• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家庭自测进行大规模 SARS-CoV-2 检测的可行性。

Feasibility of large-scale population testing for SARS-CoV-2 detection by self-testing at home.

机构信息

Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Clinical and Translational Digestive Research Group, University of Cantabria, IDIVAL, Santander, Spain.

Division of Epidemiology and Computational Biology, Cantabria University School of Medicine, Santander, Spain.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 May 10;11(1):9819. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89236-x.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-89236-x
PMID:33972607
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8110575/
Abstract

The simplicity and low cost of rapid point-of-care tests greatly facilitate large-scale population testing, which can contribute to controlling the spread of the COVID-19 virus. We evaluated the applicability of a self-testing strategy for SARS-CoV2 in a population-based, cross-sectional study in Cantabria, Spain, between April and May 2020. For the self-testing strategy, participants received the necessary material for the self-collection of blood and performance of a rapid antibody test using lateral flow immunoassay at home without the supervision of healthcare personnel. A total of 1,022 participants were enrolled. Most participants correctly performed the COVID-19 self-test the first time (91.3% [95% CI 89.4-92.9]). Only a minority of the participants (0.7%) needed the help of healthcare personnel, while 6.9% required a second kit delivery, for a total valid test result in 96.9% of the participants. Incorrect use of the self-test was not associated with the educational level, age over 65, or housing area. Prevalence of IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV2 for subjects with a valid rapid test result was 3.1% (95% CI 2.2-4.4), similar to the seroprevalence result obtained using a conventional approach carried out by healthcare professionals. In conclusion, COVID-19 self-testing should be considered as a screening tool.

