• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用三种封闭剂进行单尖充填的微计算机断层扫描评估

Micro-computed tomographic evaluation of single-cone obturation with three sealers.

作者信息

Zare Sahar, Shen Ivy, Zhu Qiang, Ahn Chul, Primus Carolyn, Komabayashi Takashi

机构信息

University of New England College of Dental Medicine, Portland, ME, USA.

Division of Endodontology, University of Connecticut School of Dental Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA.

出版信息

Restor Dent Endod. 2021 Apr 16;46(2):e25. doi: 10.5395/rde.2021.46.e25. eCollection 2021 May.

DOI:10.5395/rde.2021.46.e25
PMID:34123761
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8170377/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study used micro-computed tomography (µCT) to compare voids and interfaces in single-cone obturation among AH Plus, EndoSequence BC, and prototype surface pre-reacted glass ionomer (S-PRG) sealers and to determine the percentage of sealer contact at the dentin and gutta-percha (GP) interfaces.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifteen single-rooted human teeth were shaped using ProTaper NEXT size X5 rotary files using 2.5% NaOCl irrigation. Roots were obturated with a single-cone ProTaper NEXT GP point X5 with AH Plus, EndoSequence BC, or prototype S-PRG sealer ( = 5/group).

RESULTS

The volumes of GP, sealer, and voids were measured in the region of 0-2, 2-4, 4-6, and 6-8 mm from the apex, using image analysis of sagittal µCT scans. GP volume percentages were: AH Plus (75.5%), EndoSequence BC (87.3%), and prototype S-PRG (94.4%). Sealer volume percentages were less: AH Plus (14.3%), EndoSequence BC (6.8%), and prototype S-PRG (4.6%). Void percentages were AH Plus (10.1%), EndoSequence BC (5.9%), and prototype S-PRG (1.0%). Dentin-sealer contact ratios of AH Plus, EndoSequence BC, and prototype S-PRG groups were 82.4% ± 6.8%, 71.6% ± 25.3%, and 70.2% ± 9.4%, respectively. GP-sealer contact ratios of AH Plus, EndoSequence BC, and prototype S-PRG groups were 65.6% ± 29.1%, 80.7% ± 25.8%, and 87.0% ± 8.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Prototype S-PRG sealer created a low-void obturation, similar to EndoSequence BC sealer with similar dentin-sealer contact (> 70%) and GP-sealer contact (> 80%). Prototype S-PRG sealer presented comparable filling quality to EndoSequence BC sealer.

摘要

目的

本研究使用微型计算机断层扫描(µCT)比较AH Plus、EndoSequence BC和原型表面预反应玻璃离子(S-PRG)封闭剂在单锥充填中的空隙和界面,并确定封闭剂在牙本质和牙胶(GP)界面处的接触百分比。

材料与方法

使用ProTaper NEXT X5旋转锉对15颗单根人牙进行预备,并用2.5%次氯酸钠冲洗。用单锥ProTaper NEXT GP尖X5分别与AH Plus、EndoSequence BC或原型S-PRG封闭剂对牙根进行充填(每组n = 5)。

结果

使用矢状面µCT扫描的图像分析,在根尖0-2、2-4、4-6和6-8 mm区域测量GP、封闭剂和空隙的体积。GP体积百分比分别为:AH Plus(75.5%)、EndoSequence BC(87.3%)和原型S-PRG(94.4%)。封闭剂体积百分比更低:AH Plus(14.3%)、EndoSequence BC(6.8%)和原型S-PRG(4.6%)。空隙百分比分别为AH Plus(10.1%)、EndoSequence BC(5.9%)和原型S-PRG(1.0%)。AH Plus、EndoSequence BC和原型S-PRG组的牙本质-封闭剂接触率分别为82.4%±6.8%、71.6%±25.3%和70.2%±9.4%。AH Plus、EndoSequence BC和原型S-PRG组的GP-封闭剂接触率分别为65.6%±29.1%、80.7%±25.8%和87.0%±8.6%。

