• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心脏手术后不良事件的机器学习模型的开发与验证

Development and Validation of Machine Learning Models for Adverse Events after Cardiac Surgery.

作者信息

Jin Qingchu, Amal Saeed, Rabb Jaime B, Mazhude Felistas, Shivandi Venkatesh, Kramer Robert S, Sawyer Douglas B, Winslow Raimond L

机构信息

Roux Institute at Northeastern University, Portland ME, USA.

Those authors contribute equally.

出版信息

medRxiv. 2025 Feb 25:2025.02.24.25322811. doi: 10.1101/2025.02.24.25322811.

DOI:10.1101/2025.02.24.25322811
PMID:40061347
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11888533/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Early recognition of adverse events after cardiac surgery is vital for treatment. However, the widely used Society of Thoracic Surgery (STS) risk model has modest performance in predicting adverse events and only applies <80% of cardiac surgeries.

OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate machine learning (ML) models for predicting outcomes after cardiac surgery.

DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

ML models, referred as Roux-MMC model, were developed and validated using a retrospective cohort extracted from the STS Adult Cardiac Surgery Database (ACSD) at Maine Medical Center (MMC) between January 2012 to December 2021. It was further validated on a prospective cohort of MMC between January 2022 to February 2024. The performance of Roux-MMC model is compared with the STS model. cardiac surgery.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Postoperative outcomes: mortality, stroke, renal failure, reoperation, prolonged ventilation, major morbidity or mortality, prolonged length of stay (PLOS) and short length of stay (SLOS). Primary measure: area under the receiver-operating curve (AUROC).

RESULTS

A retrospective cohort of 9,841 patients (median [IQR] age, 67 [59-74] years; 7,127 [72%] males) and a prospective cohort of 2,305 patients (median [IQR] age, 67 [59-73] years; 1,707 [74%] males) were included. In the prospective cohort, the Roux-MMC model achieves performance for prolonged ventilation (AUROC 0.911 [95% CI, 0.887-0.935]), PLOS (AUROC 0.875 [95% CI, 0.848-0.898]), renal failure (AUROC 0.878 [95% CI, 0.829-0.921]), mortality (AUROC 0.882 [95% CI, 0.837-0.920]), reoperation (AUROC 0.824 [95% CI, 0.787-0.860]), SLOS (AUROC 0.818 [95% CI, 0.801-0.835]) and major morbidity or mortality (AUROC 0.859 [95% CI, 0.832-0.884]). The Roux-MMC model outperforms the STS model for all 8 outcomes, achieving 0.020-0.167 greater AUROC. The Roux-MMC model covers all cardiac surgery patients, while the STS model applies to only 65% in the retrospective and 77% in the prospective cohorts.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

We developed ML models to predict 8 postoperative outcomes on all cardiac surgery patients using preoperative and intraoperative variables. The Roux-MMC model outperforms the STS model in the prospective cohort. The Roux-MMC model is built on STS ACSD, a data system used in ~1000 US hospitals, thus, it has the potential to easily applied in other hospitals.

摘要

重要性

心脏手术后不良事件的早期识别对治疗至关重要。然而,广泛使用的胸外科医师协会(STS)风险模型在预测不良事件方面表现一般,且仅适用于不到80%的心脏手术。

目的

开发并验证用于预测心脏手术后结局的机器学习(ML)模型。

设计、设置和参与者:使用从缅因医疗中心(MMC)的STS成人心脏手术数据库(ACSD)中提取的回顾性队列,开发并验证了称为Roux-MMC模型的ML模型,时间跨度为2012年1月至2021年12月。在2022年1月至2024年2月MMC的前瞻性队列中对其进行了进一步验证。将Roux-MMC模型的性能与STS模型进行比较。心脏手术。

主要结局和指标

术后结局:死亡率、中风、肾衰竭、再次手术、通气时间延长、严重并发症或死亡、住院时间延长(PLOS)和住院时间缩短(SLOS)。主要指标:受试者操作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)。

