Italian National Research Council, Institute of Clinical Physiology (CNR-IFC), via Moruzzi, 1, 56124 Pisa, Italy.
Centro Studi SOSE S.p.A. (Ministry of Economy and Finance), via Mentore Maggini, 48C, 00143 Rome, Italy.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 13;18(10):5174. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105174.
Cannabis accounts for the largest share of the illicit drug market, with a high prevalence of use even among adolescents. To tackle this longstanding problem, many kinds of reforms to national cannabis control policies have been implemented in Europe, but their effectiveness is still unclear. This paper analyses the association between selected categories of cannabis policy reforms and changes in perceived cannabis availability and patterns of use among adolescents. Data from 20 European countries across 15 years were drawn from a novel database of the European school Survey Project on Alcohol and other Drugs (ESPAD). Our analysis is based on a Difference-in-Differences design, which application is allowed by the fact that only thirteen out of the twenty countries included implemented policy changes. The results suggest that selected categories of reforms influence the availability and prevalence of cannabis use. In particular, some forms of restrictive intervention reduce the general prevalence of use and more liberal reforms seem linked to an increase in the share of students initiating use of cannabis. We find no evidence of an effect of policy changes on the share of frequent users, which are presumably those more likely to develop use-related health consequences.
大麻在非法毒品市场中占据最大份额,即使在青少年中,大麻的使用率也很高。为了解决这个长期存在的问题,欧洲已经实施了许多种国家大麻管制政策改革,但它们的效果仍不清楚。本文分析了大麻政策改革的某些类别与青少年感知到的大麻供应变化和使用模式之间的关联。这项研究的数据来自欧洲学校酒精和其他药物调查项目(ESPAD)的一个新数据库,涵盖了 15 年期间的 20 个欧洲国家。我们的分析基于差异中的差异设计,仅 20 个国家中有 13 个国家实施了政策改革,这一事实允许应用这种设计。结果表明,某些类别的改革会影响大麻的供应和流行程度。特别是,一些限制干预形式减少了大麻使用的普遍流行率,而更自由的改革似乎与开始使用大麻的学生比例增加有关。我们没有发现政策变化对经常使用者比例的影响的证据,这些人可能更容易出现与使用相关的健康后果。