• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

终生精神病理学评估:两种访谈方式的比较

The assessment of lifetime psychopathology: a comparison of two interviewing styles.

作者信息

Harrington R, Hill J, Rutter M, John K, Fudge H, Zoccolillo M, Weissman M

机构信息

Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, London.

出版信息

Psychol Med. 1988 May;18(2):487-93. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700008023.

DOI:10.1017/s0033291700008023
PMID:3399595
Abstract

A structured respondent-based version of the SADS-L interview was compared with a semi-structured investigator-based version of the same interview in terms of efficiency in assessing lifetime psychopathology. There was substantial agreement across most Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDC) categories, but there was less agreement on the rating of symptoms. The implications of these similarities and differences between the techniques are discussed.

摘要

在评估终生精神病理学方面,将基于结构化受访者的SADS-L访谈版本与基于半结构化调查员的同一访谈版本在效率上进行了比较。在大多数研究诊断标准(RDC)类别上存在实质性一致,但在症状评分上的一致性较低。讨论了这些技术之间异同的含义。

相似文献

1
The assessment of lifetime psychopathology: a comparison of two interviewing styles.终生精神病理学评估:两种访谈方式的比较
Psychol Med. 1988 May;18(2):487-93. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700008023.
2
Validation of a Brief Structured Interview: The Children's Interview for Psychiatric Syndromes (ChIPS).简短结构化访谈的验证:儿童精神综合征访谈(ChIPS)。
J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2016 Dec;23(4):327-340. doi: 10.1007/s10880-016-9474-7.
3
A comparison of two interview schedules. The Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia-Lifetime and the National Institute for Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule.两种访谈提纲的比较:情感障碍与精神分裂症终生访谈提纲和美国国立精神卫生研究所诊断访谈提纲。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1982 Jun;39(6):674-7. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1982.04290060036007.
4
The Psychiatric Assessment Schedule for Adult with Developmental Disability (PAS-ADD) Checklist: reliability and validity of French version.成人发育障碍患者精神科评估量表(PAS - ADD)检查表:法语版的信度和效度
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2013 Aug;57(8):758-65. doi: 10.1111/jir.12028. Epub 2013 Mar 11.
5
Psychometric properties of the Farsi translation of the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia-Present and Lifetime Version.《儿童情感障碍和精神分裂症量表(目前及终生版)》波斯语翻译版的心理测量特性。
BMC Psychiatry. 2006 Mar 15;6:10. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-6-10.
6
The Development and Well-Being Assessment: description and initial validation of an integrated assessment of child and adolescent psychopathology.发展与幸福评估:儿童和青少年精神病理学综合评估的描述与初步验证
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2000 Jul;41(5):645-55.
7
Past and present state examination: the assessment of 'lifetime ever' psychopathology.过去和当前状态检查:“终生曾患”精神病理学评估。
Psychol Med. 1986 May;16(2):461-5. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700009302.
8
Predictive validity of the K-SADS-PL 2009 version in school-aged and adolescent outpatients.2009年版K-SADS-PL在学龄期及青少年门诊患者中的预测效度。
Nord J Psychiatry. 2017 May;71(4):270-276. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2016.1276622. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
9
The acute psychiatric diagnostic interview.急性精神病诊断访谈。
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 1984 Dec;7(4):657-70.
10
[Preliminary comparative study of the personality disorder evaluation DIP instrument with the semi-structured SCID-II interview].[人格障碍评估工具DIP与半结构化访谈SCID-II的初步比较研究]
Encephale. 2009 Dec;35(6):544-53. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2008.09.007.

引用本文的文献

1
The Specific Role of Relationship Life Events in the Onset of Depression during Pregnancy and the Postpartum.人际关系生活事件在孕期和产后抑郁症发病中的特定作用。
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 8;10(12):e0144131. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144131. eCollection 2015.
2
Overrepresentation of mood and anxiety disorders in adults with autism and their first-degree relatives: what does it mean?自闭症成年患者及其一级亲属中情绪和焦虑障碍的过度呈现:这意味着什么?
Autism Res. 2008 Jun;1(3):193-7. doi: 10.1002/aur.23.