and workshop feedback, informed the formulation of future research priorities. A total of 42 eligible articles were identified (1,011 males and 143 females). The only tool supported by studies showing both acceptable test-retest reliability and convergent validity was whole-body dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The survey/workshop participants considered the measurement burden of DXA acceptable as long as it was reliable, valid and would do no harm (e.g. radiation, skin damage). Practitioners considered cost and accessibility of DXA major barriers in applied settings. The survey/workshop participants expressed a preference towards simple tools if they could be confident in their reliability and validity. This review suggests that future research should prioritize reliability and validity studies on: (1) DXA as a surrogate 'gold standard' tool to assess whole-body composition, regional fat and fat-free mass; and (2) skinfold thickness and waist circumference as practical low-cost tools to assess regional fat mass in persons with SCI, and (3) females to explore potential sex differences of body composition assessment tools. Registration review protocol: CRD42018090187 (PROSPERO).

摘要

本范围综述的目的是绘制评估 SCI 成人全身和局部脂肪及去脂体重的人体成分工具测量特性的证据图谱,并确定研究空白,以便确定未来的研究重点。检索了 PubMed、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 图书馆的电子数据库,检索时间截至 2020 年 4 月。纳入的研究采用了与全身或局部脂肪和/或去脂体重相关的评估,并提供了量化涉及 SCI 成人的测量特性的数据。所有的检索和数据提取均由两名独立的审查员进行。范围综述是与代表研究、临床、营养和 SCI 生活经历的专家小组(n=8)共同设计和进行的。该小组共同确定了综述的范围和设计,并对其结果进行了解释。此外,专家小组还通过与 SCI 患者的互动实践调查和研讨会,向他们的专业网络征求进一步的利益相关者反馈。综述确定的研究空白,以及专家小组的讨论,包括考虑调查和研讨会的反馈,为制定未来的研究重点提供了信息。共确定了 42 篇符合条件的文章(1011 名男性和 143 名女性)。只有得到研究支持的工具显示出可接受的测试-重测可靠性和收敛效度,全身双能 X 射线吸收法(DXA)。调查/研讨会参与者认为 DXA 的测量负担是可以接受的,只要它是可靠、有效且不会造成伤害(如辐射、皮肤损伤)。从业者认为 DXA 在应用环境中的成本和可及性是主要障碍。调查/研讨会参与者表示,如果他们对工具的可靠性和有效性有信心,他们更喜欢简单的工具。本综述表明,未来的研究应优先考虑对以下方面的可靠性和有效性研究:(1)DXA 作为评估全身成分、局部脂肪和去脂体重的替代“金标准”工具;(2)皮褶厚度和腰围作为评估 SCI 患者局部脂肪量的实用低成本工具;(3)女性探索身体成分评估工具的潜在性别差异。注册审查方案:CRD42018090187(PROSPERO)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/975a/8104368/a50cfd00849b/pone.0251142.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验