结果

纳入了一个包含9841例患者的回顾性队列(年龄中位数[四分位间距],67[59 - 74]岁;7127例[72%]为男性)和一个包含2305例患者的前瞻性队列(年龄中位数[四分位间距],67[59 - 73]岁;1707例[74%]为男性)。在前瞻性队列中,Roux-MMC模型在通气时间延长(AUROC 0.911[95%置信区间,0.887 - 0.935])、住院时间延长(AUROC 0.875[95%置信区间,0.848 - 0.898])、肾衰竭(AUROC 0.878[95%置信区间,0.829 - 0.921])、死亡率(AUROC 0.882[95%置信区间,0.837 - 0.920])、再次手术(AUROC 0.824[95%置信区间,0.787 - 0.860])、住院时间缩短(AUROC 0.818[95%置信区间,0.801 - 0.835])和严重并发症或死亡(AUROC 0.859[95%置信区间,0.832 - 0.884])方面表现良好。Roux-MMC模型在所有8个结局方面均优于STS模型,AUROC高出0.020 - 0.167。Roux-MMC模型涵盖了所有心脏手术患者,而STS模型在回顾性队列中仅适用于65%的患者,在前瞻性队列中仅适用于77%的患者。

结论及相关性

我们开发了ML模型,使用术前和术中变量预测所有心脏手术患者的8种术后结局。Roux-MMC模型在前瞻性队列中优于STS模型。Roux-MMC模型基于STS ACSD构建,这是一个在美国约1000家医院使用的数据系统,因此,它有可能轻松应用于其他医院。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0044/11888533/be50344d5940/nihpp-2025.02.24.25322811v1-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0044/11888533/4f6e5dc6fb55/nihpp-2025.02.24.25322811v1-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0044/11888533/174cd0cd52ba/nihpp-2025.02.24.25322811v1-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0044/11888533/be50344d5940/nihpp-2025.02.24.25322811v1-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0044/11888533/4f6e5dc6fb55/nihpp-2025.02.24.25322811v1-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0044/11888533/174cd0cd52ba/nihpp-2025.02.24.25322811v1-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0044/11888533/be50344d5940/nihpp-2025.02.24.25322811v1-f0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and Validation of Machine Learning Models for Adverse Events after Cardiac Surgery.心脏手术后不良事件的机器学习模型的开发与验证
medRxiv. 2025 Feb 25:2025.02.24.25322811. doi: 10.1101/2025.02.24.25322811.
2
Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Model to Identify Patients Before Surgery at High Risk for Postoperative Adverse Events.开发和验证一种机器学习模型,以识别手术前术后不良事件风险较高的患者。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jul 3;6(7):e2322285. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.22285.
3
Developing a Machine Learning Model for Predicting 30-Day Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Events in Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery: Retrospective Study.开发用于预测非心脏手术患者30天主要不良心脑血管事件的机器学习模型:回顾性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 9;27:e66366. doi: 10.2196/66366.
4
Comparison of Machine Learning Models Including Preoperative, Intraoperative, and Postoperative Data and Mortality After Cardiac Surgery.机器学习模型的比较,包括术前、术中、术后数据与心脏手术后死亡率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Oct 3;5(10):e2237970. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.37970.
5
Development and Validation of an Explainable Machine Learning Model for Predicting Myocardial Injury After Noncardiac Surgery in Two Centers in China: Retrospective Study.中国两个中心用于预测非心脏手术后心肌损伤的可解释机器学习模型的开发与验证:一项回顾性研究
JMIR Aging. 2024 Jul 26;7:e54872. doi: 10.2196/54872.
6
Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Acute Kidney Injury Following Pediatric Cardiac Surgery: Model Development and Validation Study.基于机器学习的小儿心脏手术后急性肾损伤预测:模型开发与验证研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jan 5;25:e41142. doi: 10.2196/41142.
7
Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Early Complications Following Surgery for Intestinal Obstruction: Multicenter Retrospective Study.基于机器学习的肠梗阻手术后早期并发症预测:多中心回顾性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 3;27:e68354. doi: 10.2196/68354.
8
Performance of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 Cardiac Risk Models for Major Postoperative Complications after Heart Valve Surgery in a Chinese Population: A Multicenter Study.胸外科医师协会2008年心脏风险模型在中国人群心脏瓣膜手术后主要术后并发症中的表现:一项多中心研究
Heart Surg Forum. 2018 Jun 19;21(4):E281-E285. doi: 10.1532/hsf.1945.
9
A comparison of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the Society of Thoracic Surgery Cardiac Surgery preoperative risk models: a cohort study.国家手术质量改进计划与胸外科协会心脏手术术前风险模型的比较:队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2023 Aug 1;109(8):2334-2343. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000490.
10
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 2--isolated valve surgery.胸外科医师协会2008年心脏手术风险模型:第2部分——单纯瓣膜手术
Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Jul;88(1 Suppl):S23-42. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.05.056.

