• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

网络成员在共同创造过程中的合作模式。

Cooperation patterns of members in networks during co-creation.

机构信息

Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 153-8902, Japan.

Research Fellowship for Young Scientists (DC2), Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), Tokyo, 102-0083, Japan.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 8;11(1):11588. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90974-1.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-90974-1
PMID:34103540
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8187372/
Abstract

Cooperation (i.e., co-creation) has become the principal way of carrying out creative activities in modern society. In co-creation, different participants can play two completely different roles based on two different behaviours: some participants are the originators who generate initial contents, while others are the revisors who provide revisions or coordination. In this study, we investigated different participants' roles (i.e., the originator vs. the revisor) in co-creation and how these roles affected the final cooperation-group outcome. By using cooperation networks to represent cooperative relationships among participants, we found that peripheral members (i.e., those in the periphery of the cooperation networks) and core members (i.e., those in the centre of the cooperation networks) played the roles of originators and revisors, respectively, mainly affecting the quantity versus the quality of their creative outcomes. These results were robust across the three different datasets and the three different indicators defining core and peripheral members. Previous studies have considered cooperation behaviours to be homogeneous, ignoring that different participants may play different roles in co-creation. This study discusses patterns of cooperation among participants based on a model in which different roles in co-creation are considered. Thus, this research advances the understanding of how co-creation occurs in networks.

