• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应用EN 16615(四场试验)评估所选商用和自制消毒湿巾的抗菌活性。

Application of EN 16615 (4-Field Test) for the Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Activity of the Selected Commercial and Self-Made Disinfectant Wipes.

作者信息

Tyski Stefan, Grzybowska Wanda, Bocian Ewa

机构信息

Department of Antibiotics and Microbiology, National Medicines Institute, 00-725 Warsaw, Poland.

Department of Pharmaceutical Microbiology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-007 Warsaw, Poland.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 31;18(11):5932. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115932.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph18115932
PMID:34073065
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8198427/
Abstract

The purpose of disinfectants is to reduce microorganisms on a contaminated surface and to prevent the spread of microorganisms. The relatively new EN 16615 simulates disinfection by wiping and allows for assessing the recovery of microorganisms from the surface and, importantly, the degree of spread of microorganisms when the surface is disinfected by wiping. For the first time, using this standard, the tested products in the form of commercial disinfectant wipes were compared with self-made wipes soaked in respective disinfectant liquids. The disinfected surfaces were simulated by homogeneous polyvinyl chloride plates. The studies were carried out not only with the standard, but also with clinical multidrug-resistant microbial strains. Based on the research, it can be concluded that the most effective products in the disinfection process (log reduction of ≥5) with the shortest contact time (1 min) were products containing ethanol, propanol, and quaternary ammonium compounds (self-made wipes) and propanol (commercial wipes). The least effective products (log reduction of <5) in terms of the contact time declared by the manufacturer were products containing ethanol and sodium hypochlorite (commercial wipes). Much better antimicrobial activity of self-made wipes was observed in comparison to the activity of the commercial wipes.

摘要

消毒剂的目的是减少污染表面的微生物并防止微生物传播。相对较新的EN 16615标准模拟擦拭消毒,并允许评估从表面回收微生物的情况,重要的是,还能评估通过擦拭对表面进行消毒时微生物的传播程度。首次使用该标准,将市售消毒湿巾形式的受试产品与浸泡在各自消毒液体中的自制湿巾进行了比较。用均质聚氯乙烯板模拟消毒表面。研究不仅按照该标准进行,还使用了临床多重耐药微生物菌株。基于这些研究,可以得出结论,在消毒过程中(对数减少≥5)且接触时间最短(1分钟)的最有效产品是含有乙醇、丙醇和季铵化合物的产品(自制湿巾)以及丙醇(市售湿巾)。就制造商宣称的接触时间而言,最无效的产品(对数减少<5)是含有乙醇和次氯酸钠的产品(市售湿巾)。与市售湿巾相比,自制湿巾的抗菌活性要好得多。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63f4/8198427/34a28306b5c7/ijerph-18-05932-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63f4/8198427/537a8203fc97/ijerph-18-05932-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63f4/8198427/ceb25e761feb/ijerph-18-05932-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63f4/8198427/34a28306b5c7/ijerph-18-05932-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63f4/8198427/537a8203fc97/ijerph-18-05932-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63f4/8198427/ceb25e761feb/ijerph-18-05932-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63f4/8198427/34a28306b5c7/ijerph-18-05932-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Application of EN 16615 (4-Field Test) for the Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Activity of the Selected Commercial and Self-Made Disinfectant Wipes.应用EN 16615(四场试验)评估所选商用和自制消毒湿巾的抗菌活性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 31;18(11):5932. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115932.
2
Evaluation of the virucidal efficacy of disinfectant wipes with a test method simulating practical conditions.模拟实际情况的试验方法评估消毒湿巾的病毒杀灭效果。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2019 Jul 16;8:121. doi: 10.1186/s13756-019-0569-4. eCollection 2019.
3
Disinfectant wipes transfer Clostridioides difficile spores from contaminated surfaces to uncontaminated surfaces during the disinfection process.消毒湿巾在消毒过程中会将艰难梭菌孢子从污染表面转移到未污染表面。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2020 Nov 4;9(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s13756-020-00844-0.
4
Antimicrobial efficacy and compatibility of solid copper alloys with chemical disinfectants.固体铜合金与化学消毒剂的抗菌效果和相容性。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 10;13(8):e0200748. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200748. eCollection 2018.
5
Bactericidal Activity of Ready-To-Use Alcohol-Based Commercial Wipes According to EN 16615 Carrier Standard.根据 EN 16615 载体标准,即用型酒精商业湿巾的杀菌活性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 18;16(18):3475. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16183475.
6
Efficacy of disinfectant-impregnated wipes used for surface disinfection in hospitals: a review.消毒剂浸渍湿巾用于医院表面消毒的效果:综述。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2019 Aug 19;8:139. doi: 10.1186/s13756-019-0595-2. eCollection 2019.
7
Assessing the Contributions of Inactivation, Removal, and Transfer of Ebola Virus and Vesicular Stomatitis Virus by Disinfectant Pre-soaked Wipes.评估消毒湿巾对埃博拉病毒和水疱性口炎病毒灭活、清除和转移的作用。
Front Public Health. 2020 Jun 2;8:183. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00183. eCollection 2020.
8
Virucidal activity of a quaternary ammonium compound disinfectant against feline calicivirus: a surrogate for norovirus.一种季铵化合物消毒剂对猫杯状病毒的杀病毒活性:作为诺如病毒的替代物
Am J Infect Control. 2006 Jun;34(5):269-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2005.11.009.
9
Hydrogen peroxide and sodium hypochlorite disinfectants are more effective against and biofilms than quaternary ammonium compounds.过氧化氢和次氯酸钠消毒剂比季铵盐化合物更能有效对抗 和 生物膜。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2018 Dec 17;7:154. doi: 10.1186/s13756-018-0447-5. eCollection 2018.
10
Surface Disinfectants for Burn Units Evaluated by a New Double Method, Using Microorganisms Recently Isolated From Patients, on a Surface Germ-Carrier Model.采用一种新的双重方法,在表面细菌载体模型上,使用最近从患者身上分离出的微生物,对烧伤病房的表面消毒剂进行评估。
J Burn Care Res. 2017 May/Jun;38(3):e663-e669. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000450.

