Graduate School of Urban Studies, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Korea.
Department of City & Metropolitan Planning, College of Architecture + Planning, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 11;18(10):5084. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105084.
COVID-19 has sparked a debate on the vulnerability of densely populated cities. Some studies argue that high-density urban centers are more vulnerable to infectious diseases due to a higher chance of infection in crowded urban environments. Other studies, however, argue that connectivity rather than population density plays a more significant role in the spread of COVID-19. While several studies have examined the role of urban density and connectivity in Europe and the U.S., few studies have been conducted in Asian countries. This study aims to investigate the role of urban spatial structure on COVID-19 by comparing different measures of urban density and connectivity during the first eight months of the outbreak in Korea. Two measures of density were derived from the Korean census, and four measures of connectivity were computed using social network analysis of the Origin-Destination data from the 2020 Korea Transport Database. We fitted both OLS and negative binomial models to the number of confirmed COVID-19 patients and its infection rates at the county level, collected individually from regional government websites in Korea. Results show that both density and connectivity play an important role in the proliferation of the COVID-19 outbreak in Korea. However, we found that the connectivity measure, particularly a measure of network centrality, was a better indicator of COVID-19 proliferation than the density measures. Our findings imply that policies that take into account different types of connectivity between cities might be necessary to contain the outbreak in the early phase.
新冠疫情引发了一场关于人口密集城市脆弱性的辩论。一些研究认为,由于拥挤的城市环境中感染的机会更高,高密度的城市中心更容易受到传染病的影响。然而,其他研究则认为,在新冠疫情的传播中,连通性而非人口密度起着更重要的作用。虽然有几项研究考察了城市密度和连通性在欧洲和美国的作用,但在亚洲国家进行的研究很少。本研究旨在通过比较韩国疫情爆发头 8 个月的城市密度和连通性的不同度量标准,来探讨城市空间结构对新冠疫情的作用。两个密度度量标准是从韩国人口普查中得出的,四个连通性度量标准是使用 2020 年韩国交通数据库中的 Origin-Destination 数据进行社会网络分析计算得出的。我们使用 OLS 和负二项式模型拟合了确诊新冠病例数及其在县级的感染率,这些数据分别从韩国地区政府网站收集。结果表明,密度和连通性在韩国新冠疫情的传播中都起着重要作用。然而,我们发现连通性度量标准,特别是网络中心性度量标准,比密度度量标准更能说明新冠疫情的传播。我们的研究结果表明,在疫情早期,考虑到城市之间不同类型的连通性的政策可能是必要的。