Vichianin Yudthaphon, Khummongkol Anutr, Chiewvit Pipat, Raksthaput Atthapon, Chaichanettee Sunisa, Aoonkaew Nuttapol, Senanarong Vorapun
Department of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Medical Technology, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Front Neurol. 2021 May 10;12:640696. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.640696. eCollection 2021.
The determination of brain volumes using visual ratings is associated with an inherently low accuracy for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). A support-vector machine (SVM) is one of the machine learning techniques, which may be utilized as a classifier for various classification problems. This study exploratorily investigated the accuracy of SVM classification models for AD subjects using brain volume and various clinical data as features. The study was designed as a retrospective chart review. A total of 201 eligible subjects were recruited from the Memory Clinic at Siriraj Hospital, Thailand. Eighteen cases were excluded due to incomplete MRI data. Subjects were randomly assigned to a training group (AD = 46, normal = 46) and testing group (AD = 45, normal = 46) for SVM modeling and validation, respectively. The results in terms of accuracy and a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis are reported. The highest accuracy for brain volumetry (62.64%) was found using the hippocampus as a single feature. A combination of clinical parameters as features provided accuracy ranging between 83 and 90%. However, a combination of brain volumetry and clinical parameters as features to the SVM models did not improve the accuracy of the result. In our study, the use of brain volumetry as SVM features provided low classification accuracy with the highest accuracy of 62.64% using the hippocampus volume alone. In contrast, the use of clinical parameters [Thai mental state examination score, controlled oral word association tests (animals; and letters K, S, and P), learning memory, clock-drawing test, and construction-praxis] as features for SVM models provided good accuracy between 83 and 90%.
使用视觉评分来确定脑容量,对于阿尔茨海默病(AD)的诊断而言,其准确性本质上较低。支持向量机(SVM)是机器学习技术之一,可作为各种分类问题的分类器。本研究探索性地研究了以脑容量和各种临床数据为特征的支持向量机分类模型对AD受试者的诊断准确性。该研究设计为回顾性病历审查。总共从泰国诗里拉吉医院记忆诊所招募了201名符合条件的受试者。由于MRI数据不完整,排除了18例。受试者被随机分配到训练组(AD = 46,正常 = 46)和测试组(AD = 45,正常 = 46),分别用于支持向量机建模和验证。报告了准确性和受试者工作特征曲线分析的结果。以海马体作为单一特征时,脑容量测定的最高准确率为62.64%。以临床参数组合作为特征时,准确率在83%至90%之间。然而,将脑容量测定和临床参数组合作为支持向量机模型的特征,并未提高结果的准确性。在我们的研究中,将脑容量测定作为支持向量机特征时,分类准确率较低,仅使用海马体体积时最高准确率为62.64%。相比之下,将临床参数[泰国精神状态检查评分、受控口语单词联想测试(动物;以及字母K、S和P)、学习记忆、画钟试验和结构实践]作为支持向量机模型的特征时,准确率在83%至90%之间,表现良好。