引用本文的文献

1
Compositional factors driving antibacterial efficacy in healthcare wet wipe products.推动医疗湿巾产品抗菌功效的成分因素。
Front Microbiol. 2025 Apr 28;16:1582630. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1582630. eCollection 2025.
2
Efficacy of Disinfectants for Monkeypox Virus Inactivation on High Touch Surface Materials in Low-Resource Settings.在资源有限的环境中,对高接触表面材料进行猴痘病毒消毒的效果。
Environ Sci Technol. 2024 Nov 12;58(45):19981-19989. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.4c09821. Epub 2024 Oct 31.
3
Contact time has limited impact on the efficacy of disinfectant towelettes when tested under conditions reflective of realistic use.

本文引用的文献

1
Synergistic effects of anionic surfactants on coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) virucidal efficiency of sanitizing fluids to fight COVID-19.阴离子表面活性剂对消毒液杀新冠病毒(SARS-CoV-2)效率的协同作用。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2020 Nov;145:111702. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2020.111702. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
2
Impact of surface disinfection with hydrogen peroxide on the prevalence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) in hospital wards.过氧化氢表面消毒对医院病房耐万古霉素肠球菌(VRE)流行率的影响。
GMS Hyg Infect Control. 2020 Jun 22;15:Doc13. doi: 10.3205/dgkh000348. eCollection 2020.
3
Test methods for surface disinfection: comparison of the Wiperator ASTM standard E2967-15 and the 4-field test EN 16615.
接触时间对符合实际使用情况的条件下测试的消毒湿巾的功效影响有限。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2023 Jul 16;12(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s13756-023-01266-4.
表面消毒测试方法:Wiperator ASTM标准E2967 - 15与四区域测试EN 16615的比较
GMS Hyg Infect Control. 2020 Apr 1;15:Doc04. doi: 10.3205/dgkh000339. eCollection 2020.
4
Bactericidal Activity of Ready-To-Use Alcohol-Based Commercial Wipes According to EN 16615 Carrier Standard.根据 EN 16615 载体标准,即用型酒精商业湿巾的杀菌活性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 18;16(18):3475. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16183475.
5
Efficacy of disinfectant-impregnated wipes used for surface disinfection in hospitals: a review.消毒剂浸渍湿巾用于医院表面消毒的效果:综述。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2019 Aug 19;8:139. doi: 10.1186/s13756-019-0595-2. eCollection 2019.
6
Evaluation of the virucidal efficacy of disinfectant wipes with a test method simulating practical conditions.模拟实际情况的试验方法评估消毒湿巾的病毒杀灭效果。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2019 Jul 16;8:121. doi: 10.1186/s13756-019-0569-4. eCollection 2019.
7
Interlaboratory reproducibility of a test method following 4-field test methodology to evaluate the susceptibility of Clostridium difficile spores.4 野测试方法评估艰难梭菌孢子易感性的测试方法的实验室间重现性
J Hosp Infect. 2019 Sep;103(1):78-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2019.04.011. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
8
Practical considerations for infection prevention of near-patient surfaces: validation of an alternative polyvinyl chloride carrier in the 4-field test EN 16615:2015.患者附近表面感染预防的实际考量:在4场试验EN 16615:2015中对一种替代聚氯乙烯载体的验证
J Hosp Infect. 2019 Sep;103(1):e118-e119. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2019.02.018. Epub 2019 Mar 2.
9
Impact of test protocols and material binding on the efficacy of antimicrobial wipes.测试方案和材料结合对消毒湿巾功效的影响。
J Hosp Infect. 2019 Sep;103(1):e25-e32. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2018.09.016. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
10
The Role of Environmental Contamination in the Transmission of Nosocomial Pathogens and Healthcare-Associated Infections.环境污染在医院病原体传播及医疗相关感染中的作用
Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2018 Apr 27;20(6):12. doi: 10.1007/s11908-018-0620-2.