Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University.
Division of Adolescent/Young Adult Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital.
J Fam Psychol. 2022 Feb;36(1):23-34. doi: 10.1037/fam0000873. Epub 2021 May 27.
During and after the 2016 United States (U.S.) presidential election, discriminatory policies and stigmatizing rhetoric have been increasingly directed toward the transgender community at state and national levels. Transgender and/or nonbinary (TNB) adolescents, already at elevated risk for poorer health relative to their cisgender (nontransgender) peers, may have been adversely impacted by the shifting sociopolitical climate. This secondary analysis used qualitative data from the Trans Teen and Family Narratives Project to investigate how perceived shifts in the sociopolitical climate following the 2016 election affected families with TNB adolescents in the New England region of the U.S. (states of Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont). Data included two waves of semistructured interviews conducted with TNB adolescents and their caregivers and siblings (N = 20 families, 60 family members). Two coders analyzed transcripts using a thematic analysis approach. Emergent themes included: contemporary life for trans people in America (e.g., being discriminated against and dehumanized), perceptions of the national sociopolitical climate (e.g., anger toward political figures), forms of resistance and advocacy (e.g., confronting misinformation), and factors amplifying or buffering effects of the sociopolitical climate (e.g., the formation of alliances or coalitions within the family). Findings indicate the 2016 election spurred the redefinition of communication boundaries within, and outside, the immediate family, particularly regarding online communication and social media. TNB adolescents and their families anxiously anticipated changes in the sociopolitical climate and their foreseen impact on TNB adolescents' rights and safety. Implications for family therapy, intervention design, and policy reform are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
在 2016 年美国总统大选期间和之后,州和国家层面针对跨性别群体的歧视性政策和污名化言论日益增多。与顺性别(非跨性别)同龄人相比,已经处于健康状况较差风险中的跨性别和/或非二元性别(TNB)青少年,可能受到不断变化的社会政治环境的不利影响。本二次分析使用了来自跨青少年和家庭叙事项目的定性数据,以调查 2016 年大选后社会政治气候的变化如何影响美国新英格兰地区(康涅狄格州、缅因州、马萨诸塞州、新罕布什尔州、罗得岛州和佛蒙特州)的 TNB 青少年家庭。数据包括两次与 TNB 青少年及其照顾者和兄弟姐妹(N=20 个家庭,60 个家庭成员)进行的半结构化访谈。两名编码员使用主题分析方法分析了转录本。出现的主题包括:美国跨性别者的当代生活(例如,受到歧视和非人化)、对国家社会政治气候的看法(例如,对政治人物的愤怒)、抵抗和倡导的形式(例如,面对错误信息),以及放大或缓冲社会政治气候影响的因素(例如,在家庭内部形成联盟或联盟)。研究结果表明,2016 年的选举促使家庭内部和外部重新定义了沟通界限,特别是在网络沟通和社交媒体方面。TNB 青少年及其家庭急切地期待着社会政治气候的变化,以及他们对 TNB 青少年权利和安全的预期影响。讨论了对家庭治疗、干预设计和政策改革的影响。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2022 APA,保留所有权利)。