• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心理性别、用手偏好与携带书籍方式的性别差异。

Psychological gender, hand preferences, and sex differences in book-carrying styles.

作者信息

Alley T R, Kolker J I

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Clemson University, SC 29634-1511.

出版信息

Percept Mot Skills. 1988 Jun;66(3):815-22. doi: 10.2466/pms.1988.66.3.815.

DOI:10.2466/pms.1988.66.3.815
PMID:3405706
Abstract

Individuals with stronger sex-role identities may be expected to show greater conformity to sex-typed behaviors. Proceeding from this assumption, the sex-role status and sex of students using different styles of carrying books were compared. This study also examined whether over-all hand preference or age were related to carrying styles or sex-role status. Subjects completed a questionnaire comprised of the 24-item Personal Attributes Questionnaire of Spence and Helmreich, a 6-item scale of hand preference and a self-rating of sex-role identity. Afterwards, each subject's carrying style was covertly observed and recorded. Most subjects carried their materials in a sex-typical way or in book bags (for which no sex-typed carrying styles were discovered). As in previous studies, men in this study scored higher than women on masculinity and androgyny and lower on femininity. Hand preference was not related to sex-role status. Carrying style was not significantly correlated with any of the predictor variables for men, perhaps because almost no variance in carrying style was observed among them. Women who used masculine carrying styles tended to be older, have greater instrumentality, and a more masculine identity.

摘要

具有更强性别角色认同的个体可能会表现出对性别类型化行为更强的遵从性。基于这一假设,对使用不同方式携带书籍的学生的性别角色状况和性别进行了比较。本研究还考察了总体的利手偏好或年龄是否与携带方式或性别角色状况相关。受试者完成了一份问卷,其中包括斯彭斯和赫尔姆赖希的24项个人属性问卷、一份6项利手偏好量表以及一份性别角色认同自评。之后,对每个受试者的携带方式进行了暗中观察和记录。大多数受试者以符合性别特点的方式携带物品或使用书包(未发现书包存在性别类型化的携带方式)。与之前的研究一样,本研究中的男性在男性气质和双性化方面得分高于女性,在女性气质方面得分低于女性。利手偏好与性别角色状况无关。携带方式与男性的任何预测变量均无显著相关性,这可能是因为在他们当中几乎未观察到携带方式的差异。采用男性化携带方式的女性往往年龄更大,工具性更强,且具有更强烈的男性化身份认同。

相似文献

1
Psychological gender, hand preferences, and sex differences in book-carrying styles.心理性别、用手偏好与携带书籍方式的性别差异。
Percept Mot Skills. 1988 Jun;66(3):815-22. doi: 10.2466/pms.1988.66.3.815.
2
Relationship between parenting styles and gender role identity in college students.大学生养育方式与性别角色认同之间的关系。
Psychol Rep. 2014 Feb;114(1):250-71. doi: 10.2466/21.09.PR0.114k13w4.
3
Sex role attributes, symptom distress, and defensive style among college men and women.大学男女的性别角色属性、症状困扰和防御方式。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1984 Jul;47(1):182-92. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.47.1.182.
4
Masculinity and femininity in nursing.护理工作中的男性气质与女性气质。
Nurs Res. 1978 Sep-Oct;27(5):299-302.
5
Gender identity and its implications for the concepts of masculinity and femininity.性别认同及其对男性气质和女性气质概念的影响。
Nebr Symp Motiv. 1984;32:59-95.
6
Ratings of self and peers on sex role attributes and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity.自我及同伴对性别角色属性的评价及其与自尊以及男性气质和女性气质观念的关系。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1975 Jul;32(1):29-39. doi: 10.1037/h0076857.
7
Homosexual and heterosexual sex-role orientation on six sex-role scales.在六个性别角色量表上的同性恋和异性恋性别角色取向。
Percept Mot Skills. 1988 Jun;66(3):863-71. doi: 10.2466/pms.1988.66.3.863.
8
Masculine gender-role stress: predictor of anger, anxiety, and health-risk behaviors.男性性别角色压力:愤怒、焦虑和健康风险行为的预测因素。
J Pers Assess. 1988 Spring;52(1):133-41. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_12.
9
The identification of the social sex-role stereotypes.社会性别角色刻板印象的识别。
J Homosex. 1978 Spring;3(3):225-34. doi: 10.1300/J082v03n03_04.
10
An exploration of antecedents and attributes of androgynous and undifferentiated sex roles.对双性化和未分化性别角色的前因及特征的探究。
J Genet Psychol. 1978 Mar;132(1st Half):97-107. doi: 10.1080/00221325.1978.10533318.