Avila Francisco R, McLeod Christopher J, Huayllani Maria T, Boczar Daniel, Giardi Davide, Bruce Charles J, Carter Rickey E, Forte Antonio J
Division of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
Pain Pract. 2021 Nov;21(8):955-965. doi: 10.1111/papr.13047. Epub 2021 Jun 26.
Wearable electronic devices are a convenient solution to pain intensity assessment as they can provide continuous monitoring for more precise medication adjustments. However, there is little evidence regarding the use of wearable electronic devices for chronic pain intensity assessment. Our primary objective was to examine the physiologic parameters used by wearable electronic devices for chronic pain intensity assessment. We initially inquired PubMed, CINAHL, and Embase for studies evaluating the use of wearable electronic devices for chronic pain intensity assessment. We updated our inquiry by searching on PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar. English peer-reviewed studies were included, with no exclusions based on time frame or publication status. Of 348 articles that were identified on the first inquiry, 8 fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Of 179 articles that were identified on the last inquiry, only 1 fulfilled the eligibility criteria. We found articles evaluating wristbands, smartwatches, and belts. Parameters evaluated were psychomotor and sleep patterns, space and time mobility, heart rate variability, and skeletal muscle electrical activity. Most of the studies found significant positive associations between physiological parameters measured by wearable electronic devices and self-reporting pain scales. Wearable electronic devices reliably reflect physiologic or biometric parameters, providing a physiological correlation for pain. Early stage investigation suggests that the degree of pain intensity can be discerned, which ideally will reduce the bias inherent to existing numeric/verbal scales. Further research on the use of these devices is vital.
可穿戴电子设备是疼痛强度评估的便捷解决方案,因为它们可以提供持续监测,以便进行更精确的药物调整。然而,关于使用可穿戴电子设备进行慢性疼痛强度评估的证据很少。我们的主要目标是研究可穿戴电子设备用于慢性疼痛强度评估所使用的生理参数。我们最初在PubMed、CINAHL和Embase上查询了评估可穿戴电子设备用于慢性疼痛强度评估的研究。我们通过在PubMed、Embase、Scopus和谷歌学术上搜索来更新我们的查询。纳入了英文同行评审研究,不基于时间框架或出版状态进行排除。在第一次查询中识别出的348篇文章中,有8篇符合纳入标准。在最后一次查询中识别出的179篇文章中,只有1篇符合纳入标准。我们发现了评估腕带、智能手表和腰带的文章。评估的参数包括心理运动和睡眠模式、空间和时间移动性、心率变异性以及骨骼肌电活动。大多数研究发现,可穿戴电子设备测量的生理参数与自我报告疼痛量表之间存在显著的正相关。可穿戴电子设备可靠地反映生理或生物特征参数,为疼痛提供生理相关性。早期研究表明,可以辨别疼痛强度的程度,理想情况下这将减少现有数字/文字量表固有的偏差。对这些设备使用的进一步研究至关重要。