Trinity College of Arts & Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
J Prim Care Community Health. 2021 Jan-Dec;12:21501327211021021. doi: 10.1177/21501327211021021.
While healthcare organizations increasingly aim to address the social determinants of health (SDOH) in the clinic setting, there is little guidance on which staff are best equipped to assume this role. The present study is a scoping review of the peer-reviewed literature to characterize workforce models used to screen for and respond to patients' unmet social needs in ambulatory settings.
Four online databases were used to identify papers published until February 2021. Eligible articles were original research studies or systematic reviews that described the implementation of a standardized assessment for multiple SDOH domains and resulting activities to respond to individual patient needs (eg, referral to community resources) in ambulatory care settings.
Of the 1569 articles identified, 65 met study eligibility criteria. Majority of studies had observational study designs (11% were randomized control trials). For screening-related activities, more articles reported using traditional healthcare staff (51%), such as medical providers, medical assistants, and front-desk staff, than social care staff (32%), such as social workers and student volunteers. In contrast, for response-related activities, more articles reported using social care staff (88%) than traditional healthcare staff (60%). While we found wide variations in specific team configurations and training for the roles, social care staff generally provided more intensive forms of assistance than traditional healthcare staff.
While this review demonstrates the breadth of models for building or deploying a workforce to integrate health and social care, it also identifies the need for rigorous research on workforce development, implementation, and effectiveness.
虽然医疗机构越来越多地致力于在临床环境中解决健康的社会决定因素(SDOH)问题,但对于哪些员工最适合承担这一角色,几乎没有指导。本研究对同行评议文献进行了范围综述,以描述在门诊环境中用于筛查和满足患者未满足的社会需求的劳动力模式。
使用四个在线数据库确定截至 2021 年 2 月发表的论文。符合条件的文章是描述用于多个 SDOH 领域的标准化评估的实施以及针对个体患者需求(例如,转介到社区资源)的响应活动的原始研究或系统评价。
在确定的 1569 篇文章中,有 65 篇符合研究资格标准。大多数研究具有观察性研究设计(11%为随机对照试验)。对于筛查相关活动,更多的文章报告使用传统医疗保健人员(51%),如医疗提供者、医疗助理和前台工作人员,而不是社会护理人员(32%),如社会工作者和学生志愿者。相比之下,对于响应相关活动,更多的文章报告使用社会护理人员(88%)而不是传统医疗保健人员(60%)。虽然我们发现具体团队配置和角色培训存在广泛差异,但社会护理人员通常提供比传统医疗保健人员更密集的帮助形式。
虽然这项审查展示了构建或部署劳动力以整合医疗和社会保健的各种模式,但它也确定了需要对劳动力发展、实施和效果进行严格研究。