结论

原型S-PRG封闭剂形成了低空隙充填,类似于EndoSequence BC封闭剂,具有相似的牙本质-封闭剂接触(>70%)和GP-封闭剂接触(>80%)。原型S-PRG封闭剂的充填质量与EndoSequence BC封闭剂相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bed/8170377/ad4827e9eeae/rde-46-e25-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bed/8170377/b44c3205d195/rde-46-e25-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bed/8170377/ca935128b6f0/rde-46-e25-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bed/8170377/e4c2bcd64515/rde-46-e25-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bed/8170377/ad4827e9eeae/rde-46-e25-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bed/8170377/b44c3205d195/rde-46-e25-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bed/8170377/ca935128b6f0/rde-46-e25-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bed/8170377/e4c2bcd64515/rde-46-e25-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bed/8170377/ad4827e9eeae/rde-46-e25-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Micro-computed tomographic evaluation of single-cone obturation with three sealers.使用三种封闭剂进行单尖充填的微计算机断层扫描评估
Restor Dent Endod. 2021 Apr 16;46(2):e25. doi: 10.5395/rde.2021.46.e25. eCollection 2021 May.
2
Ion Release From Prototype Surface Pre-Reacted Glass Ionomer (S-PRG) Sealer and EndoSequence BC Sealer.原型表面预反应玻璃离聚物(S-PRG)封闭剂和 EndoSequence BC 封闭剂的离子释放。
Eur Endod J. 2021 Apr;6(1):122-127. doi: 10.14744/eej.2020.50470. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
3
Use of micro-CT to examine effects of heat on coronal obturation.使用 micro-CT 检查热对根管封闭的影响。
J Oral Sci. 2022 Jul 1;64(3):224-227. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.22-0013. Epub 2022 Jun 4.
4
Micro-CT assessment of gap-containing areas along the gutta-percha-sealer interface in oval-shaped canals.微 CT 评估沿椭圆形根管牙胶-封闭剂界面含间隙区域。
Int Endod J. 2022 Jul;55(7):795-807. doi: 10.1111/iej.13744. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
5
Retreatability of two endodontic sealers, EndoSequence BC Sealer and AH Plus: a micro-computed tomographic comparison.两种根管封闭剂EndoSequence BC封闭剂和AH Plus的可再治疗性:显微计算机断层扫描比较
Restor Dent Endod. 2017 Feb;42(1):19-26. doi: 10.5395/rde.2017.42.1.19. Epub 2016 Dec 8.
6
Coronal and apical leakage among five endodontic sealers.五种根管封闭剂的冠向和根尖向渗漏。
J Oral Sci. 2022 Jan 19;64(1):95-98. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.21-0433. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
7
Push-Out Bond Strength, Characterization, and Ion Release of Premixed and Powder-Liquid Bioceramic Sealers with or without Gutta-Percha.推出力粘结强度、特性、混合和粉液型生物陶瓷封闭剂与牙胶联合或不联合的离子释放。
Scanning. 2021 May 6;2021:6617930. doi: 10.1155/2021/6617930. eCollection 2021.
8
Micro-CT determination of the porosity of two tricalcium silicate sealers applied using three obturation techniques.采用三种根管充填技术对两种硅酸三钙类根管封闭剂的孔隙率进行微 CT 测定。
J Oral Sci. 2024;66(3):163-168. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.24-0031.
9
The effect of nonthermal plasma on the push-out bond strength of two different root canal sealers.非热等离子体对两种不同根管封闭剂推出粘结强度的影响。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2020 Jun;23(6):811-816. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_578_19.
10
Micro CT pilot evaluation of removability of two endodontic sealers.微 CT 初步评价两种根管封闭剂的可去除性。
J Oral Sci. 2021 Oct 1;63(4):306-309. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.21-0196. Epub 2021 Aug 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative evaluation of bioactive calcium silicate coating on functionalized gutta-percha and its effect on bioceramic sealer wettability - An study.功能化牙胶尖上生物活性硅酸钙涂层的比较评估及其对生物陶瓷封闭剂润湿性的影响——一项研究
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2025 Jul;28(7):613-618. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_159_25. Epub 2025 Jul 2.
2
Assessment of gap areas of root filling techniques in teeth with 3D-printed different configurations of C-shaped root canals: a micro-computed tomography study.使用3D打印的不同形态C形根管对牙齿根管充填技术的间隙区域进行评估:一项显微计算机断层扫描研究
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Feb 13;25(1):237. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05608-z.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Comprehensive review of current endodontic sealers.当前根管封闭剂的综合评述。
