• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机械循环支持治疗难治性院外心脏骤停:一项丹麦全国多中心研究。

Mechanical circulatory support for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a Danish nationwide multicenter study.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark.

Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.

出版信息

Crit Care. 2021 May 22;25(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03606-5.

DOI:10.1186/s13054-021-03606-5
PMID:34022934
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8141159/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) with either extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or Impella has shown potential as a salvage therapy for patients with refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). The objective of this study was to describe the gradual implementation, survival and adherence to the national consensus with respect to use of MCS for OHCA in Denmark, and to identify factors associated with outcome.

METHODS

This retrospective, observational cohort study included patients receiving MCS for OHCA at all tertiary cardiac arrest centers (n = 4) in Denmark between July 2011 and December 2020. Logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were used to determine association with outcome. Outcome was presented as survival to hospital discharge with good neurological outcome, 30-day survival and predictors of 30-day mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 259 patients were included in the study. Thirty-day survival was 26%. Sixty-five (25%) survived to hospital discharge and a good neurological outcome (Glasgow-Pittsburgh Cerebral Performance Categories 1-2) was observed in 94% of these patients. Strict adherence to the national consensus showed a 30-day survival rate of 30% compared with 22% in patients violating one or more criteria. Adding criteria to the national consensus such as signs of life during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), pre-hospital low-flow < 100 min, pH > 6.8 and lactate < 15 mmol/L increased the survival rate to 48%, but would exclude 58% of the survivors from the current cohort. Logistic regression identified asystole (RR 1.36, 95% CI 1.18-1.57), pulseless electrical activity (RR 1.20, 95% CI 1.03-1.41), initial pH < 6.8 (RR 1.28, 95% CI 1.12-1.46) and lactate levels > 15 mmol/L (RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.16-1.53) as factors associated with increased risk of 30-day mortality. Patients presenting signs of life during CPR had reduced risk of 30-day mortality (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.52-0.76).

CONCLUSIONS

A high survival rate with a good neurological outcome was observed in this Danish population of patients treated with MCS for OHCA. Stringent patient selection for MCS may produce higher survival rates but potentially withholds life-saving treatment in a significant proportion of survivors.

摘要

背景

体外膜肺氧合或 Impella 等机械循环支持已显示出作为难治性院外心脏骤停(OHCA)患者抢救治疗的潜力。本研究的目的是描述丹麦使用机械循环支持治疗 OHCA 的国家共识的逐步实施、生存情况和遵守情况,并确定与结果相关的因素。

方法

这是一项回顾性、观察性队列研究,纳入了 2011 年 7 月至 2020 年 12 月期间丹麦所有三级心脏骤停中心(n=4)接受 OHCA 机械循环支持治疗的患者。使用逻辑回归和 Kaplan-Meier 生存分析来确定与结果的关联。结果以出院时生存且神经功能良好、30 天生存和 30 天死亡率预测因素的比例表示。

结果

本研究共纳入 259 例患者。30 天生存率为 26%。65 例(25%)存活至出院,其中 94%的患者神经功能良好(格拉斯哥-匹兹堡脑功能表现分类 1-2 级)。严格遵守国家共识的患者 30 天生存率为 30%,而违反一条或多条标准的患者为 22%。将生命迹象、心肺复苏前低灌注<100min、pH>6.8 和乳酸<15mmol/L 等标准添加到国家共识中,可将生存率提高至 48%,但会将当前队列中的 58%的幸存者排除在外。逻辑回归确定停搏(RR 1.36,95%CI 1.18-1.57)、无脉性电活动(RR 1.20,95%CI 1.03-1.41)、初始 pH<6.8(RR 1.28,95%CI 1.12-1.46)和乳酸水平>15mmol/L(RR 1.16,95%CI 1.16-1.53)是与 30 天死亡率增加相关的因素。在 CPR 期间出现生命迹象的患者 30 天死亡率降低(RR 0.63,95%CI 0.52-0.76)。

