• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于水杨酸盐和硅酸钙的根管封闭剂对原代人牙周膜成纤维细胞的细胞毒性和遗传毒性

Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of salicylate- and calcium silicate-based root canal sealers on primer human periodontal ligament fibroblasts.

作者信息

Erdogan Hilal, Yildirim Sibel, Cobankara Funda Kont

机构信息

Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Nevsehir Haci Bektas Veli University, Nevsehir, Turkey.

Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey.

出版信息

Aust Endod J. 2021 Dec;47(3):645-653. doi: 10.1111/aej.12537. Epub 2021 Jun 7.

DOI:10.1111/aej.12537
PMID:34097343
Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the biocompatibility of epoxy-resin-based AHPlus, salicylate-based MTA-Fillapex and calcium silicate-based iRootSP root canal sealers. Cytotoxicity was assessed by XTT test. The extracts from sealers of different setting times were serially diluted. Cell viability was calculated as the percentage of the control group (100%). The optimal concentration of each sealer was used at genotoxicity test, and micronuclei formations were detected. Statistical analyses were done by using Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn post hoc test with Bonferroni correction. AHPlus and MTA-Fillapex showed the lowest percentage of cell viability at higher concentrations (1:1, 1:2, 1:4), especially at first 12 h. iRootSP showed higher viability at all concentrations and times than AHPlus and MTA-Fillapex. At genotoxicity assay, AHPlus increased the number of micronuclei. MTA-Fillapex slightly induced micronucleus formation (not significant) and iRootSP was not increased. In conclusion, calcium silicate-based iRootSP had lowest cytotoxic and genotoxic potential and can be considered as a highly biocompatible material.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估基于环氧树脂的AHPlus、基于水杨酸盐的MTA-Fillapex和基于硅酸钙的iRootSP根管封闭剂的生物相容性。通过XTT试验评估细胞毒性。对不同凝固时间的封闭剂提取物进行系列稀释。细胞活力以对照组(100%)的百分比计算。每种封闭剂的最佳浓度用于遗传毒性试验,并检测微核形成情况。采用Kruskal-Wallis检验和Dunn事后检验并进行Bonferroni校正进行统计分析。AHPlus和MTA-Fillapex在较高浓度(1:1、1:2、1:4)下细胞活力百分比最低,尤其是在最初12小时。iRootSP在所有浓度和时间下的活力均高于AHPlus和MTA-Fillapex。在遗传毒性试验中,AHPlus增加了微核数量。MTA-Fillapex轻微诱导微核形成(无显著性),而iRootSP未增加。总之,基于硅酸钙的iRootSP具有最低的细胞毒性和遗传毒性潜力,可被视为一种高度生物相容性材料。