本文引用的文献

1
Global Cardiac Surgical Volume and Gaps: Trends, Targets, and Way Forward.全球心脏外科手术量与差距:趋势、目标及未来方向
Ann Thorac Surg Short Rep. 2023 Dec 9;2(2):320-324. doi: 10.1016/j.atssr.2023.11.019. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
TRIPOD+AI statement: updated guidance for reporting clinical prediction models that use regression or machine learning methods.TRIPOD+AI 声明:报告使用回归或机器学习方法的临床预测模型的更新指南。
BMJ. 2024 Apr 16;385:e078378. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-078378.
3
Predictors of short-term survival in cardiac valvular surgery patients with intra-aortic balloon pump implantation.
主动脉内球囊泵植入术治疗心脏瓣膜病患者短期生存率的预测因素。
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Jul;72(7):447-454. doi: 10.1007/s11748-023-01989-6. Epub 2023 Dec 1.
4
Machine learning using institution-specific multi-modal electronic health records improves mortality risk prediction for cardiac surgery patients.利用机构特定的多模态电子健康记录进行机器学习,可改善心脏手术患者的死亡风险预测。
JTCVS Open. 2023 Apr 5;14:214-251. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2023.03.010. eCollection 2023 Jun.
5
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for cardiogenic shock: a meta-analysis of mortality and complications.体外膜肺氧合治疗心源性休克:死亡率和并发症的荟萃分析
Ann Intensive Care. 2022 Oct 5;12(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s13613-022-01067-9.
6
Computational signatures for post-cardiac arrest trajectory prediction: Importance of early physiological time series.计算心脏停搏后轨迹预测的特征:早期生理时间序列的重要性。
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2022 Feb;41(1):101015. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2021.101015. Epub 2021 Dec 27.
7
Prediction of operative mortality for patients undergoing cardiac surgical procedures without established risk scores.预测未建立风险评分的心脏手术患者的手术死亡率。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 Apr;165(4):1449-1459.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.09.010. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
8
Failure to Rescue: A New Society of Thoracic Surgeons Quality Metric for Cardiac Surgery.未能抢救成功:胸外科医生新的心脏手术质量度量标准。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2022 Jun;113(6):1935-1942. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.06.025. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
9
Toward Dynamic Risk Prediction of Outcomes After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft: Improving Risk Prediction With Intraoperative Events Using Gradient Boosting.基于术中事件的梯度提升算法实现冠状动脉旁路移植术后结局的动态风险预测:改善风险预测。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2021 Jun;14(6):e007363. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.007363. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
10
The use of blood and blood products in aortic surgery is associated with adverse outcomes.在主动脉手术中使用血液及血液制品与不良后果相关。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 Feb;165(2):544-551.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.02.096. Epub 2021 Mar 15.