Suppr超能文献

确定最佳男性临界值:对西班牙大学生代表性样本中的饮食失调检查问卷(EDE-Q)进行验证性因素分析。

Establishing the optimal male cut-off point: confirmatory factor analysis of the eating disorder examination-questionnaire (EDE-Q) in a representative sample of Spanish university students.

作者信息

Rica Robin, Solar María, Compte Emilio J, Sepúlveda Ana R

机构信息

Faculty of Psychology. Department of Biological and Health Psychology, School of Psychology, Autonomous University of Madrid (UAM), Madrid, Spain.

Eating Behavior Research Center School of Psychology, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago, Chile.

出版信息

Eat Weight Disord. 2022 Apr;27(3):969-977. doi: 10.1007/s40519-021-01234-0. Epub 2021 Jun 5.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Although the EDE-Q is derived from the "gold standard" for the assessment of eating disorders (ED), its factor structure is controversial, particularly in male samples. The aim of the study was to examine the psychometric properties and factor structure of the EDE-Q, as well as to establish a sensitive and specific cut-off point validated by EDE clinical interview.

METHODS

A series of Confirmatory Factor Analyses were performed among a representative sample of 796 male university students, of whom 139 were interviewed. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated by receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to determinate the most appropriate cut-off value.

RESULTS

The original factor structure was not confirmed, showing a better fit with a 2-factor solution. For the Spanish male sample, a cut-off ≥ 1.09 for at-risk of ED cases and ≥ 2.41 for clinical cases presents an optimal balance between sensitivity and specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

The establishment of specific cut-off points for males may help to reduce the under-diagnosis of ED in this population.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III: evidence obtained from well-designed case-control study.

摘要

目的

尽管饮食失调评定量表问卷版(EDE-Q)源自饮食失调(ED)评估的“金标准”,但其因子结构存在争议,在男性样本中尤为如此。本研究旨在检验EDE-Q的心理测量特性和因子结构,并确定经EDE临床访谈验证的敏感且特异的临界值。

方法

对796名男大学生的代表性样本进行了一系列验证性因子分析,其中139人接受了访谈。通过接受者操作特征(ROC)分析计算敏感性和特异性,以确定最合适的临界值。

结果

未证实原始因子结构,2因子模型拟合效果更佳。对于西班牙男性样本,ED风险病例的临界值≥1.09,临床病例的临界值≥2.41时,敏感性和特异性达到最佳平衡。

结论

为男性设定特定的临界值可能有助于减少该人群中ED的漏诊。

证据水平

III:从设计良好的病例对照研究中获得的证据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验