结论

本丹麦 OHCA 患者机械循环支持治疗的生存结果良好,具有较高的生存率。对 MCS 进行严格的患者选择可能会提高生存率,但可能会使相当一部分幸存者失去救命治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e81/8141159/f12cc7b4f3ff/13054_2021_3606_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e81/8141159/27141c7879be/13054_2021_3606_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e81/8141159/163d593d0274/13054_2021_3606_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e81/8141159/d6a1356c5668/13054_2021_3606_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e81/8141159/f12cc7b4f3ff/13054_2021_3606_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e81/8141159/27141c7879be/13054_2021_3606_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e81/8141159/163d593d0274/13054_2021_3606_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e81/8141159/d6a1356c5668/13054_2021_3606_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e81/8141159/f12cc7b4f3ff/13054_2021_3606_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Mechanical circulatory support for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a Danish nationwide multicenter study.机械循环支持治疗难治性院外心脏骤停:一项丹麦全国多中心研究。
Crit Care. 2021 May 22;25(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03606-5.
2
Survival and neurological outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest treated with and without mechanical circulatory support.院外心脏骤停接受或未接受机械循环支持治疗后的生存情况及神经功能转归
Resusc Plus. 2022 Apr 6;10:100230. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2022.100230. eCollection 2022 Jun.
3
Neurological outcomes and duration from cardiac arrest to the initiation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a retrospective study.院外心脏骤停患者体外膜肺氧合启动与心脏骤停至开始之间的神经系统结局和持续时间:一项回顾性研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Sep 16;25(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0440-7.
4
A Pre-Hospital Extracorporeal Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation (ECPR) strategy for treatment of refractory out hospital cardiac arrest: An observational study and propensity analysis.一种用于治疗难治性院外心脏骤停的院前体外心肺复苏(ECPR)策略:一项观察性研究和倾向分析。
Resuscitation. 2017 Aug;117:109-117. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.04.014. Epub 2017 Apr 14.
5
Establishment of an extracorporeal cardio-pulmonary resuscitation program in Berlin - outcomes of 254 patients with refractory circulatory arrest.柏林体外心肺复苏项目的建立——254 例难治性循环骤停患者的结局。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2020 Sep 23;28(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s13049-020-00787-w.
6
Comparable Outcome of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest and In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Treated With Extracorporeal Life Support.体外生命支持治疗院外心脏骤停和院内心脏骤停的可比结果。
Artif Organs. 2018 Jan;42(1):15-21. doi: 10.1111/aor.12992. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
7
Use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for eCPR in the emergency room in patients with refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.在急诊科使用体外膜肺氧合对难治性院外心脏骤停患者进行 eCPR。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 28;15(9):e0239777. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239777. eCollection 2020.
8
Trends in utilization of mechanical circulatory support in patients hospitalized after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.院外心脏骤停后住院患者机械循环支持的使用趋势。
Resuscitation. 2018 Jun;127:105-113. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.04.007. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
9
Outcomes following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with an initial cardiac rhythm of asystole or pulseless electrical activity in Victoria, Australia.澳大利亚维多利亚州初始心律为心搏停止或无脉电活动的院外心脏骤停后的结局
Resuscitation. 2014 Nov;85(11):1633-9. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.07.015. Epub 2014 Aug 7.
10
Clinical outcomes after rescue extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.院外心脏骤停后挽救性体外心肺复苏的临床结局
Emerg Med J. 2017 Feb;34(2):107-111. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2015-204817. Epub 2016 Jun 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative analysis of inflammatory response on post resuscitation syndrome in extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation.体外心肺复苏中复苏后综合征炎症反应的对比分析
Resusc Plus. 2025 May 28;24:100995. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2025.100995. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Intestinal fatty acid-binding protein as a marker of prognosis and non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia in refractory cardiac arrest patients: a pilot study.肠道脂肪酸结合蛋白作为难治性心脏骤停患者预后及非闭塞性肠系膜缺血的标志物:一项初步研究。
Resusc Plus. 2025 May 5;24:100972. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2025.100972. eCollection 2025 Jul.
3
ECPR-the evolving role in cardiac arrest.