摘要

快速床边检测的简单性和低成本极大地方便了大规模人群检测,有助于控制 COVID-19 病毒的传播。我们在西班牙坎塔布里亚的一项基于人群的横断面研究中评估了 SARS-CoV2 自我检测策略的适用性,该研究于 2020 年 4 月至 5 月进行。对于自我检测策略,参与者在家中自行采集血液并使用侧向流动免疫测定法进行快速抗体检测,为此他们收到了必要的材料,但无需医护人员的监督。共有 1022 名参与者入组。大多数参与者第一次正确完成了 COVID-19 自我检测(91.3% [95%CI 89.4-92.9])。只有少数参与者(0.7%)需要医护人员的帮助,而 6.9%需要再次配送试剂盒,因此 96.9%的参与者获得了有效的检测结果。自我检测使用不当与教育程度、65 岁以上年龄或住房面积无关。对于快速检测结果有效的参与者,针对 SARS-CoV2 的 IgG 抗体的阳性率为 3.1%(95%CI 2.2-4.4),与通过医护人员进行的常规方法获得的血清阳性率结果相似。总之,COVID-19 自我检测应被视为一种筛查工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc19/8110575/b06117a85505/41598_2021_89236_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc19/8110575/18644aac181d/41598_2021_89236_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc19/8110575/b06117a85505/41598_2021_89236_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc19/8110575/18644aac181d/41598_2021_89236_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc19/8110575/b06117a85505/41598_2021_89236_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Feasibility of large-scale population testing for SARS-CoV-2 detection by self-testing at home.家庭自测进行大规模 SARS-CoV-2 检测的可行性。
Sci Rep. 2021 May 10;11(1):9819. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89236-x.
2
Evaluation of the practicability of a finger-stick whole-blood SARS-Cov-2 self-test adapted for the general population.评估一种适用于普通人群的指尖全血 SARS-CoV-2 自我检测的实用性。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 28;16(1):e0245848. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245848. eCollection 2021.
3
[Seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG/IgM antibodies in Borgosesia (Piedmont Region, Northern Italy) population: a surveillance strategy in post-lockdown period?].[意大利北部皮埃蒙特大区博尔戈塞西亚人群中抗SARS-CoV-2 IgG/IgM抗体的血清流行率:封锁后时期的监测策略?]
Epidemiol Prev. 2020 Sep-Dec;44(5-6 Suppl 2):200-206. doi: 10.19191/EP20.5-6.S2.119.
4
The seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in a rural southwest community.农村西南社区 SARS-CoV-2 的血清阳性率。
J Osteopath Med. 2021 Feb 1;121(2):199-210. doi: 10.1515/jom-2020-0287.
5
SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence in Healthcare Workers of Kaunas Hospitals during the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic.COVID-19 大流行第一波期间考纳斯医院医护人员中 SARS-CoV-2 的血清流行率。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Feb 6;57(2):148. doi: 10.3390/medicina57020148.
6
Development and clinical application of a rapid IgM-IgG combined antibody test for SARS-CoV-2 infection diagnosis.新型冠状病毒感染诊断用快速 IgM-IgG 联合抗体检测试剂的研制与临床应用
J Med Virol. 2020 Sep;92(9):1518-1524. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25727. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
7
Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in over 6000 healthcare workers in Spain.西班牙6000多名医护人员中新型冠状病毒2型抗体的血清阳性率
Int J Epidemiol. 2021 May 17;50(2):400-409. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyaa277.
8
Antibody response using six different serological assays in a completely PCR-tested community after a coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak-the CoNAN study.在 2019 年冠状病毒病疫情后,对一个经过全面 PCR 检测的社区使用六种不同血清学检测方法进行抗体反应的研究——CoNAN 研究。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Mar;27(3):470.e1-470.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.11.009. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
9
Epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among firefighters/paramedics of a US fire department: a cross-sectional study.美国消防部门消防员/护理人员中 SARS-CoV-2 抗体的流行病学:一项横断面研究。
Occup Environ Med. 2020 Dec;77(12):857-861. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2020-106676. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
10
SARS-CoV-2 IgG/IgM Rapid Test as a Diagnostic Tool in Hospitalized Patients and Healthcare Workers, at a large Teaching Hospital in northern Italy, during the 2020 COVID-19 Pandemic.2020年新冠疫情期间,在意大利北部一家大型教学医院,将严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型IgG/IgM快速检测作为住院患者和医护人员的诊断工具。
New Microbiol. 2020 Oct;43(4):161-165. Epub 2020 Oct 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Acceptability of self-sampling and self-testing for infections: a rapid systematic review on public users' views.感染自我采样和自我检测的可接受性:关于公众用户观点的快速系统评价
BMC Public Health. 2025 Feb 20;25(1):695. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21773-w.
2
Evaluation of COVID-19 antigen rapid diagnostic tests for self-testing in Lesotho and Zambia.评估 COVID-19 抗原快速诊断检测试剂盒在莱索托和赞比亚的自我检测效果。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 29;19(2):e0280105. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280105. eCollection 2024.
3
Point of care detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and neutralisation capacity-lateral flow immunoassay evaluation compared to commercial assay to inform potential role in therapeutic and surveillance practices.