Dent Mater J. 2020 Sep 29;39(5):703-720. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2019-288. Epub 2020 Mar 24.
2
Comparative biological assessments of endodontic root canal sealer containing surface pre-reacted glass-ionomer (S-PRG) filler or silica filler.含表面预反应玻璃离子(S-PRG)填料或硅填料的根管封闭剂的比较生物学评估。
Dent Mater J. 2020 Mar 31;39(2):287-294. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2019-029. Epub 2019 Nov 28.
3
Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of marginal adaptation of AH-Plus, GuttaFlow, and RealSeal at apical one-third of root canals - Part II: Core-sealer interface.
Ex-vivo evaluation of clinically-set hydraulic sealers used with different canal dryness protocols and obturation techniques: a randomized clinical trial.
临床设定的液压密封剂与不同根管干燥方案和封闭技术联合使用的离体评估:一项随机临床试验。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Oct 27;28(11):612. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-06006-5.
4
Hydraulic (Single Cone) Versus Thermogenic (Warm Vertical Compaction) Obturation Techniques: A Systematic Review.液压(单锥)与产热(热垂直压实)根管充填技术:一项系统评价。
Cureus. 2024 Jun 22;16(6):e62925. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62925. eCollection 2024 Jun.
5
Assessment of isthmus filling using two obturation techniques performed by students with different levels of clinical experience.使用两种充填技术对不同临床经验水平的学生进行峡部充填情况评估。
J Dent Sci. 2024 Jan;19(1):169-176. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2023.05.010. Epub 2023 May 22.
6
Enhancing Coronal Adaptation of Root Canal Fillings with a Modified Single-Cone Obturation Technique: Two Case Reports.采用改良单锥充填技术增强根管充填物的冠部适应性:两例病例报告
Iran Endod J. 2024;19(1):50-55. doi: 10.22037/iej.v19i1.43991.
7
Efficacy of Reciprocating Instruments in Retreatment of Bioactive and Resin-Based Root Canal Sealers.往复式器械在再治疗生物活性和树脂类根管封闭剂中的疗效。
Acta Stomatol Croat. 2022 Dec;56(4):338-350. doi: 10.15644/asc56/4/1.
8
Calcium-doped zinc oxide nanocrystals as an innovative intracanal medicament: a pilot study.钙掺杂氧化锌纳米晶体作为一种新型根管内药物:一项初步研究。
Restor Dent Endod. 2022 Oct 4;47(4):e38. doi: 10.5395/rde.2022.47.e38. eCollection 2022 Nov.
根管根尖三分之一处AH-Plus、GuttaFlow和RealSeal边缘适应性的扫描电子显微镜评估 - 第二部分:根管封闭剂与牙胶尖界面
J Conserv Dent. 2018 Jan-Feb;21(1):90-94. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_127_17.
4
Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of marginal adaptation of AH-plus, GuttaFlow, and RealSeal at apical one-third of root canals - Part I: Dentin-sealer interface.根管根尖三分之一处AH-plus、GuttaFlow和RealSeal边缘适应性的扫描电子显微镜评估 - 第一部分:牙本质封闭剂界面
J Conserv Dent. 2018 Jan-Feb;21(1):85-89. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_126_17.
5
Clinical Outcome of Non-Surgical Root Canal Treatment Using a Single-cone Technique with Endosequence Bioceramic Sealer: A Retrospective Analysis.采用单尖技术联合 Endosequence 生物陶瓷根管封闭剂的非手术根管治疗的临床疗效:回顾性分析。
J Endod. 2018 Jun;44(6):941-945. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2018.02.019. Epub 2018 Mar 29.
6
Evaluation of the interface between gutta-percha and two types of sealers using scanning electron microscopy (SEM).采用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)评价两种不同类型牙胶与根管壁间的封闭效果。
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 May;22(4):1631-1639. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2216-x. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
7
Physicochemical Properties of Epoxy Resin-Based and Bioceramic-Based Root Canal Sealers.基于环氧树脂和生物陶瓷的根管封闭剂的物理化学性质
Bioinorg Chem Appl. 2017;2017:2582849. doi: 10.1155/2017/2582849. Epub 2017 Jan 22.
8
Scanning Electron Microscopic Evaluation of the Sealer-Dentine Interface of Three Sealers.三种封闭剂与牙本质界面的扫描电子显微镜评估
Iran Endod J. 2017 Winter;12(1):38-42. doi: 10.22037/iej.2017.08.
9
Marginal adaptation of newer root canal sealers to dentin: A SEM study.新型根管封闭剂与牙本质的边缘适应性:一项扫描电子显微镜研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2016 Jul-Aug;19(4):360-3. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.186453.
10
Antibacterial activity of resin composites containing surface pre-reacted glass-ionomer (S-PRG) filler.含表面预反应玻璃离子(S-PRG)填料的树脂复合材料的抗菌活性。
Dent Mater. 2016 Sep;32(9):1095-102. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2016.06.018. Epub 2016 Jul 12.