NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom; Population and Lifespan Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Dig Liver Dis. 2021 Aug;53(8):1028-1033. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2021.04.024. Epub 2021 May 18.
Capsule endoscopy (CE) interpretation requires the review of many thousands of images, with lesions often limited to just a few frames. In this study we aim to determine whether lesion detection declines according to the number of capsule videos read.
32 participants, 16 of which were novices (NR) and 16 experienced (ER) capsule readers took part in this prospective evaluation study. Participants read six capsule cases with a variety of lesions, in a randomly assigned order during a single sitting. Psychomotor Vigilance Tests and Fatigue Scores were recorded prior to commencing and then after every two capsules read. Changes in lesion detection and measures of fatigue were assessed across the duration of the study.
Mean agreement with the predefined lesions was 48.3% (SD:16.1), and 21.3% (SD:15.1) for the experienced and novice readers respectively. Lesion detection declined amongst experienced reader after the first study (p = 0.01), but remained stable after subsequent capsules read, while NR accuracy was unaffected by capsule numbers read. Objective measures of fatigue did not correlate with reading accuracy.
This study demonstrates that reader accuracy declines after reading just one capsule study. Subjective and objective measures of fatigue were not sufficient to predict the onset of the effects of fatigue.
胶囊内镜(CE)的解读需要对成千上万张图像进行审查,而病变通常只局限于少数几张图像。本研究旨在确定根据胶囊视频阅读数量,病变检出率是否会下降。
32 名参与者参加了这项前瞻性评估研究,其中 16 名为新手(NR),16 名为经验丰富的(ER)胶囊阅读者。参与者在一次会议中以随机顺序阅读了六个包含各种病变的胶囊病例。在开始前和每阅读两个胶囊后记录心理运动警戒测试和疲劳评分。评估研究过程中病变检出率和疲劳程度的变化。
经验丰富的读者和新手读者与预设病变的平均一致性分别为 48.3%(SD:16.1)和 21.3%(SD:15.1)。经验丰富的读者在第一次阅读后,病变检出率下降(p=0.01),但在随后的胶囊阅读后保持稳定,而 NR 的准确性不受阅读胶囊数量的影响。疲劳的客观测量与阅读准确性无关。
本研究表明,读者在阅读完一个胶囊研究后,准确性就会下降。主观和客观的疲劳测量不足以预测疲劳效应的发生。