本文引用的文献

1
A systematic approach to weaning from extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in patients with refractory cardiac failure.一种对难治性心力衰竭患者体外膜肺氧合撤机的系统方法。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2021 Aug;65(7):936-943. doi: 10.1111/aas.13814. Epub 2021 Mar 27.
2
Prognostic value of signs of life throughout cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.心肺复苏期间生命征象对院外难治性心脏骤停的预后价值。
Resuscitation. 2021 May;162:163-170. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.022. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
3
Impella CP Implantation during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Cardiac Arrest: A Multicenter Experience.
心肺复苏术(ECPR)在心脏骤停中的作用演变。
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2024 Jul;119(Suppl 2):71-77. doi: 10.1007/s00063-024-01196-y. Epub 2024 Oct 9.
4
Different strategies in left ventricle unloading during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A network meta-analysis.静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合期间左心室卸载的不同策略:一项网状荟萃分析。
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2024 Sep 4;54:101506. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101506. eCollection 2024 Oct.
5
Association of hyperfibrinolysis with poor prognosis in refractory circulatory arrest: implications for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation.高纤溶与难治性循环停止不良预后相关:对体外心肺复苏的启示。
Br J Anaesth. 2024 Sep;133(3):500-507. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2024.05.034. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
6
Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for patients with refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a propensity score matching, observational study.体外心肺复苏治疗难治性院外心脏骤停患者:一项倾向评分匹配的观察性研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 30;14(1):9912. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-60620-7.
7
Return to Work After Refractory Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Patients Managed With or Without Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Nationwide Register-Based Study.难治性院外心脏骤停患者行体外心肺复苏与不行体外心肺复苏后重返工作岗位的情况:一项全国范围基于登记的研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Apr 2;13(7):e034024. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.034024. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
8
Prognostic value of arterial carbon dioxide tension during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients receiving extracorporeal resuscitation.体外心肺复苏治疗院外心脏骤停患者时动脉二氧化碳分压对预后的预测价值。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2024 Mar 21;32(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13049-024-01195-0.
9
Implementation of an extracorporeal resuscitation (ECPR) program for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Stockholm, Sweden: Feasibility, safety, and outcome.瑞典斯德哥尔摩市院外心脏骤停体外心肺复苏(ECPR)项目的实施:可行性、安全性及结果
Resusc Plus. 2024 Mar 7;18:100596. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100596. eCollection 2024 Jun.
10
Factors associated with favourable neurological outcomes following cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A retrospective multi-centre cohort study.院外心脏骤停心肺复苏后良好神经功能预后的相关因素:一项回顾性多中心队列研究。
Resusc Plus. 2024 Feb 8;17:100574. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100574. eCollection 2024 Mar.
心肺复苏期间用于心脏骤停的Impella CP植入术:一项多中心经验
J Clin Med. 2021 Jan 18;10(2):339. doi: 10.3390/jcm10020339.
4
Advanced reperfusion strategies for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and refractory ventricular fibrillation (ARREST): a phase 2, single centre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.针对院外心脏骤停和难治性心室颤动患者的高级再灌注策略(ARREST):一项 2 期、单中心、开放标签、随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2020 Dec 5;396(10265):1807-1816. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32338-2. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
5
Cost-effectiveness of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A multi-centre prospective cohort study.院外心脏骤停体外心肺复苏的成本效益:一项多中心前瞻性队列研究。
Resuscitation. 2020 Dec;157:32-38. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.10.009. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
6
Prospective observational study of mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and early reperfusion for refractory cardiac arrest in Sydney: the 2CHEER study.悉尼机械心肺复苏、体外膜氧合和早期再灌注治疗难治性心脏骤停的前瞻性观察性研究:2CHEER 研究。
Crit Care Resusc. 2020 Mar;22(1):26-34. doi: 10.51893/2020.1.oa3.
7
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiac arrest: a retrospective multicenter study.体外膜肺氧合治疗难治性心脏骤停:一项回顾性多中心研究。
Intensive Care Med. 2020 May;46(5):973-982. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-05926-6. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
8
Survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Europe - Results of the EuReCa TWO study.欧洲院外心脏骤停后的生存率——EuReCa TWO研究结果
Resuscitation. 2020 Mar 1;148:218-226. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.12.042. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
9
The differential neurologic prognosis of low-flow time according to the initial rhythm in patients who undergo extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation.体外心肺复苏患者中,根据初始心律划分的低流量时间的不同神经学预后。
Resuscitation. 2020 Mar 1;148:121-127. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.01.015. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
10
Improved Survival With Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Despite Progressive Metabolic Derangement Associated With Prolonged Resuscitation.体外心肺复苏术尽管与延长复苏相关的代谢恶化相关,但仍能提高生存率。
Circulation. 2020 Mar 17;141(11):877-886. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.042173. Epub 2020 Jan 3.