摘要

合作(即共同创造)已成为现代社会开展创造性活动的主要方式。在共同创造中,不同的参与者可以根据两种不同的行为扮演两种完全不同的角色:一些参与者是创作者,他们生成初始内容,而另一些参与者是修订者,他们提供修订或协调。在这项研究中,我们研究了共同创造中不同参与者的角色(即创作者与修订者),以及这些角色如何影响最终的合作群体成果。通过使用合作网络来表示参与者之间的合作关系,我们发现边缘成员(即合作网络边缘的成员)和核心成员(即合作网络中心的成员)分别扮演创作者和修订者的角色,主要影响他们的创意成果的数量和质量。这些结果在三个不同的数据集和三个不同的定义核心和边缘成员的指标中都是稳健的。以前的研究认为合作行为是同质的,忽略了不同的参与者在共同创造中可能扮演不同的角色。本研究基于考虑共同创造中不同角色的模型,讨论了参与者之间的合作模式。因此,这项研究增进了对网络中共同创造如何发生的理解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7c1/8187372/3febf14e324a/41598_2021_90974_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7c1/8187372/015b3e62eef2/41598_2021_90974_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7c1/8187372/b379496686e3/41598_2021_90974_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7c1/8187372/ac68a953794a/41598_2021_90974_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7c1/8187372/3febf14e324a/41598_2021_90974_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7c1/8187372/015b3e62eef2/41598_2021_90974_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7c1/8187372/b379496686e3/41598_2021_90974_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7c1/8187372/ac68a953794a/41598_2021_90974_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7c1/8187372/3febf14e324a/41598_2021_90974_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Cooperation patterns of members in networks during co-creation.网络成员在共同创造过程中的合作模式。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 8;11(1):11588. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90974-1.
2
Cooperation makes two less-creative individuals turn into a highly-creative pair.合作使两个创造力较低的个体变成一对极具创造力的搭档。
Neuroimage. 2018 May 15;172:527-537. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.02.007. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
3
A picture's worth a thousand words: engaging youth in CBPR using the creative arts.一图胜千言:利用创意艺术让青年参与社区参与式研究(CBPR)。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2009 Winter;3(4):349-58. doi: 10.1353/cpr.0.0090.
4
Cooperation Makes a Group be More Creative.合作使团队更有创造力。
Cereb Cortex. 2019 Jul 22;29(8):3457-3470. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhy215.
5
Cooperation, Trust, and Antagonism: How Public Goods Are Promoted.合作、信任与对抗:公共物品如何得到促进。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2013 Dec;14(3):119-65. doi: 10.1177/1529100612474436.
6
Reputations for treatment of outgroup members can prevent the emergence of political segregation in cooperative networks.群体外成员的治疗声誉可以防止合作网络中出现政治隔离。
Nat Commun. 2023 Nov 24;14(1):7721. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-43486-7.
7
Creative utterances about person-centered care among future health care professionals are related to reward dependence rather than to a creative personality profile.未来医疗保健专业人员中关于以患者为中心的护理的创造性言论与奖励依赖有关,而非与创造性人格特征有关。
Heliyon. 2019 Mar 22;5(3):e01389. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01389. eCollection 2019 Mar.
8
Sparse cliques trump scale-free networks in coordination and competition.稀疏聚类在协调和竞争中胜过无标度网络。
Sci Rep. 2016 Feb 22;6:21870. doi: 10.1038/srep21870.
9
Introducing the Practice Dive Approach: an extension of co-creation in physical activity promotion and health promotion.引入实践潜水方法:在身体活动促进和健康促进中的共同创造的延伸。
Health Promot Int. 2021 Dec 13;36(Supplement_2):ii53-ii64. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daab160.
10
Real-life creative problem solving in teams: fNIRS based hyperscanning study.团队现实生活中的创造性问题解决:基于功能近红外光谱的超扫描研究。
Neuroimage. 2019 Dec;203:116161. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116161. Epub 2019 Sep 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of the quality and diversity of reference products on creative activities in online communities.参考产品的质量和多样性对在线社区创造性活动的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 11;14(1):15316. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65124-y.
2
Prioritizing sustainable development goals in China based on a comprehensive assessment accounting for indicator interlinkages.基于考虑指标相互联系的综合评估对中国的可持续发展目标进行优先排序。
Heliyon. 2023 Nov 23;9(12):e22751. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22751. eCollection 2023 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Innovations are disproportionately likely in the periphery of a scientific network.创新在科学网络的边缘更有可能出现,且比例失调。
Theory Biosci. 2021 Nov;140(4):391-399. doi: 10.1007/s12064-021-00359-1. Epub 2021 Nov 12.
2
Evolutionary dynamics of higher-order interactions in social networks.社会网络中高阶相互作用的进化动态。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 May;5(5):586-595. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-01024-1. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
3
Anomalous structure and dynamics in news diffusion among heterogeneous individuals.异质个体间新闻扩散中的异常结构和动态。
Nat Hum Behav. 2019 Jul;3(7):709-718. doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0605-7. Epub 2019 May 20.
4
Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology.大团队推动科学技术发展,小团队则颠覆之。
Nature. 2019 Feb;566(7744):378-382. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-0941-9. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
5
The Wisdom of Networks: A General Adaptation and Learning Mechanism of Complex Systems: The Network Core Triggers Fast Responses to Known Stimuli; Innovations Require the Slow Network Periphery and Are Encoded by Core-Remodeling.网络智慧:复杂系统的通用适应和学习机制:网络核心触发对已知刺激的快速反应;创新需要缓慢的网络外围,并且由核心重塑进行编码。
Bioessays. 2018 Jan;40(1). doi: 10.1002/bies.201700150. Epub 2017 Nov 23.
6
Quantifying the impact of weak, strong, and super ties in scientific careers.量化弱关系、强关系和超级关系在科学职业生涯中的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Aug 25;112(34):E4671-80. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1501444112. Epub 2015 Aug 10.
7
Profiling core-periphery network structure by random walkers.通过随机游走者剖析核心-外围网络结构。
Sci Rep. 2013;3:1467. doi: 10.1038/srep01467.
8
Restricted connections among distinguished players support cooperation.杰出参与者之间的受限联系促进合作。
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2008 Dec;78(6 Pt 2):066101. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.78.066101. Epub 2008 Dec 1.
9
Social diversity and promotion of cooperation in the spatial prisoner's dilemma game.空间囚徒困境博弈中的社会多样性与合作促进
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2008 Jan;77(1 Pt 1):011904. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.77.011904. Epub 2008 Jan 14.
10
The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge.团队在知识生产中日益占据主导地位。
Science. 2007 May 18;316(5827):1036-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1136099. Epub 2007 Apr 12.