相似文献

1
Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of salicylate- and calcium silicate-based root canal sealers on primer human periodontal ligament fibroblasts.基于水杨酸盐和硅酸钙的根管封闭剂对原代人牙周膜成纤维细胞的细胞毒性和遗传毒性
Aust Endod J. 2021 Dec;47(3):645-653. doi: 10.1111/aej.12537. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
2
Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of root canal sealers based on mineral trioxide aggregate.基于三氧化矿物凝聚体的根管封闭剂的细胞毒性和遗传毒性。
J Endod. 2012 Apr;38(4):495-500. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.11.003. Epub 2011 Dec 23.
3
Evaluation of the biocompatibility of root canal sealers on human periodontal ligament cells ex vivo.评价根管封闭剂对人牙周膜细胞的体外生物相容性。
Odontology. 2019 Jan;107(1):54-63. doi: 10.1007/s10266-018-0380-3. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
4
In vitro biocompatibility, inflammatory response, and osteogenic potential of 4 root canal sealers: Sealapex, Sankin apatite root sealer, MTA Fillapex, and iRoot SP root canal sealer.4种根管封闭剂的体外生物相容性、炎症反应和成骨潜力:Sealapex、三金磷灰石根管封闭剂、MTA Fillapex和iRoot SP根管封闭剂
J Endod. 2014 Oct;40(10):1642-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.04.006. Epub 2014 Jun 7.
5
Evaluation of cytocompatibility of calcium silicate-based endodontic sealers and their effects on the biological responses of mesenchymal dental stem cells.硅酸钙基根管封闭剂的细胞相容性及其对间充质牙干细胞生物学反应的影响评估。
Int Endod J. 2017 Jan;50(1):67-76. doi: 10.1111/iej.12596. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
6
Comparative Evaluation of Cytotoxicity of Root Canal Sealers on Cultured Human Periodontal Fibroblasts: In vitro Study.根管封闭剂对培养的人牙周膜成纤维细胞细胞毒性的比较评价:体外研究
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018 Jul 1;19(7):847-852.
7
Genotoxicity and Cytotoxicity Comparison of Calcium Silicate-Based and Resin-Based Sealers on Human Periodontal Ligament Stem Cells.基于硅酸钙和树脂基封闭剂对人牙周膜干细胞的遗传毒性和细胞毒性比较。
Eur Endod J. 2022 Jun;7(2):129-134. doi: 10.14744/eej.2022.09326.
8
DNA double-strand breaks caused by new and contemporary endodontic sealers.新型及当代根管封闭剂导致的DNA双链断裂
Int Endod J. 2016 Dec;49(12):1141-1151. doi: 10.1111/iej.12577. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
9
A Comparative Chemical Study of Calcium Silicate-Containing and Epoxy Resin-Based Root Canal Sealers.含钙硅酸根和环氧树脂基根管封闭剂的比较化学研究。
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:9808432. doi: 10.1155/2016/9808432. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
10
In vitro cytotoxicity of calcium silicate-containing endodontic sealers.含硅酸钙的根管封闭剂的体外细胞毒性
J Endod. 2015 Jan;41(1):56-61. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.09.012. Epub 2014 Oct 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of osteoconductivity and inflammatory response of a resin-based and a resin-free calcium silicate sealer: an in vivo study.基于树脂和无树脂硅酸钙封闭剂的骨传导性及炎症反应评估:一项体内研究
Clin Oral Investig. 2025 Jun 5;29(6):334. doi: 10.1007/s00784-025-06417-y.
2
Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity evaluation of AH Plus, Well-Root ST, and AH Plus Bioceramic Sealer.AH Plus、Well-Root ST和AH Plus生物陶瓷封闭剂的细胞毒性和遗传毒性评估。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 May 31;25(1):867. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06231-8.
3
Microstructural and Elemental Characterization of Calcium Silicate-Based Sealers.
硅酸钙基封闭剂的微观结构与元素表征
Nanomaterials (Basel). 2025 May 18;15(10):756. doi: 10.3390/nano15100756.
4
Evaluation of the Genotoxicity and Cytotoxicity of Bioceramic Endodontic Sealers in HepG2 and V79 Cell Lines: An In Vitro Study Using the Comet and Micronucleus Assays.生物陶瓷根管封闭剂在HepG2和V79细胞系中的遗传毒性和细胞毒性评估:使用彗星试验和微核试验的体外研究
J Funct Biomater. 2025 May 9;16(5):169. doi: 10.3390/jfb16050169.
5
Impact of various endodontic sealers on HPDLF Cell viability and apoptosis.各种根管封闭剂对 HPDLF 细胞活力和凋亡的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 8;14(1):27270. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-78344-z.
6
Cytotoxicity, Biocompatibility, and Calcium Deposition Capacity of 45S5 Bioglass Experimental Paste and Bio-C Temp: In Vitro and In Vivo Study Using Wistar Rats.45S5生物玻璃实验糊剂和Bio-C Temp的细胞毒性、生物相容性及钙沉积能力:使用Wistar大鼠的体外和体内研究
J Funct Biomater. 2024 Jul 4;15(7):184. doi: 10.3390/jfb15070184.
7
Premixed calcium silicate-based root canal sealers have better biological properties than AH Plus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vivo animal studies and laboratory studies.预混硅酸钙基根管封闭剂比AH Plus具有更好的生物学性能:一项对体内动物研究和实验室研究的系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024 Apr;27(4):345-359. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_24_24. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
8
Oxidative damage analysis and cell viability of Drosophila melanogaster exposed to three different endodontic sealers: an in vivo and ex vivo study.体内和体外研究:三种不同根管封闭剂处理下黑腹果蝇的氧化损伤分析和细胞活力。
Odontology. 2024 Oct;112(4):1178-1185. doi: 10.1007/s10266-024-00925-1. Epub 2024 Mar 17.
9
Genotoxicity induced by endodontic sealers: A systematic review.牙髓封闭剂引起的遗传毒性:一项系统评价。
Saudi Dent J. 2024 Feb;36(2):249-257. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.11.019. Epub 2023 Nov 17.
10
Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of bioceramic root canal sealers compared to conventional resin-based sealer.与传统树脂基根管封闭剂相比,生物陶瓷根管封闭剂的细胞毒性和遗传毒性
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 19;14(1):4124. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-54726-1.