University of South Carolina School of Medicine Greenville, Greenville, South Carolina, United States of America.
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 15;16(6):e0252750. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252750. eCollection 2021.
Religion and spirituality play important roles in the lives of many, including healthcare providers and their patients. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationships between religion, spirituality, and cultural competence of healthcare providers.
Physicians, residents, and medical students were recruited through social platforms to complete an electronically delivered survey, gathering data regarding demographics, cultural competency, religiosity, and spirituality. Four composite variables were created to categorize cultural competency: Patient Care Knowledge, Patient Care Skills/Abilities, Professional Interactions, and Systems Level Interactions. Study participants (n = 144) were grouped as Christian (n = 95)/non-Christian (n = 49) and highly religious (n = 62)/not highly religious (n = 82); each group received a score in the four categories. Wilcoxon rank sum and Chi-square tests were used for analysis of continuous and discrete variables.
A total of 144 individuals completed the survey with the majority having completed medical school (n = 87), identifying as women (n = 108), white (n = 85), Christian (n = 95), and not highly religious (n = 82). There were no significant differences amongst Christian versus non-Christian groups or highly religious versus not highly religious groups when comparing their patient care knowledge (p = .563, p = .457), skills/abilities (p = .423, p = .51), professional interactions (p = .191, p = .439), or systems level interaction scores (p = .809, p = .078). Nevertheless, participants reported decreased knowledge of different healing traditions (90%) and decreased skills inquiring about religious/spiritual and cultural beliefs that may affect patient care (91% and 88%). Providers also reported rarely referring patients to religious services (86%).
Although this study demonstrated no significant impact of healthcare providers' religious/spiritual beliefs on the ability to deliver culturally competent care, it did reveal gaps around how religion and spirituality interact with health and healthcare. This suggests a need for improved cultural competence education.
宗教和精神信仰在许多人的生活中扮演着重要的角色,包括医疗保健提供者及其患者。本研究的目的是探讨医疗保健提供者的宗教、精神信仰与文化能力之间的关系。
通过社交媒体平台招募医生、住院医师和医学生,以电子方式完成调查,收集有关人口统计学、文化能力、宗教信仰和精神信仰的数据。创建了四个综合变量来对文化能力进行分类:患者护理知识、患者护理技能/能力、专业互动和系统层面互动。研究参与者(n=144)分为基督教(n=95)/非基督教(n=49)和高度宗教(n=62)/非高度宗教(n=82);每个组在四个类别中都有一个分数。采用 Wilcoxon 秩和检验和卡方检验对连续和离散变量进行分析。
共有 144 人完成了调查,其中大多数人完成了医学院学习(n=87),女性(n=108),白人(n=85),基督教(n=95),非高度宗教(n=82)。在比较基督教组与非基督教组或高度宗教组与非高度宗教组的患者护理知识(p=0.563,p=0.457)、技能/能力(p=0.423,p=0.51)、专业互动(p=0.191,p=0.439)或系统层面互动评分(p=0.809,p=0.078)时,两组之间没有显著差异。然而,参与者报告说,他们对不同的治疗传统的了解减少了(90%),对可能影响患者护理的宗教/精神和文化信仰进行询问的技能减少了(91%和 88%)。提供者还报告说,很少将患者转介到宗教服务机构(86%)。
尽管本研究表明医疗保健提供者的宗教/精神信仰对提供文化上合格的护理能力没有显著影响,但它确实揭示了宗教和精神信仰与健康和医疗保健相互作用的差距。这表明需要加强文化能力教育。