Suppr超能文献

通过可穿戴生物传感器记录的生理同步性进行协作学习质量分类。

Collaborative Learning Quality Classification Through Physiological Synchrony Recorded by Wearable Biosensors.

作者信息

Liu Yang, Wang Tingting, Wang Kun, Zhang Yu

机构信息

Institute of Education, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 29;12:674369. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.674369. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Interpersonal physiological synchrony has been consistently found during collaborative tasks. However, few studies have applied synchrony to predict collaborative learning quality in real classroom. To explore the relationship between interpersonal physiological synchrony and collaborative learning activities, this study collected electrodermal activity (EDA) and heart rate (HR) during naturalistic class sessions and compared the physiological synchrony between independent task and group discussion task. The students were recruited from a renowned university in China. Since each student learn differently and not everyone prefers collaborative learning, participants were sorted into collaboration and independent dyads based on their collaborative behaviors before data analysis. The result showed that, during group discussions, high collaboration pairs produced significantly higher synchrony than low collaboration dyads ( = 0.010). Given the equivalent engagement level during independent and collaborative tasks, the difference of physiological synchrony between high and low collaboration dyads was triggered by collaboration quality. Building upon this result, the classification analysis was conducted, indicating that EDA synchrony can identify different levels of collaboration quality (AUC = 0.767 and = 0.015).

摘要

在协作任务中,人际生理同步现象一直存在。然而,很少有研究将同步性应用于预测真实课堂中的协作学习质量。为了探究人际生理同步与协作学习活动之间的关系,本研究在自然主义课堂教学期间收集了皮肤电活动(EDA)和心率(HR),并比较了独立任务和小组讨论任务之间的生理同步性。这些学生来自中国一所知名大学。由于每个学生的学习方式不同,而且并非每个人都喜欢协作学习,因此在数据分析之前,根据参与者的协作行为将他们分为协作对子和独立对子。结果表明,在小组讨论期间,高协作对子产生的同步性显著高于低协作对子(p = 0.010)。鉴于独立任务和协作任务期间的参与水平相当,高协作对子和低协作对子之间生理同步性的差异是由协作质量引发的。基于这一结果,进行了分类分析,结果表明EDA同步性可以识别不同水平的协作质量(AUC = 0.767,p = 0.015)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/730f/8116552/07ccf31fe20c/fpsyg-12-674369-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验