• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Cannabis Policy Changes and Adolescent Cannabis Use: Evidence from Europe.大麻政策变化与青少年大麻使用:来自欧洲的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 13;18(10):5174. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105174.
2
Illicit drugs use in Georgian students; pilot study rigorously following criteria of European School Project on Alcohol and Other Drug.格鲁吉亚学生使用非法药物情况;严格遵循欧洲酒精及其他药物学校项目标准的试点研究
Georgian Med News. 2010 Mar(180):39-46.
3
[The levels of use of cannabis by adolescents and young adults: a comparison of European consumption].青少年和青年成年人使用大麻的情况:欧洲消费情况比较
Sante Publique. 2007 Nov-Dec;19(6):481-8. doi: 10.3917/spub.076.0481.
4
Socioeconomic Status, Parental Education, School Connectedness and Individual Socio-Cultural Resources in Vulnerability for Drug Use among Students.社会经济地位、父母受教育程度、学校联系和个体社会文化资源与学生吸毒易感性的关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 18;17(4):1306. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041306.
5
Daily exercise and anabolic steroids use in adolescents: a cross-national European study.青少年的日常锻炼与合成代谢类固醇使用:一项欧洲跨国研究。
Subst Use Misuse. 2008 Dec;43(14):2053-65. doi: 10.1080/10826080802279342.
6
'Are The Times A-Changin'? Trends in adolescent substance use in Europe.《时代在变吗?欧洲青少年物质使用趋势》
Addiction. 2018 Jul;113(7):1317-1332. doi: 10.1111/add.14201. Epub 2018 Apr 13.
7
Cannabis reduction among adolescents as spillover from successful tobacco control.青少年大麻使用量的减少是成功控烟的溢出效应。
Int J Drug Policy. 2024 Feb;124:104315. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.104315. Epub 2024 Jan 5.
8
Individual and country-level effects of cannabis-related perceptions on cannabis use. A multilevel study among adolescents in 32 European countries.个体和国家层面上的大麻认知对大麻使用的影响。32 个欧洲国家青少年的一项多层次研究。
J Adolesc Health. 2013 Apr;52(4):473-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.07.010. Epub 2012 Oct 18.
9
Perceived harmfulness of various alcohol- and cannabis use modes: Secular trends, differences, and associations with actual substance use behaviors among Norwegian adolescents, 2007-2015.各种酒精和大麻使用模式的感知危害性:挪威青少年 2007-2015 年的长期趋势、差异,以及与实际物质使用行为的关联。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019 Apr 1;197:280-287. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.02.003. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
10
Are cannabis prevalence estimates comparable across countries and regions? A cross-cultural validation using search engine query data.大麻流行率估计在国家和地区之间具有可比性吗?使用搜索引擎查询数据进行的跨文化验证。
Int J Drug Policy. 2013 Jan;24(1):23-9. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2012.05.002. Epub 2012 Jul 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Pan-Genome Analysis of : Insights on Genomic Diversity, Evolution, and Environment Adaption.关于:基因组多样性、进化及环境适应性见解的泛基因组分析
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Aug 28;26(17):8354. doi: 10.3390/ijms26178354.
2
CANN2021 survey and registry-linkages cohort on cannabis involvement among Norwegian high school students: design, measures and sample characteristics - cohort profile.2021年挪威高中生大麻使用情况调查与登记关联队列研究:设计、测量方法及样本特征——队列简介
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 22;15(7):e092475. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092475.
3
Cannabinoid Hyperemesis Syndrome in Adolescents: A Narrative Review.青少年大麻素呕吐综合征:一篇叙述性综述
Pediatr Rep. 2025 Jul 14;17(4):75. doi: 10.3390/pediatric17040075.
4
Navigating the Grey Zone: The Impact of Legislative Frameworks in North America and Europe on Adolescent Cannabis Use-A Systematic Review.探索灰色地带:北美和欧洲的立法框架对青少年大麻使用的影响——一项系统综述
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Jun 6;14(6):484. doi: 10.3390/bs14060484.
5
Cannabis reduction among adolescents as spillover from successful tobacco control.青少年大麻使用量的减少是成功控烟的溢出效应。
Int J Drug Policy. 2024 Feb;124:104315. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.104315. Epub 2024 Jan 5.
6
Concerns Related to the Consequences of Pediatric Cannabis Use: A 360-Degree View.与儿童使用大麻的后果相关的担忧:全方位视角。
Children (Basel). 2023 Oct 24;10(11):1721. doi: 10.3390/children10111721.
7
Alterations in rat prefrontal cortex kynurenic acid levels are involved in the enduring cognitive dysfunctions induced by tetrahydrocannabinol exposure during the adolescence.大鼠前额叶皮质犬尿烯酸水平的改变与青春期期间四氢大麻酚暴露所诱发的持续性认知功能障碍有关。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Nov 22;13:996406. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.996406. eCollection 2022.
8
Academic Achievements, Satisfaction with Studies and Risky Behaviours among First-Year Students of Kaunas (Lithuania) Universities, 2000-2017.2000-2017 年考纳斯(立陶宛)大学一年级学生的学业成绩、对学业的满意度和危险行为。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 22;19(13):7616. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137616.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing the public health impacts of legalizing recreational cannabis use: the US experience.评估休闲用大麻合法化对公众健康的影响:美国的经验。
World Psychiatry. 2020 Jun;19(2):179-186. doi: 10.1002/wps.20735.
2
The impact of cannabis legalization in Uruguay on adolescent cannabis use.乌拉圭大麻合法化对青少年大麻使用的影响。
Int J Drug Policy. 2020 Jun;80:102748. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102748. Epub 2020 May 6.
3
Socioeconomic Status, Parental Education, School Connectedness and Individual Socio-Cultural Resources in Vulnerability for Drug Use among Students.社会经济地位、父母受教育程度、学校联系和个体社会文化资源与学生吸毒易感性的关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 18;17(4):1306. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041306.
4
Association Between Recreational Marijuana Legalization in the United States and Changes in Marijuana Use and Cannabis Use Disorder From 2008 to 2016.美国休闲大麻合法化与 2008 年至 2016 年期间大麻使用和大麻使用障碍变化的关联。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2020 Feb 1;77(2):165-171. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.3254.
5
Early evidence of the impact of cannabis legalization on cannabis use, cannabis use disorder, and the use of other substances: Findings from state policy evaluations.大麻合法化对大麻使用、大麻使用障碍和其他物质使用影响的早期证据:州政策评估结果。
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2019;45(6):644-663. doi: 10.1080/00952990.2019.1669626. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
6
Does liberalisation of cannabis policy influence levels of use in adolescents and young adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis.大麻政策的自由化是否会影响青少年和年轻人的使用水平?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 10;9(7):e025880. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025880.
7
Association of Marijuana Laws With Teen Marijuana Use: New Estimates From the Youth Risk Behavior Surveys.大麻法律与青少年大麻使用的关联:来自青少年风险行为调查的新估计
JAMA Pediatr. 2019 Sep 1;173(9):879-881. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.1720.
8
Is policy 'liberalization' associated with higher odds of adolescent cannabis use? A re-analysis of data from 38 countries.政策“自由化”是否与青少年大麻使用几率升高有关?对来自 38 个国家的数据的再分析。
Int J Drug Policy. 2019 Apr;66:94-99. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.01.013. Epub 2019 Feb 16.
9
Prevalence of Cannabis Use in Youths After Legalization in Washington State.华盛顿州大麻合法化后青少年大麻使用的流行率。
JAMA Pediatr. 2019 Feb 1;173(2):192-193. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.4458.
10
'Parents are the best prevention'? Troubling assumptions in cannabis policy and prevention discourses in the context of legalization in Canada.“父母是最好的预防者”?在加拿大合法化背景下的大麻政策和预防话语中的令人不安的假设。
Int J Drug Policy. 2019 Jun;68:132-138. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.06.008. Epub 2018 Jul 17.

