Suppr超能文献

地区护理中护士敏感结局:德尔菲研究。

Nurse-sensitive outcomes in district nursing care: A Delphi study.

机构信息

Research Centre for Healthy and Sustainable Living, Faculty of Health Care, University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Department of Health Services Research, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 May 13;16(5):e0251546. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251546. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine nurse-sensitive outcomes in district nursing care for community-living older people. Nurse-sensitive outcomes are defined as patient outcomes that are relevant based on nurses' scope and domain of practice and that are influenced by nursing inputs and interventions.

DESIGN

A Delphi study following the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method with two rounds of data collection.

SETTING

District nursing care in the community care setting in the Netherlands.

PARTICIPANTS

Experts with current or recent clinical experience as district nurses as well as expertise in research, teaching, practice, or policy in the area of district nursing.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Experts assessed potential nurse-sensitive outcomes for their sensitivity to nursing care by scoring the relevance of each outcome and the ability of the outcome to be influenced by nursing care (influenceability). The relevance and influenceability of each outcome were scored on a nine-point Likert scale. A group median of 7 to 9 indicated that the outcome was assessed as relevant and/or influenceable. To measure agreement among experts, the disagreement index was used, with a score of <1 indicating agreement.

RESULTS

In Delphi round two, 11 experts assessed 46 outcomes. In total, 26 outcomes (56.5%) were assessed as nurse-sensitive. The nurse-sensitive outcomes with the highest median scores for both relevance and influenceability were the patient's autonomy, the patient's ability to make decisions regarding the provision of care, the patient's satisfaction with delivered district nursing care, the quality of dying and death, and the compliance of the patient with needed care.

CONCLUSIONS

This study determined 26 nurse-sensitive outcomes for district nursing care for community-living older people based on the collective opinion of experts in district nursing care. This insight could guide the development of quality indicators for district nursing care. Further research is needed to operationalise the outcomes and to determine which outcomes are relevant for specific subgroups.

摘要

目的

确定社区居住老年人的地区护理中护士敏感的结果。护士敏感的结果被定义为基于护士的范围和实践领域相关的患者结果,并且受护理投入和干预的影响。

设计

遵循 RAND/UCLA 适宜性方法的德尔菲研究,共进行了两轮数据收集。

地点

荷兰社区护理环境中的地区护理。

参与者

具有当前或近期临床经验的地区护士专家,以及在地区护理领域的研究、教学、实践或政策方面的专业知识。

主要观察指标

专家通过对每个结果的相关性和结果受护理影响的能力(可影响性)对潜在的护士敏感结果进行护理敏感性评估。每个结果的相关性和可影响性均在 9 分制的李克特量表上进行评分。7 到 9 的组中位数表示该结果被评估为相关和/或可影响。为了衡量专家之间的一致性,使用分歧指数进行衡量,得分<1 表示一致。

结果

在德尔菲第二轮中,11 名专家评估了 46 个结果。共有 26 个结果(56.5%)被评估为护士敏感。在相关性和可影响性方面得分最高的护士敏感结果是患者的自主性、患者对护理提供的决策能力、患者对所提供的地区护理的满意度、临终和死亡的质量以及患者对所需护理的依从性。

结论

本研究基于地区护理专家的集体意见,确定了 26 个社区居住老年人地区护理的护士敏感结果。这一见解可以为地区护理的质量指标制定提供指导。需要进一步研究来使结果具体化,并确定哪些结果与特定亚组相关。

相似文献

1
Nurse-sensitive outcomes in district nursing care: A Delphi study.
PLoS One. 2021 May 13;16(5):e0251546. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251546. eCollection 2021.
2
Exploring nurse-sensitive patient outcomes in Dutch district nursing care: A survey study.
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):e5624-e5636. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13988. Epub 2022 Sep 11.
3
International experts' perspectives on the state of the nurse staffing and patient outcomes literature.
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2007;39(4):290-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2007.00183.x.
4
Evidence-based interventions and nurse-sensitive outcomes in district nursing care: A systematic review.
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2021 Nov 23;3:100053. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2021.100053. eCollection 2021 Nov.
5
Measuring the outcomes of nursing practice: A Delphi study.
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Jan;27(1-2):e368-e378. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13971. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
6
Establishing nursing-sensitive quality indicators for pediatric oncology: An international mixed methods Delphi study.
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2023 Jan;55(1):388-400. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12798. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
7
Integrative nursing in Europe - A competency profile for nursing students validated in a Delphi-study.
Nurse Educ Today. 2023 Jul;126:105807. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105807. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
9
Development of community nursing: analysis of the central services and practice dilemmas.
Int J Nurs Stud. 1996 Jun;33(3):297-308. doi: 10.1016/0020-7489(95)00067-4.
10
Nursing-sensitive quality indicators for quality improvement in Norwegian nursing homes - a modified Delphi study.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Oct 6;23(1):1068. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10088-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Establishing Standard Categories of Rehabilitation Approaches in Long-term Care: A Delphi Consensus Study.
Prog Rehabil Med. 2025 Jun 25;10:20250016. doi: 10.2490/prm.20250016. eCollection 2025.
3
Advancing District Nursing Care Through a Learning Healthcare System: A Viewpoint on Key Requirements.
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Dec 21;12(24):2576. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12242576.
7
Evidence-based interventions and nurse-sensitive outcomes in district nursing care: A systematic review.
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2021 Nov 23;3:100053. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2021.100053. eCollection 2021 Nov.
9
Exploring nurse-sensitive patient outcomes in Dutch district nursing care: A survey study.
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):e5624-e5636. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13988. Epub 2022 Sep 11.
10
Impact of family visit restrictions due to COVID-19 policy on patient outcomes: A cohort study.
J Adv Nurs. 2022 Dec;78(12):4042-4053. doi: 10.1111/jan.15325. Epub 2022 Jun 14.

本文引用的文献

1
International priorities for home care education, research, practice, and management: Qualitative content analysis.
Nurse Educ Today. 2019 Feb;73:83-87. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.11.020. Epub 2018 Dec 7.
2
Standard set of health outcome measures for older persons.
BMC Geriatr. 2018 Feb 2;18(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0701-3.
3
Quality indicators for community care for older people: A systematic review.
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 9;13(1):e0190298. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190298. eCollection 2018.
5
Substantial between-country differences in organising community care for older people in Europe-a review.
Eur J Public Health. 2016 Apr;26(2):213-9. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckv152. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
6
Systematic review of outcomes from home-based primary care programs for homebound older adults.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014 Dec;62(12):2243-51. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13088. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
8
Scale, causes, and implications of the primary care nursing shortage.
Annu Rev Public Health. 2014;35:443-57. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182508. Epub 2014 Jan 9.
9
interRAI home care quality indicators.
BMC Geriatr. 2013 Nov 19;13:127. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-13-127.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验