本文引用的文献

1
Antibody Responses in Seropositive Persons after a Single Dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccine.单剂 SARS-CoV-2 mRNA 疫苗接种后血清阳性者的抗体反应。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Apr 8;384(14):1372-1374. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2101667. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
2
The promise of direct-to-consumer COVID-19 testing: ethical and regulatory issues.面向消费者的新冠病毒检测的前景:伦理与监管问题
J Law Biosci. 2020 Sep 23;7(1):lsaa069. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsaa069. eCollection 2020 Jan-Jun.
3
Effective control of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in Wanzhou, China.中国万州有效控制 SARS-CoV-2 传播。
即时检测 SARS-CoV-2 抗体和中和能力-侧向流动免疫分析评估与商业检测相比,以告知其在治疗和监测实践中的潜在作用。
Front Public Health. 2023 Sep 28;11:1245464. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1245464. eCollection 2023.
4
Dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 seroassay sensitivity: a systematic review and modelling study.SARS-CoV-2 血清学检测敏感性的动态变化:系统评价和模型研究。
Euro Surveill. 2023 May;28(21). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2023.28.21.2200809.
5
Knowledge of SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection and proper use of rapid diagnostic self-test among Shanghai residents in China.中国上海居民对 SARS-CoV-2 抗原检测的了解程度以及对快速诊断自测的正确使用。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 24;11:1036823. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1036823. eCollection 2023.
6
Lateral Flow Immunoassays for SARS-CoV-2.用于检测新型冠状病毒的侧向流动免疫分析方法。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Nov 18;12(11):2854. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12112854.
7
Feasibility of home-based ELISA capillary blood self-testing for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies.居家酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA)检测抗新型冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)抗体的可行性。
Pract Lab Med. 2022 Aug;31:e00290. doi: 10.1016/j.plabm.2022.e00290. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
8
Good ingredients from foods to vegan cosmetics after COVID-19 pandemic.疫情后从食物到纯素化妆品的优质成分。
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2022 Aug;21(8):3190-3199. doi: 10.1111/jocd.15028. Epub 2022 Jun 4.
9
Evaluation of Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices Related to Self-Testing Procedure against COVID-19 among Greek Students: A Pilot Study.评价希腊学生对 COVID-19 自我检测程序的知识、态度和实践:一项初步研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 10;19(8):4559. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084559.
10
Assessment of the Field Utility of a Rapid Point-of-Care Test for SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in a Household Cohort.评估 SARS-CoV-2 抗体快速床边检测在家庭队列中的现场实用性。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2021 Nov 24;106(1):156-159. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.21-0592.
Nat Med. 2021 Jan;27(1):86-93. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-01178-5. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
4
Test sensitivity is secondary to frequency and turnaround time for COVID-19 screening.新冠病毒筛查时,检测敏感性次于检测频率和周转时间。
Sci Adv. 2021 Jan 1;7(1). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abd5393. Print 2021 Jan.
5
Rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection assay in comparison with real-time RT-PCR assay for laboratory diagnosis of COVID-19 in Thailand.泰国用于 COVID-19 实验室诊断的快速 SARS-CoV-2 抗原检测与实时 RT-PCR 检测的比较。
Virol J. 2020 Nov 13;17(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s12985-020-01452-5.
6
Comparison of practicability and effectiveness between unassisted HIV self-testing and directly assisted HIV self-testing in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: a randomized feasibility trial.刚果民主共和国非辅助 HIV 自我检测与直接辅助 HIV 自我检测实用性和效果的比较:一项随机可行性试验。
BMC Infect Dis. 2020 Nov 11;20(1):830. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-05554-x.
7
Serological antibody testing in the COVID-19 pandemic: their molecular basis and applications.新型冠状病毒肺炎大流行中的血清学抗体检测:其分子基础与应用。
Biochem Soc Trans. 2020 Dec 18;48(6):2851-2863. doi: 10.1042/BST20200744.
8
Analytical performance of lateral flow immunoassay for SARS-CoV-2 exposure screening on venous and capillary blood samples.侧向流动免疫分析用于静脉和毛细血管血样本的 SARS-CoV-2 暴露筛查的分析性能。
J Immunol Methods. 2021 Feb;489:112909. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2020.112909. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
9
Panbio antigen rapid test is reliable to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 infection in the first 7 days after the onset of symptoms.Panbio 抗原快速检测在症状出现后 7 天内对诊断 SARS-CoV-2 感染是可靠的。
J Clin Virol. 2020 Dec;133:104659. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104659. Epub 2020 Oct 16.
10
Diagnostic Salivary Tests for SARS-CoV-2.用于 SARS-CoV-2 的诊断性唾液检测。
J Dent Res. 2021 Feb;100(2):115-123. doi: 10.1177/0022034520969670. Epub 2020 Oct 31.