Suppr超能文献

影响学生参与选修形成性复习测验因素的混合方法探究

A Mixed Methods Exploration of Factors That Influence Student Participation in Optional Formative Review Quizzes.

作者信息

Jones Jessica M, Korula Rechna

机构信息

Georgetown University School of Medicine, 3900 Reservoir Road, Washington DC, NW 20057 USA.

出版信息

Med Sci Educ. 2021 May 24;31(4):1401-1410. doi: 10.1007/s40670-021-01321-y. eCollection 2021 Aug.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Weekly formative Review Quizzes are an integral feature of the Georgetown University School of Medicine assessment program. The Quizzes offer students an opportunity to test themselves in a low-stakes setting and then discuss their answers with peers in small groups; faculty are also present to help the groups with difficult problems.

METHODS

We conducted a mixed methods study in which we monitored quiz attendance over the course of the first four curricular blocks, deployed a study specific survey, and held focus groups to determine the factors that influenced quiz participation and how students perceived that the quiz contributed to their learning.

RESULTS

We observed that Quiz attendance, while initially robust, dropped steadily over the course of the year. Nearly all students reported that the practice questions along with faculty explanations contributed strongly to their learning. Fewer students felt that discussion with their peers was valuable, but those who valued peer discussion were significantly more likely to attend the quiz in person. The two things cited most often as barriers to quiz attendance were inconvenience and lack of adequate preparation. Many students reported that they saved questions and did not attempt to answer them until they had completed study of that subject.

DISCUSSION

Our results indicate that while there is ample evidence that early review and discussion with peers can contribute to learning, learners do not always recognize the value in this practice.

摘要

引言

每周的形成性复习测验是乔治敦大学医学院评估计划的一个重要组成部分。这些测验为学生提供了一个在低风险环境中自我测试的机会,然后与同伴以小组形式讨论答案;教师也会到场帮助小组解决难题。

方法

我们进行了一项混合方法研究,在头四个课程模块期间监测测验出勤情况,开展一项针对该研究的调查,并举行焦点小组讨论,以确定影响测验参与度的因素以及学生如何看待测验对他们学习的促进作用。

结果

我们观察到,测验出勤情况虽然一开始很踊跃,但在这一年中稳步下降。几乎所有学生都表示练习题以及教师的讲解对他们的学习有很大帮助。较少学生认为与同伴的讨论有价值,但那些重视同伴讨论的学生亲自参加测验的可能性显著更高。被提及最多的影响测验出勤的两个障碍是不方便和准备不充分。许多学生报告说他们把问题留着,直到完成该学科的学习才尝试回答。

讨论

我们的结果表明,虽然有充分证据表明早期复习和与同伴讨论有助于学习,但学习者并不总是认识到这种做法的价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a33/8368420/04ec8db37bbe/40670_2021_1321_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验