大麻政策变化与青少年大麻使用:来自欧洲的证据。

Cannabis Policy Changes and Adolescent Cannabis Use: Evidence from Europe.

机构信息

Italian National Research Council, Institute of Clinical Physiology (CNR-IFC), via Moruzzi, 1, 56124 Pisa, Italy.

Centro Studi SOSE S.p.A. (Ministry of Economy and Finance), via Mentore Maggini, 48C, 00143 Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 13;18(10):5174. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105174.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph18105174
PMID:34068202
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8152978/
Abstract

Cannabis accounts for the largest share of the illicit drug market, with a high prevalence of use even among adolescents. To tackle this longstanding problem, many kinds of reforms to national cannabis control policies have been implemented in Europe, but their effectiveness is still unclear. This paper analyses the association between selected categories of cannabis policy reforms and changes in perceived cannabis availability and patterns of use among adolescents. Data from 20 European countries across 15 years were drawn from a novel database of the European school Survey Project on Alcohol and other Drugs (ESPAD). Our analysis is based on a Difference-in-Differences design, which application is allowed by the fact that only thirteen out of the twenty countries included implemented policy changes. The results suggest that selected categories of reforms influence the availability and prevalence of cannabis use. In particular, some forms of restrictive intervention reduce the general prevalence of use and more liberal reforms seem linked to an increase in the share of students initiating use of cannabis. We find no evidence of an effect of policy changes on the share of frequent users, which are presumably those more likely to develop use-related health consequences.

摘要

大麻在非法毒品市场中占据最大份额,即使在青少年中,大麻的使用率也很高。为了解决这个长期存在的问题,欧洲已经实施了许多种国家大麻管制政策改革,但它们的效果仍不清楚。本文分析了大麻政策改革的某些类别与青少年感知到的大麻供应变化和使用模式之间的关联。这项研究的数据来自欧洲学校酒精和其他药物调查项目(ESPAD)的一个新数据库,涵盖了 15 年期间的 20 个欧洲国家。我们的分析基于差异中的差异设计,仅 20 个国家中有 13 个国家实施了政策改革,这一事实允许应用这种设计。结果表明,某些类别的改革会影响大麻的供应和流行程度。特别是,一些限制干预形式减少了大麻使用的普遍流行率,而更自由的改革似乎与开始使用大麻的学生比例增加有关。我们没有发现政策变化对经常使用者比例的影响的证据,这些人可能更容易出现与使用相关的健康后果。